1,720,956 research outputs found

    A constraint-based approach to scheduling an individual's activities

    No full text
    The goal of helping to automate the management of an individual's time is ambitious in terms both of knowledge engineering and of the quality of the plans produced by an AI system. Modeling an individual's activities is itself a challenge, due to the variety of activity, constraint, and preference types involved. Activities might be simple or interruptible; they might have fixed or variable durations, constraints over their temporal domains, and binary constraints between them. Activities might require the individual being at specific locations in order, whereas traveling time should be taken into account. Some activities might require exclusivity, whereas others can be overlapped with compatible concurrent activities. Finally, while scheduled activities generate utility for the individual, extra utility might result from the way activities are scheduled in time, individually and in conjunction. This article presents a rigorous, expressive model to represent an individual's activities, that is, activities whose scheduling is not contingent on any other person. Joint activities such as meetings are outside our remit; it is expected that these are arranged manually or through negotiation mechanisms and they are considered as fixed busy times in the individual's calendar. The model, formulated as a constraint optimization problem, is general enough to accommodate a variety of situations. We present a scheduler that operates on this rich model, based on the general squeaky wheel optimization framework and enhanced with domain-dependent heuristics and forward checking. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates both the efficiency and the effectiveness of the selected approach. Part of the work described has been implemented in the SelfPlanner system, a Web-based intelligent calendar application that utilizes Google Calendar. © 2010 ACM.Aickelin U, 2009, IEEE T EVOLUT COMPUT, V13, P433, DOI 10.1109-TEVC.2008.2004262; Alexiadis A, 2009, INT FED INFO PROC, P399; Baptiste P., 2001, CONSTRAINT BASED SCH; BERRY P. M., 2009, P 21 INN APPL ART IN, P40; Feng G, 2008, ANN OPER RES, V159, P83, DOI 10.1007-s10479-007-0284-z; FREED M., 2008, P AAAI 08, P1287; GALLAGHER A., 2006, P 16 INT C AUT PLANN, P222; JOSLIN D., 1999, J ARTIF INTELL RES, V10, P365; Joslin D, 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, Vols 1-4, P1049, DOI 10.1109-WSC.2005.1574358; Kramer L.A., 2003, P 18 INT JOINT C ART, P1218; Laborie P, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5547, P148, DOI 10.1007-978-3-642-01929-6_12; LIM A., 2003, P 18 ACM S APPL COMP, P741; MOM P. J., 2004, P 6 INT BIC WORKSH A, P169; Myers K, 2007, AI MAG, V28, P47; Palen L. Social, 1999, P SIGCHI C HUM FACT, P17, DOI 10.1145-302979.302982; Payne S. J., 1993, Human-Computer Interaction, V8, DOI 10.1207-s15327051hci0802_1; REFANIDIS I., 2008, P ICAPS SCHED PLANN; Refanidis I., 2007, P 17 INT C AUT PLANN, P272; REFANIDIS I., 2004, P ICAPS WORKSH CONN, P56; REFANIDIS I., 2006, P ECAI WORKSH MOD SO, P17; REFANIDIS I., 2009, P ICAPS WORKSH CONST, P43; Smith S.F., 2003, P 1 MULT INT C SCHED, P3; VARAKANTHAM P., 2007, P 17 INT C AUT PLANN, P272; VARAKANTHAM P., 2008, P ICAPS WORKSH OV PL; Verfaillie G, 2005, CONSTRAINTS, V10, P253, DOI 10.1007-s10601-005-2239-9; ZABALA L., 2001, P 2 INT C INF TECHN20

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore