1,720,972 research outputs found
Leerstellen der Diskussion: eine kritische Besprechung der Abschlussberichte des RADIESCHEN-Projekts
No full textRezension zu:Klar, Jochen ; Enke, Harry (2013). Projekt RADIESCHEN: Rahmenbedingungen einer disziplinübergreifenden Forschungsdateninfrastruktur; Report „Organisation und Struktur http://ebooks.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/escidoc:117051:2 [Zugriff: 26.07.2013]Koudela, Daniela ; Köhler, Klaus ; Müller-Pfefferkorn, Ralph (2013). Projekt RADIESCHEN: Rahmenbedingungen einer disziplinübergreifenden Forschungsdateninfrastruktur; Report „Technik”. http://ebooks.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/escidoc:117050:4 [Zugriff: 26.07.2013]Rathmann, Torsten (2013a). Projekt RADIESCHEN: Rahmenbedingungen einer disziplinübergreifenden Forschungsdateninfrastruktur; Preise, Kosten und Domänen; Entspricht dem Report D4.3 „LZW-Kostenstruktur” nach Projektantrag. http://ebooks.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/escidoc:117052:2 [Zugriff: 26.07.2013]Rathmann, Torsten (2013b). Projekt RADIESCHEN: Rahmenbedingungen einer disziplinübergreifenden Forschungsdateninfrastruktur; Kostenverteilung und Risiken; Entspricht dem Report D4.2 „2. Entwurf LZW-Kosten” nach Projektantrag. http://ebooks.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/escidoc:117203:1 [Zugriff: 26.07.2013]Projekt RADIESCHEN (2013). Projekt RADIESCHEN: Rahmenbedingungen einer disziplinübergreifenden Forschungsdateninfrastruktur; Report „Synthese”; Entspricht dem Report D6.3 „Abschlussbericht des Projekts und Roadmap für eine Infrastruktur für Forschungsdaten in Deutschland” nach Projektantrag. http://ebooks.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/escidoc:117053:2 [Zugriff: 26.07.2013
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Licenses
No full textPresentation slides for the training seminar about Licenses in Research Data Management of the FoDaKo-project: https://fodako.de
English full text version: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1463156
German full text version: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.146495
Data Management Plan
No full textPresentation slides for the training seminar about Data Management Plans in Research Data Management of the FoDaKo-project: https://fodako.de
English full text version: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1465001
German full text version: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.146966
Licenses for Research Data
No full textThis text explains why it is important to license publicly available research data and provides an overview of the free Creative Commons licenses available. It will also discuss the difficulties involved in excluding commercial use and publishing modified data. A short section deals with topics that should generally be part of a license, another with which licenses can be given when research data is stored at RADAR or EUDAT.An information document of the German project FoDaK
Data Management Plan
No full textFull text version of the correspondent lesson of the German project FoDaKo (Forschungsdatenmanagement in Kooperation
Requirements of the Research Funding Organisations for Research Data Management
No full textFull text version of the correspondent lesson of the German project FoDaKo (Forschungsdatenmanagement in Kooperation). Discussed funding organisations: EU Horizon 2020, DFG, BMB
- …
