218,436 research outputs found
Karthik-reddy-bs/Rapid-PV-model: Initial Release
<p>This is the first published version of the data and the python scripts.</p>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/Karthik-reddy-bs/Rapid-PV-model/compare/Preview...v1.0">https://github.com/Karthik-reddy-bs/Rapid-PV-model/compare/Preview...v1.0</a></p>
Unilateral Complete Cleft Palate Repair: A Morpho-functional Approach
Contains fulltext :
196855.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)Radboud University, 16 november 2018Promotores : Kuijpers-Jagtman, A.M., Bergé, S.J., Reddy, S.G., Kummer, A.W.130 p
Assessing sweet sorghum juice and syrup quality and fermentation efficiency
Sweet sorghum is a C4 crop with high photosynthetic efficiency with a unique
ability of high carbon assimilation (50 g m-2 day-1) and accumulates high
concentrations of easily fermentable sugars (glucose, fructose and sucrose)
in the stalks. Hence, it is widely believed that it is an alternate energy source
that is renewable, sustainable, efficient, cost-effective, convenient and safe to
use. Sucrose is the major sugar in sweet sorghum juice which constitutes up
to 85% of the total sugars (Woods 2000). The sugar yields ranged between
1.6 to 13.2 Mg ha-1, with significant variations observed between years and
regions (Jackson et al. 1980; Reddy et al. 2007; Zhao et al. 2009). The juice
sugar content is dependent on the crop stage, because fructose is more
abundant at the early development stage, whereas sucrose tends to be
dominant after heading (Sipos et al. 2009). The sweet sorghum juice sugar
content ranged from 10 to 25 Brix% at maturity (Reddy et al. 2007; Ritter
et al. 2004). Research at the International Crops Research Institute for the
Semi-Arid-Tropics (ICRISAT) showed that sweet sorghum juice yield ranges
between 16.8 to 27.2 m3 ha-1 (Reddy et al. 2007) and accrues about 23%
additional returns vis-à-vis grain sorghum (Rao et al. 2009)
Smarandache Directionally n-Signed Graphs — A Survey
For graph theory terminology and notation in this paper we follow the book [3]. All graphs considered here are finite and simple. There are two ways of labeling the edges of a graph by an ordered n-tuple (a1, a2, · · · , an
Bending analysis of functionally graded rectangular plates using the dual mesh control domain method
The dual mesh control domain method (DMCDM) introduced by Reddy employs one mesh
for the approximation of the primary variables (primal mesh) and another mesh for the satisfaction
of the governing equations (dual mesh). The present study deals with the extension
and application of the DMCDM to functionally graded rectangular plates. The
formulation makes use of the traditional finite element interpolation of the primary variables
with a primal mesh and a dual mesh to satisfy the integral form of the governing differential
equations, the basic premise of the finite volume method. The method is used to
analyze bending of through-thickness functionally graded rectangular plates using the firstorder
shear deformation plate theory. Numerical results are presented to illustrate the methodology,
and a comparison of the displacements and stresses computed using the DMCDM
with those of the finite element model shows excellent agreement while requiring less formulative
(and possibly computational) effort. The influence of the extensional-bending coupling
stiffness (due to the through-thickness grading of the material) on the deflections is
also brought out
Prof. P. Rama Bayapa Reddy
Prof. P. Rama Bayapa Reddy completed BE in computers from Marathwada University, Aurangabad,Maharastra and M.Tech from JNTU, Anantapur. Now presently pursuing Ph.D from JNTUA, Anantapur. His area of interest is Internet controlled embedded systems, Six papers in International Journals. He has attended many national level seminars and conducted two workshops on Real Time Embedded Systems and attended several workshops. He has total of 15 years of teaching experience and two years as SAP ABAP Developer at SATYAM Computers ,Electronic City, Bangalore,Karnataka.Presently he is working as Professor in Computer Science and Engineering in Dhruva Institute of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabadhttps://www.interscience.in/mentors/1042/thumbnail.jp
Acanthoclita bengaluruensis Reddy and Shashank 2022, sp. nov.
Acanthoclita bengaluruensis Reddy and Shashank sp. nov. (Figs. 1, 2, 6, 9, 10, 13, 14, 19) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: C332DB03-8FAF-47AC-B45A-2AA1675DEFE2 Type material. J. Holotype. [India] Karnataka: Bengaluru, Kommasandra, 12°52′22.7″N 77°44′46.4″E, 898 mt., 26. VII.2021, MVL, Karthik Reddy M (gen. slide no. L00051806)-coll. INPC. Paratypes. 1♀, India: Karnataka: Bengaluru, Dommasandra lake, 12°52′26.5″N 77°44′52.8″E, 901 mt., 20.XI.2021, MVL, Karthik Reddy M (gen.slide no. L00051805); 1J, 1♀, India: Karnataka: Bengaluru, Dommasandra lake, 12°52′26.5″N 77°44′52.8″E, 901 mt., 09. VIII.2021, MVL, Karthik Reddy M; 1♀, India: Karnataka: Bengaluru, Thigala Chowdadenahalli, 12°53′16.9″N 77°44′34.7″E, 918 mt., 27. VII.2021, MVL, Karthik Reddy M; 1♀, India: Karnataka: Bengaluru, Dommasandra lake, 12°52′26.5″N 77°44′52.8″E, 901 mt., 01.IX.2021, MVL, Karthik Reddy M; 1♀, India: Karnataka: Bengaluru, Dommasandra lake, 12°52′26.5″N 77°44′52.8″E, 901 mt., 09.XI.2021, MVL, Karthik Reddy M-coll. INPC. Diagnosis. Acanthoclita bengaluruensis sp. nov. is closely related to A. trichograpta (Meyrick) from Australia. The forewings of A. trichograpta have a well-developed dorsal blotch but absent in A. bengaluruensis sp. nov.. In male genitalia, cucullus of A. bengaluruensis sp. nov. has a constriction in inner margin, obtusely curved outer margin, isolated spine close to margin at base, and aedeagus is long and strongly curved medially, whereas in A. trichograpta, cucullus is evenly curved, crescentic, with isolated spine more distant from margin, and weakly curved short aedeagus. The female genitalia of A. bengaluruensis sp. nov. is characterized by ductus bursae 2/3 length of corpus bursae, and larger signa, whereas A. trichograpta has ductus bursae less than half the length of corpus bursae, and with shorter signa. Description. Male (Fig. 1). Wingspan: 15-16 mm (n=2). Head (Fig. 6). Ocellus large, chaetosema welldeveloped. Vertex dark brownish orange, with long scales anteriorly projecting between antenna. Upper frons brownish orange, with anteriorly projecting moderately long scales; lower frons light brownish orange, with minute, upwardly appressed scales. Labial palpi moderately long (1.4 x diameter of eye); first segment light brownish orange; second segment strongly widened distally with long dark brownish orange scales along ventral margin, and apically along dorsal margin; terminal segment brownish orange, short and stout, downward pointing, concealed within the long scales from distal part of second segment. Antenna filiform, moderately long, light brown, reaching middle of forewing. Thorax. Posterior crest absent. Pronotal collar and tegulae dark brownish orange with pale brownish orange scale tips. Legs orange with dark brown tarsal rings, unmodified. Wings. Forewing brownish orange, elongate, subrectangular; male costal fold absent, costa evenly curve; apex rounded; termen straight; costal strigulae fine, yellowish white separated by fine brown marks along costa, ending with a conspicuous dark grey to brown rounded spot at apex edged by yellowish white strigulae 9 connected with terminal strigulae between R5 and M1; basal fascia indistinct; subbasal fascia indistinct; median fascia extending obliquely from costa to inner margin near tornus, light brown mixed with brownish orange, with dark drown spot beyond median fascia between base of M1 and M3; ocelloid patch with silvery grey striae between R5 and CuA2, surrounded by row of longitudinal, short, parallel black lines extending in a curve from apical 3/4 of costa to near tornus; with a dark brown subrectangular bar along termen below apical dark spot; underside light brown with yellowish grey spots on costa Hindwing greyish brown with sparsely scaled, translucent basal