1,721,024 research outputs found

    Bristles formation in adhesive pads and sensilli of the gecko Tarentola mauritanica derive from a massive accumulation of corneous material in Oberhautchen cells of the epidermis

    Full text link
    Among lizards, geckos possess special digital scales modified as hairy-like lamellae that allow attachment to vertical substrates for the movement using adhesive nanoscale filaments called setae. The present study shows new ultrastructural details on setae formation in the gecko Tarentula mauritanica. Setae derive from the special differentiation of an epidermal layer termed Oberhauchen and can reach 30–60 μm in length. Oberhautchen cells in the adhesive pad lamellae becomes hypertrophic and rest upon 2 layers of non-corneous and pale cells instead of beta-cells like in the other scales. Only 1–2 beta-layers are formed underneath the pale layer. Setae derive from the accumulation of numerous roundish and heterogenous beta-packets with variable electron-density in Oberhautchen cells, possibly indicating a mixed protein composition. Immunofluorescence and immunogold labeling for CBPs show that beta-packets merge at the base of the growing setae forming long corneous bundles. Pale cells formed underneath the Oberhautchen layer contain small vesicles or tubules with a likely lipid content, sparse keratin filaments and ribosomes. In mature lamellae these cells merge with Oberhautchen and beta-cells forming a thin electron-paler layer located between the Oberhautchen and the thin beta-layer, a variation of the typical sequence of epidermal layers present in other scales. The formation of a softer pale layer and of a thin beta-layer likely determines a flexible corneous support for the adhesive setae. The specific molecular mechanism that stimulates the cellular changes observed during Oberhautch

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore