616 research outputs found
Reaccreditation Steering Committee Minutes, 2010-2012
No full textOne PDF file and one PDF portfolio.Minutes of the Reaccreditation Steering Committee from 2010-2012. This group oversaw the research and writing of the College's 2012 Self Study
PBDAY. Steering Committee Meeting. Final Draft Reports. Report from the Siena Reference Centre.
No full textAuthor presents and discusses results from the Siena Reference Center ( PBDAY study) during the Steering Committee Meeting
Real-time Vehicle Steering Sensitivity Adaptation based on Time-Frequency Analysis of Individual Drivers' Steering Behaviour
No full textConventional steering systems in passenger vehicles have a mechanically fixed steering ratio. The steering sensitivity, defined as the amount of vehicle response to the driver's steering wheel input, remains fixed with changing road environments. Research has shown that driving comfort and safety can be improved when the vehicle's steering sensitivity is adapted to the road curvature profile. Current vehicle models can adapt the vehicle's steering sensitivity based on vehicle's speed and driver's steering wheel angle (i.e variable gear-ratio systems), or on individual selection of driving mode (i.e sport, comfort). It is hypothesised that adaptation of the steering sensitivity based on frequency measures of individual drivers' steering behaviour could improve driving comfort and safety. In a fixed-base driving simulator experiment involving 24 participants, real-time adaptation of steering wheel sensitivity based on individual drivers' steering behaviour was compared to three different fixed steering sensitivity settings on a road with changing road curvature. Here I show that intermittent switching frequency in drivers' steering movements can be used to adapt the vehicle's steering response to a varying road curvature. Significant differences in intermittent switching were found between different road curvature sections and between different steering sensitivity settings. Driver's positional control and comfort ratings did not significantly increase with the steering sensitivity adaptation strategy
Musculoskeletal Driver Model for the Steering Feedback Controller: Investigating the influence of driving posture on the steering response
No full textHaptic feedback from the steering wheel is one of the most important cues for driver to vehicle interaction. The right feedback is provided by ensuring that the haptic controller provides the required steering feel. Steering feel assessment and design is divided into a subjective and objective approach. The subjective approach entails experiments on the proving ground during which steering parameters can be tuned by steering experts. However, using only subjective assessment is time-consuming, costly and non-repetitive. Since there is no direct method to tune the steering feel objectively, a driver model is required to find a mathematical justification in the mechanical interaction between driver and vehicle during steering. A 3-dimensional multibody arm model is constructed to investigate the influence of driving posture on the nonlinear steering response. It was found that the torque acting in the shoulder joint is higher than in the elbow. The relation between joint torque and joint angles islinear in the shoulder, whereas nonlinearities were found in the elbow joint. Nevertheless, a change of driving posture (i.e. a change of haptic interface) leads to a different steering response. Findings from the driver model were validated by two steering experiments. Muscle contraction was measured in order to analyse the forces acting on the joints.This study shows promise to lead to a different approach for tuning steering parameters. Further investigation and detailed experiments are required to convert this driver model into a method to tune steering feel objectively.Mechanical Engineerin
The impact of steering ratio variability to road profiles on driver acceptance and driving behaviour
No full textVariable steering systems have the ability to change the ratio between the steering wheel and the front wheels while driving. These adjustable steering systems have led to an improvement in traffic and road safety and decrease in driver’s workload. A previous study concludes that driver steering behaviour is significantly dependent on vehicle speed and road curvature (number and sharpness of bends). Interestingly, variable steering ratio systems often depend on speed but not on road curvature. Variable steering ratio dependent on road curvature possibly influences driving behaviour and might be desirable for safety and driver acceptance. The goal of this research is to investigate driver acceptance and driving behaviour for two separate steering ratios (1:12 and 1:40) and two different road profiles (i.e. specific curvatures straight highway and curvy country road) at a constant speed. We hypothesize that on a curvy country road low steering ratio (1:12) leads to higher safety margins and subjective ratings, whereas on a straight highway a high steering ratio (1:40) leads to higher safety margins and subjective ratings. Therefore we conducted a within-subject driving experiment (N=24) in a fixed-based passenger vehicle simulator at constant speed. The results show that on a country road a vehicle with a low steering ratio increases time-to-line- crossing (TLC) safety margins and increases self-reported subjective ratings compared to the high steering ratio setting. Likewise, on a highway, a vehicle with a high steering ratio leads to higher safety margins and comfort rating compared to a low steering ratio. Thereby it can be concluded that steering ratio variable to the road profile improves safety and acceptance. These results provide promising evidence to make steering systems adaptable to road profile (e.g. steer-by-wire and active rear wheel steering).Mechanical Engineering | Vehicle Engineering | Human Factor