half, well-developed cubital pecten, and anal margin with modified scaling between CuA2 and 1A+2A, greyish brown scales; underside light brown Abdomen (Figs. 9, 10). greyish brown scales dorsally, with greyish orange anal tuft. S2 with well-developed anterolateral processes. Coremata, S8 a small crescentic plate, with U-shaped rib posteriorly; intersegmental sclerite associated with small tufts of long, broad, distally rounded scales laterally; T8 with strongly sclerotized T-shaped plate. Male genitalia (Figs. 13, 14). Vinculum a weakly sclerotized band. Tegumen subtriangular, weakly sclerotized. Uncus and socii reduced. Gnathos band-like, arising at middle of tegumen. Valva long and slender, constricted ventromedially; sacculus with large basal excavation; costal process well-developed; cucullus with a constriction apicodorsally 1/3, upcurved apically, obtusely curved outer margin, with rows of sparsely, shorter spines pointing outward and longer spines pointing inward, ventrobasally with one conspicuously long and narrow. Juxta subtriangular; caulis a well-sclerotized curved band, moderately long; aedeagus long, slender, tapering towards apex, strongly bent medially and apically weakly sinuate; vesica with a bundle of deciduous, lanceolate cornuti, and a distal series of short cornuti. Female (Fig. 2). Wingspan: 16-17 mm (n=5). As male, but slightly darker forewing colour, without modified scales; frenulum of three bristles. Female genitalia (Fig. 19). Ovipositor lobes elongate. Hind margin of S7 rounded-concave; anterior margin with a sclerotized curved band. Ostium a small semi-circular opening beyond hind margin of S7. Sterigma semicircular ring surrounding ostium. Ductus bursae membranous, slender, about 2/3 length of corpus bursae, with a weak sclerotization just below ostium; origin or ductus seminalis from posterior 1/3 of ductus bursae. Corpus bursae ovate, with two short horn-shaped signa, pointed apex. Distribution. Kommasandra, Dommasandra, Thigala Chowdadenahalli (India: Karnataka: Bengaluru). Host. Unknown. Etymology. The specific name refers to the name of the type locality Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. Remarks. Diakonoff (1982) took into consideration the characters of head, wing venation and genitalia of both sexes while erecting the genus Acanthoclita. Most of the Acanthoclita species are identified and characterized by various apomorphies such as forewing pattern and venation, hindwing with translucent base and modified anal region, male genitalia with fused gnathos and tegumen, valva with crescentic to falcate cucullus and isolated spines at base of cucullus, female genitalia of more derived species with complex sterigma around ostium with sclerotized, funnel-shaped posterior end of ductus bursae, and simple sterigma with a patch of modified scales on each side in less derived species of the genus which it shares with Matsumuraeses Issiki, 1957.Published as part of Reddy, Karthik M. & Shashank, P. R., 2022, Three new species of the tribe Grapholitini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae) from India, pp. 534-542 in Zootaxa 5219 (6) on pages 535-537, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5219.6.2, http://zenodo.org/record/743619
Orientogidiella indica Sidorov & Reddy & Shaik 2018, new combination
