1,721,779 research outputs found

    Dr Rajesh Gupta

    No full text
    <p>Dr Rajesh Gupta is the Protemics & Small Molecule Mass Spectrometry Laboratory Coordinator at QUT.</p&gt

    Supplemental Material - PM2.5 bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in an Indian residential indoor air environment and their health risk

    No full text
    Supplemental Material for PM2.5 bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in an Indian residential indoor air environment and their health risk by Sangita Ghatge Goel, Shashank Somwanshi, Sanjay Kashyap and Rajesh Gupta in Indoor and Built Environment.</p

    sj-pdf-1-vmj-10.1177_1358863X221140151 – Supplemental material for Demographic and regional trends of peripheral artery disease mortality in the United States, 2000 to 2019

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-vmj-10.1177_1358863X221140151 for Demographic and regional trends of peripheral artery disease mortality in the United States, 2000 to 2019 by Rochell Issa, Salik Nazir, Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas, Jacob Lang, Robert W Ariss, Waleed Tallat Kayani, Mirza Umair Khalid, Laurence Sperling, Michael D Shapiro, Hani Jneid and Rajesh Gupta in Vascular Medicine</p

    10.1177_1358863X19886374_Supplementary_material – Supplemental material for Long-term mortality after massive, submassive, and low-risk pulmonary embolism

    No full text
    Supplemental material, 10.1177_1358863X19886374_Supplementary_material for Long-term mortality after massive, submassive, and low-risk pulmonary embolism by Rajesh Gupta, Zaid Ammari, Osama Dasa, Mohammed Ruzieh, Jordan J Burlen, Khaled M Shunnar, Hanh T Nguyen, Yanmei Xie, Pamela Brewster, Tian Chen, Herbert D Aronow and Christopher J Cooper in Vascular Medicine</p

    Retracted: Robotic Process Automation use cases in academia and early implementation experiences

    No full text
    Abstract Retraction: [Ankur Gupta, Purnendu Prabhat, Sahil Sawhney, Rajesh Gupta, Sudeep Tanwar, Neeraj Kumar, Mohammad Shabaz, Robotic Process Automation use cases in academia and early implementation experiences, IET Software 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1049/sfw2.12061)]. The above article from IET Software, published online on 19 May 2022 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the Editor‐in‐Chief, Hana Chockler, the Institution of Engineering and Technology (the IET) and John Wiley and Sons Ltd. This article was published as part of a Guest Edited special issue. Following an investigation, the IET and the journal have determined that the article was not reviewed in line with the journal’s peer review standards and there is evidence that the peer review process of the special issue underwent systematic manipulation. Accordingly, we cannot vouch for the integrity or reliability of the content. As such we have taken the decision to retract the article. The authors have been informed of the decision to retract

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore