1,721,483 research outputs found
Correction to :β adrenergic receptor kinase C-terminal peptide gene-therapy improves ß2-adrenergic receptor-dependent neoangiogenesis after hindlimb ischemia (Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (2016) 356:2 (503–513) DOI: 10.1124/jpet.115.228411)
In the above article [Cannavo A, Liccardo D, Lymperopoulos A, Gambino G, D’Amico ML, Rengo F, Koch WJ, Leosco D, Ferrara N, and Rengo G (2016) J Pharmacol Exp Ther 356(2): 503–513; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.115.228411], the following funding information was omitted: This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health [Grant R37 HL061690]. The authors regret this error and any inconvenience it may have caused
Evaluation of the hypotensive effect of a beta-blocking agent (oxprenolol) combined with a vasodilator (bencyclan): A long-term study
Loss of cardioprotective effects of preinfarction angina in elderly but not in adult patients
Loss of cardioprotective effects of preinfarction angina in elderly but not in adult patients.
Loss of cardioprotective effects of preinfarction angina in elderly but not in adult patients.
Potassium sparing effect of amiloride in patients receiving diuretics: a quantitative study.
This study was undertaken in order to assess the K+ sparing ability of amiloride. Thirty patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites or congestive heart failure were divided into three groups and treated with amiloride (Group A), hydrochlorothiazide (Group B) and amiloride plus hydrochlorothiazide (Group C) for 15 days. In all groups there was an increased diuresis while only in group A and C there was a statistically significant rise of K+ serum levels and a slight increment of K+ urinary loss. Total body K+ evaluated by 42K increased in group A and C while decreased in group B. Our results seem to confirm that amiloride has a mild diuretic action with a powerful K+ sparing capacity; amiloride is also able to counterbalance and reverse hydrochlorthiazide induced K+ urinary loss
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Fractal analysis contains relevant information related to heart rate variability dynamics of normal and pathological subject
- …