<i>Orientogidiella indica</i> (Holsinger, Ranga Reddy, and Messouli, 2006), new combination <p> <i>Bogidiella indica</i> Holsinger, Ranga Reddy, and Messouli, 2006: 45, Figs 1–5.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Previously recorded from three water-wells in Andra Pradesh state of the southeastern India (Holsinger <i>et al</i>. 2006) (see Fig. 1).</p> <p> <b>New record.</b> INDIA: nine specimens MNHN-IU- 2018-49: 3 ♀♀ measuring 3.5 mm each, oostegites undeveloped, 3 ♀♀ measuring 3.25 mm each, oostegites undeveloped, 2 ♂♂ measuring 2.75 mm each, ca. 1.5 mm fragment, Guthikonda caves, cave-pool sediments, 16.395112, 79.827492, elevation 160 m, Andhra Pradesh state, coll. Shabuddin Shaik, 6 th June 2014.</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> Specimens from the Guthikonda caves agree well with the original description in all essential characters, but a couple of them are at variance: (1) maxilla I outer plate with 7 instead of 6 spines, but their serrate nature is close to the original description (in Holsinger <i>et al</i>. 2006, p. 47); (2) gnathopods I and II in both sexes with two shallow dentations on inner face of dactyli accompanied by a thin seta each (similar to those in <i>O. reducta</i> <b>sp. n.</b>); specimens from the Guthikonda caves reached maturity at a smaller body size: largest males 2.75 mm, largest females 3.25–3.5 mm.</p>Published as part of <i>Sidorov, Dmitry, Reddy, Yenumula Ranga & Shaik, Shabuddin, 2018, Groundwater amphipods (Crustacea, Malacostraca) of India, with description of three new cavernicolous species, pp. 403-426 in Zootaxa 4508 (3)</i> on pages 411-413, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.3.4, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/2607246">http://zenodo.org/record/2607246</a>
Thaumatotibia ramamurthyi Shashank and Reddy 2022, sp. nov.
Thaumatotibia ramamurthyi Shashank and Reddy sp. nov. (Figs. 4, 5, 8, 12, 17, 18, 20) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: A9D53626-7889-49CF-853E-DAAE14BFA613 Type material. J. Holotype. [India] Karnataka, Bengaluru, Chikkavaderapura, 12°53′31.7″N, 77°44′40.3″E, 914m, 09.VIII.2021, MVL, Karthik, Reddy, M (gen. slide no. L00051932)-coll. INPC. Paratypes:J, India: Karnataka, Bengaluru, Chikkavaderapura, 12°53′31.7″N, 77°44′40.3″E, 914m, 06.VII.2021, MVL, Karthik, Reddy, M (gen. slide no. L00051933); ♀, India: Karnataka, Bengaluru, Chikkavaderapura, 12°53′31.7″N, 77°44′40.3″E, 914m, 09.VIII.2021, MVL, Karthik, Reddy, M (gen. slide no. L00051934) -coll. INPC. Diagnosis. Thaumatotibia ramamurthyi sp. nov. is closely related to T. aclyta (Turner) but it can be distinguished by the greyish brown to blackish brown forewings without a distinctly paler distal region. The male genitalia of T. ramamurthyi sp. nov. is characterized by a constriction between sacculus and cucullus, and undulating outer margin of valva, whereas T. aclyta has a smooth outer and inner margin of valva, and absence of constriction between sacculus and cucullus. The female genitalia of T. ramamurthyi sp. nov. is characterized by narrow sclerotized ring around ostium, a subtriangular lamella postvaginalis of dense microtrichia, colliculum a small sclerotized ringshaped sclerite, inception of ductus seminalis at anterior 1/3 of ductus bursae, and smaller signa, whereas T. aclyta has a broader ring around ostium, lamella postvaginalis represented by two ovate bands of dense microtrichia, colliculum a large ring-shaped sclerite anterior of ostium, inception of ductus seminalis at anterior 1/4 of ductus bursae, and larger signa. Description. Male (Fig. 4). Wingspan: 16-18 mm (n=2). Head (Fig. 8). Ocellus large, chaetosema welldeveloped. Vertex reddish-brown intermixed with dark brown. Upper frons dark brown, with anteriorly projecting short scales; lower frons dark brown, with minute, upwardly appressed scales. Labial palpi porrect, moderately long (1.8-1.9 x diameter of eye), dark brown; first segment short; second segment distally widened with appressed scales; third segment short with blunt apex. Antenna filiform, dark brown, reaching half-length of forewing. Thorax. Posterior crest a tuft of whitish scales. Pronotal collar dark brown with few reddish-brown scales. Tegulae dark brown mixed with copperish brown basally, some scales with