1,722,105 research outputs found
[Letter from Meyer Bodansky to Ray K. and Louis Daily - June 21, 1939]
No full textLetter from Dr. Meyer Bodansky to Drs. Ray K. and Louis Daily regarding candidates for the general Jewish Relief Committee and the appointment of a non-Jewish doctor as the Chairman
[Letter from Meyer Bodansky to Louis Daily and Ray K. Daily - October 25, 1939]
No full textLetter from Dr. Meyer Bodansky to Dr. Louis Daily and Dr. Ray K. Daily, dated October 25, 1939. The letter informs the Dailys that a letter from a fellow doctor is enclosed for their analysis. Dr. Bodansky also discusses his plans for a vacation to Houston and the fact that his book was recently published. He also invites the couple to visit him and his wife Eleanor
Letter from Ray K. Levinson to Helen Farr Sloan, February 28, 1947
No full text2 leaves (single sided)Letter from Ray K. Levinson to Helen Farr Sloan, February 28, 194
Letter from Mrs. Ray K. Levinson to Helen Farr Sloan, 1947
No full text2 leaves (single sided)Letter from Mrs. Ray K. Levinson to Helen Farr Sloan, 194
Letter from Mrs. Ray K. Levinson to Helen Farr Sloan, 1947
No full text1 leaf (single sided)Letter from Mrs. Ray K. Levinson to Helen Farr Sloan, 194
Letter from Mrs. Ray K. Levinson to Helen Farr Sloan, 1947
No full text2 leaves (single sided)Letter from Mrs. Ray K. Levinson to Helen Farr Sloan, 194
Letter from Mrs. Ray K. Levinson to Helen Farr Sloan, 1947
No full text1 leaf (single sided)Letter from Mrs. Ray K. Levinson to Helen Farr Sloan, 194
Letter from Ray K. Levinson to Helen Farr Sloan, February 28, 1947
No full text2 leaves (single sided)Letter from Ray K. Levinson to Helen Farr Sloan, February 28, 194
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