The effects of a varying steering response in machine-initiated and driver-initiated steering systems on driving behavior and driver acceptance
No full textCurrently, active steering systems are implemented in production vehicles to assist the driver by varying the steering response, where the adaptation of the steering response is either initiated by the vehicle or by the driver. Though studies have shown that these steering systems affect the steering performance positively, the effect on driving behavior and driver acceptance is not taken into account. Moreover, the effect of machine-initiated and driver-initiated steering systems on the driver has yet to be investigated. The aim of this driving simulator study was to examine the effects of machine-initiated and driver-initiated steering systems on driving behavior and driver acceptance. During the experiment, the machine switched between a slow and fast steering response on predetermined locations based on the traffic conditions and road curvature, and the driver could switch the steering response by pressing a mouse-button which was attached to the steering wheel. The expectation was that the preferred steering response would be dependent on the steering task, and that between machine- and driver-initiated steering there would be a trade-off between effort and acceptance. Twenty-four participants drove with a constant velocity on a two-lane road with three sections i.e. overtaking traffic vehicles, driving on a straight road and driving on a curved road. Four conditions were completed in a counter-balanced order i.e. passive slow steering response (PS), passive fast steering response (PF), machine-initiated steering (MI) and driver-initiated steering (DI). A post-experiment questionnaire showed that the participants had a preferred steering response for each of the three sections: between slow and fast for overtaking, slow on the straight road, and fast on the curved road. Furthermore, a lower effort and higher acceptance was achieved with the active steering systems compared to the passive steering systems, where there were no significant differences between MI and DI. For future research, it is recommended to further investigate the use of a range of steering responses and free driving speed
Magnetic Needle Steering
No full textabstract: Needle steering is an extension of manually inserted needles that allows for maneuverability within the body in order to avoid anatomical obstacles and correct for undesired placement errors. Research into needle steering predominantly exploits interaction forces between a beveled tip and the medium, controlling the direction of forces by applying rotations at the base of the needle shaft in order to steer. These systems are either manually or robotically advanced, but have not achieved clinical relevance due to a multitude of limitations including compression effects in the shaft that cause undesired tissue slicing, torsional friction forces and deflection at tissue boundaries that create control difficulties, and a physical design that inherently restricts the workspace. While most improvements into these systems attempt to innovate the needle design or create tissue models to better understand interaction forces, this paper discusses a promising alternative: magnetic needle steering. Chapter 2 discusses an electromagnetic needle steering system that overcomes all aforementioned issues with traditional steering. The electromagnetic system advances the needle entirely magnetically so it does not encounter any compression or torsion effects, it can steer across tissue-interfaces at various angles of attack (90, 45, 22.5°) with root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1.2 mm, achieve various radii of curvature as low as 10.2 mm with RMSE of 1.4 mm, and steer along complex 3D paths with RMSE as low as 0.4 mm. Although these results do effectively prove the viability of magnetic steering, the electromagnetic system is limited by a weak magnetic field and small 33mm cubic workspace. In order to overcome these limitations, the use of permanent magnets, which can achieve magnetic forces an order of magnitude larger than similarly sized electromagnetics, is investigated. The needle will be steered toward a permanent magnet configuration that is controlled by a 6 degree-of-freedom robotic manipulator. Three magnet configurations were investigated, two novel ideas that attempt to create local maximum points that stabilize the needle relative to the configuration, and one that pulls the needle toward a single magnet. Ultimately, the last design was found to be most viable to demonstrate the effectiveness of magnetic needle steering.Dissertation/ThesisMasters Thesis Mechanical Engineering 202
Lateral steering behaviour of cyclists on narrow bidirectional bicycle paths
No full textIn the Netherlands, the bicycle is a popular means of transport. One of the benefits of cycling is improved health due to more physical activity. However, cycling also causes a health burden due to the many cycling accidents in the Netherlands. The share of single bicycle accidents, where no collision with another road user is involved, has increased over the past years. In 2000 only 10% of all bicycle accidents were single bicycle accidents, while in 2018 this increased to 35%. One of the potential causes for single bicycle accidents is narrow bicycle paths. This research focussed on the influence of the bicycle path width of narrow bidirectional bicycle paths on steering behaviour, which can support a discussion on the required minimum width for bicycle paths in the guidelines. A controlled experiment is conducted to collect data of steering behaviour variables on different bicycle path widths while controlling other influencing factors. The results of the experiment show that cyclists cycle significantly closer to the path edge on narrower bicycle paths (55.6 centimeter on a 2-meter wide path and 37 centimeter on a 1-meter wide path), while there are no differences in average steering angle. An oncoming cyclist, which is in the experiment represented by a parked bicycle, forces cyclists to cycle even closer to the path edge, which makes the minimum distance to the path edge smaller. The minimum distance to the path edge becomes 15.1 centimeter on a 1.5-meter wide path. This smaller distance to the path edge increases the risk of riding off the path, which makes the narrower paths less safe. A questionnaire was used to examine the perception of the different path widths. The perceived safety of cyclists decreased on narrower bicycle paths. A 2-meter wide bidirectional bicycle path is considered safe to pass others by all participants, but on a 1.5-meter wide path this is only considered safe by half of the participants. The main research question was “What is the influence of the width of bidirectional bicycle paths on cyclists’ steering behaviour?”. It can be concluded that lateral position is related to the width of bidirectional bicycle paths, while steering angle rotation is not related to the width of bicycle paths. The results of the experiment are transferable to real-life traffic conditions, but do not include the variety in infrastructural conditions, cyclist ages and bicycle types. These varieties in real-life traffic conditions might increase the required bicycle path width.Civil Engineering | Transport and Plannin
Increasing science, technology, engineering, and mathematics skills using Project Lead the Way
No full textIncludes bibliographical references
Rehabilitation and COVID-19: a rapid living systematic review 2020 by Cochrane Rehabilitation Field. Update as of September 30th, 2020
No full textBackground: The COVID-19 outbreak response requires identifying and understanding the longterm consequences of this new pathology, and how to manage these. This living systematic review presents the most current and seminal information coming from the scientific literature. It is the monthly update of the second edition of the rapid living systematic review 2020 conducted by Cochrane Rehabilitation REH-COVER Action Steering Committee.
Objective: The aim of this review is to update the monthly COVID-19 and rehabilitation literature research up to September 30th, 2020.
Methods: Methodology described in the second edition of the rapid living systematic review 2020 conducted by Cochrane Rehabilitation REH-COVER Action was applied. The most important medical databases were searched, and papers related to COVID19 and rehabilitation were retrieved and summarized descriptively.
Results: The database search retrieved 2526 publications. Duplicates were removed, and 1150 unique records were screened for inclusion. After screening titles, abstracts and full-texts, 37 papers were included in the present review. According to OCEBM 2011 Levels of Evidence Table, most studies (78.4%) fall within the level of evidence 4 category, while the remainder (22.6%) are categorized as level of evidence 3. Most studies described patients in acute (51.4%) or subacute (35.0%) phase, while no studies described the chronic consequences of COVID-19. Just one study dealt with rehabilitation interventions regarding COVID-19, and two discussed reorganization of rehabilitative services.
Conclusions: The most recently published COVID-19 research focuses more on describing the clinical presentations and the natural history of the pathology, rather than rehabilitation interventions or service delivery. Studies with high levels of evidence regarding the efficacy of interventions, longterm monitoring, or new organization models remain lacking.status: Published onlin
- …