white to cream apices. Legs dark grey with whiteringed tarsi. Wings. Forewings subtriangular, greyish brown ground color; male costal fold absent, costa almost straight except slightly curved apical 1/5; rounded apex; termen oblique and straight; distal paler region not distinct; staggered series of dark and white bands oblique to apex and parallel to termen; wing variably overlaid with dark grey to blackish-brown scales except for small pale band parallel to termen; costal strigulae light brown to grey broken by dark brown streaks; white scale tuft near base of dorsum; a small white dot in middle of wing; semicircular copperish-brown pretornal mark arched with black scales and outlined with whitish scales; cilia mixed whitish, grey and brown scales; underside light brown with greyish yellow spots on costa and outer margin between veins. Hindwing: Greyish brown; cilia pale grey; underside light brown. Abdomen (Fig. 12). Long copper-brown scales dorsally and grey anal tuft. S2 with well-developed anterolateral processes. T8 a broadly sclerotized plate, posterior margin medially convex. Coremata: S8 a crescentic plate, with paired tufts of scales laterally. Male genitalia (Figs. 17, 18). Vinculum a moderately wide band. Tegumen moderately sclerotized, ovate, with broadened base and rounded apex. Uncus and Socii absent. Gnathos moderately sclerotized semicircular depressions on each side with spinulose base. Valva large, elongate-oval, slightly constricted near ventromedially, with a small subtriangular knob dorsomedially; sacculus with large basal excavation with moderately dense bristles along ventral margin, costal process small; cucullus ovate, densely setose, with distinct, sparsely spines projecting outward along ventral margin. Juxta subtriangular; caulis moderately long and sclerotized, with rounded basal spinulose lobes; anellus surrounding base of aedeagus; aedeagus bulbous basal 1/4, remainder abruptly narrowed with parallel-sided; vesica with series of deciduous spiniform cornuti. Female (Fig. 5). Wingspan: 19.5-21 mm (n=1). As male, but with darker pre-apical blotch in the distal half of forewing, and absence of long grey scales dorsally on abdomen. Female genitalia (Fig. 20). Ovipositor lobes moderate, subreniform. S7 trapezoidal. Ostium in shallowed incision of S7 medially. Sterigma moderately sclerotized, narrow ring around ostium connected with subtriangular lamella postvaginalis, covered with dense microtrichia. Ductus bursae about 1/2 length of corpus bursae, gradually widened posteriorly with a small, sclerotized ring-shaped colliculum, inception of ductus seminalis at anterior 1/3 of ductus bursae. Corpus bursae ovate, with a weakly sclerotized, narrow ring of spinules at bursa neck, with two moderately long sickle-shaped signa. Distribution. Chikkavaderapura (India: Karnataka: Bengaluru). Host. Unknown. Etymology. The species name is given after Dr. V.V. Ramamurthy for his contribution to the Indian insect taxonomy. Remarks. Komai (1999) has revised Thaumatotibia, providing illustrations of their genitalia and early stages and characterized the genus by following apomorphies: 1, broadly sclerotized plate on tergum 8 in males with medially convex posterior margin laterally produced into curved points; 2, sterigma represented by a rectangular or ovate raised rim connected posteriorly with a pair of ovate depressions with modified scales; 3, ring of spinules around the entrance of corpus bursae (Komai, 1999).Published as part of Reddy, Karthik M. & Shashank, P. R., 2022, Three new species of the tribe Grapholitini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Olethreutinae) from India, pp. 534-542 in Zootaxa 5219 (6) on pages 538-541, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5219.6.2, http://zenodo.org/record/743619
- …
