133 research outputs found
D. Raev and A. Staneva. Hypertension and carotid intima-media thickness. Part I. Methodology
Адрес за кореспонденция:
Доц. д-р Димитър Раев,
Медицински институт – МВР;
бул. „Скобелев” № 79;
1606 София;
email: [email protected] ***** Address for correspondence:
Assoc. Prof. Dimitar Raev, MD;
Medical Institute – Ministry of Interior;
79, Skobelev Bul.;
1606 Sofia;
email: [email protected]Резюме. Първите морфологични промени в артериалната стена могат да бъдат визуализирани чрез B-mode ултрасонография. Каротидната ехография е използвана в многобройни клинични изследвания за мониториране на дебелината на каротидната интима-медия (ДКИМ). ДКИМ може да дефинира съдовата възраст и предклиничната атеросклероза. По-късните стадии на атеросклероза (плаки, стенози) също могат да бъдат визуализирани в присъствие или отсъствие на удебелен интима-медия комплекс. ДКИМ трябва да се измерва само на стандартно място с ултразвукови апарати с висока аксиална резолюция – на отдалечената стена на края на общата каротидна артерия и каротидния булбус по време на теледиастола. Крайната ДКИМ се определя от средните стойности на дебелината на двете общи каротидни артерии.
*****
Summary. The first morphological abnormalities of arterial wall can be visualized by B-mode ultrasonography. The carotid echography has been used in a number of studies to monitor the intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid arteries. The carotid IMT may define the vascular age and preclinical atherosclerosis. Later stages of atherosclerosis (plaques, stenoses) can also be identified either coincident with or in the absence of thickening intima-media complex. Carotid IMT should be measured only at standard place using high-axial resolution ultrasound system – on the far wall in the end of common carotid artery and at carotid bulb in end-diastole. The final carotid IMT is defined as averaged values of thickness ot both common carotid arteries
Is unitary and integral Yugoslavia possible?
Title: Bъзмοжнa πu e euòннa u uяπocmнa Юƨocπaeuя? Ha ƨpaнuyama мeжòy noπumuκama u фuπocoфuяma (Is unitary and integral Yugoslavia possible? On the borderline between politics and philosophy) Originally published: in the magazine Фuπocoфcκu npeƨπeò, IV, 1932, vol. III, pp. 197–227. Language: BulgarianThe excerpts used are from the original, pp. 213–214, 220, 221–223. About the author Dimitar Mihalchev [1880, Lozengrad (Tur. Kirklareli, present-day Turkey) – 1967, Sofia]: philosopher and diplom..
THE IDIOLECT OF REVEREND ECONOMOS DIMITAR POPNIKOLOV PETKANOV
A less studied talented author and brother of the popular fiction writer Konstantin Petkanov, priest
Dimitar wrote in the 1950s. This publication analyzes several parameters of his idiolect: phonetic peculiarities (reflex of ѣ, ѫ,
ъ; epenthetic [l]; reflexes of the [tʃ] [dʒ] groups; phonetic dialectisms; phonetic doublets); morphological paradigm (case
inflections; noun form for number; dualis; nomina collectiva; extended Church Slavonic suffix for adjectives; dialectal and
contracted pronoun forms; a temporal system characterized by high frequency of the verbs in terms of origin, distribution and
stylistic differentiation); lexical specifics (in terms of origin, distribution and stylistic differentiation). Emphasis is placed on
those lexical layers that constitute and ditinguish the author’s language. Hapaxes (produced using morphological and non-
morphological methods), rare words, semantic transponents, dialectisms, colloquial vocabulary and foreign words are studied.
All linguistic phenomena are examined retrospectively and in comparison with the synchronous linguistic situation before and
after the orthographic reform of 1945 in order to highlight the innovative contribution and the mechanisms through which the
author enriched the contemporary Bulgarian vocabulary. Occasionalisms, dialectal and archaic units occur more often in
Petkanov’s poetic works than in his fiction. The source material has been excerpted from Volume 1 (January – March) and
Volume 2 (April – June) of the hagiographic tetralogy “The Year of Our Lord“ and the memoir “A Book about My Brother –
the Writer Konstantin N. Petkanov“, which were published a few years ago by Dimitar Petkanov’s heirs
Imperium Militiae(I)
The most common idea in Romance studies is that Romans, as practical people, didn’t conduct theoretical research on their country or their army, but they gradually built them both. Meanwhile, they reformed and upgraded it, so that they could respond to the challenges of their age. Moreover, the basis of their research was not explicit doctrines, or prior concepts, in fact they used their own, or the experience of others, to find concrete solutions to daily problems. Just as the Hellenic romanophile Polibius (200-120 B.C), in his work Historia, asks the crucial question: ”Is it possible to have such an unreliable man who is not interested in how the Romans, with their unicipal structure, managed to conquer the whole world”? - in the same way the author of this paper, as much as its content allows, humbly and unpretentiously tries to answer the crucial question: “What kind of military structure
created and defended one of the biggest and most enduring empires in world’s history, and what rules governed it”
Relationship between rate-corrected QT interval and wall motion abnormalities in the setting of acute myocardial infarction
Diabetic Complications Affect the Diabetes Duration - Left Ventricular Function Relationship in Diabetic Cardiopathy: An Echo Study in Cardiac Asymptomatic Type 1 Diabetics
Increased Myocardial Contractility in Young Newly Diagnosed Type 1 (Insulin-Dependent) Diabetics Free of Diabetic Complications: An Echocardiographie Study
Molecular dynamics simulations of the electrical double layer at the 1 M KCl solution∣Hg electrode interface
- …
