1,721,072 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Genebank genomics bridges the gap between the conservation of crop diversity and plant breeding
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Potentials and limits of genomics-assisted wheat breeding
Der Weizenertrag muss verdoppelt werden, um 2050 9 Milliarden Menschen zu ernähren. Das Ziel dieser Arbeit war es, die Chancen und Grenzen von markergestützter und genomischer Selektion zur Steigerung des Ertrags, sowie für Resistenzen gegen Ährenfusariosen und Septoriatritici zu prüfen. Die Assoziationskartierung zusammen mit diversen Validierungen ergab, dass alle drei Merkmale komplexvererbt werden und dem infinitesimalen Modell entsprechen. Diese genetische Architektur limitiert den Nutzen der markergestützter Selektion. Die genomische Selektion ermöglicht dagegen die präzise Vorhersage der drei Merkmale. Der Vergleich diverser genomischer Selektionsmodelle zeigt, dass Epistasie substanziell zur phänotypischen Variation beiträgt. Die Verwandtschaft war die treibende Kraft der Vorhersagegenauigkeit der genomischen Selektion. Das Verlässlichkeitskriterium erleichtert die Nutzung der Verwandtschaft indem die Vorhersagegenauigkeit für einzelne Genotypen geschätzt wird.Wheat yield needs to be doubled to feed 9 billion people by 2050. The goal of this thesis was to study the potential and limits of marker-assisted and genomic selection for enhancing yield, as well as resistances to Fusarium head blight and Septoriatritici blotch. The association mapping study in combination with different validation strategies revealed that all three traits were complex approximating the infinitesimal model. The complex genetic architecture limits the use of marker-assisted selection. In contrast, genomic selection allows predicting precisely all three examined traits. Contrasting different genomic selection models suggested that epistasis contributed to the phenotypic variation. Relatedness drives the prediction accuracy of genomic selection. Applying the reliability criterion facilitates to exploit relatedness very efficient by estimating the prediction accuracy of individual genotypes.vorgelegt von Sang H
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
