1,721,135 research outputs found
Predicting Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia in Lung Cancer Patients across Institutions after Treatment with Photon- and Proton-based Radiotherapy
Principles and Practice of Proton Beam Therapy, AAPM Monograph, 2015 Summer School
2015 AAPM Summer School
\nINTRODUCTION
Chapter 1
Introduction and History of Proton Therapy
Indra J. Das and Harald Paganetti
\nChapter 2
The Practicing Clinician's Perspective on Proton Beam Therapy
Anthony Zietman
\nChapter 3
Proton Beam Interactions: Basic
Hugo Palmans
\nChapter 4
Proton Beam Interactions: Clinical
Indra J. Das, Alejandro Mazal, Ludovic De Marzi, and Vadim Moskvin
\nChapter 5
Proton Relative Biological Effectiveness
Harald Paganetti
\nTECHNOLOGY
Chapter 6
Proton Beam Production and Dose Delivery Techniques
Marco Schippers
\nChapter 7
Imaging for Proton Therapy
Katja Langen, Jerimy Polf, and Reinhard Schulte
\nChapter 8
Field Shaping: Scattered Beam
Alejandro Mazal, Annalisa Patriarca, Claas Wessels, and Indra J. Das
\nChapter 9
Field Shaping: Scanning Beam
X. Ronald Zhu, Falk Poenisch, Heng Li, Xiaodong Zhang,Narayan Sahoo, and Michael Gillin
\nChapter 10
Secondary Radiation Production and Shielding for Proton Therapy Facilities
Nisy Elizabeth Ipe and C. Sunil
\nDOSIMETRY
Chapter 11
Detector Systems
Stanislav Vatnitsky and Hugo Palmans
\nChapter 12
Dosimetry and Beam Calibration
Hugo Palmans and Stanislav Vatnitsky
\nACCPETANCE AND COMMISSIONING
Chapter 13
Acceptance Testing of Proton Therapy Systems
Jonathan B. Farr and Jon J. Kruse
\nChapter 14
Clinical Commissioning of Proton Beam
Lei Dong
\nOPERATION
Chapter 15
Quality Assurance, Part 1: Machine Quality Assurance
Bijan Arjomandy
\nChapter 16
Quality Assurance, Part 2: Patient-specific Quality Assurance
Bijan Arjomandy, Mark Pankuch, and Brian Winey
\nChapter 17
Proton Therapy Workflow
Martijn Engelsman, Juliane Daartz, and James E. McDonough
\nTREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY
Chapter 18
Immobilization and Simulation
Jon J. Kruse
\nChapter 19
Dose Calculations for Proton Beam Therapy: Semi-empirical Analytical Methods
Radhe Mohan, X. Ronald Zhu, and Harald Paganetti
\nChapter 20
Dose Calculations for Proton Beam Therapy: Monte Carlo
Harald Paganetti, Jan Schuemann, and Radhe Mohan
\nChapter 21
Uncertainties in Proton Therapy: Their Impact and Management
Radhe Mohan and Narayan Sahoo
\nChapter 22
Treatment Plan Optimization in Proton Therapy
Jan Unkelbach, David Craft, Bram L. Gorissen, and Thomas Bortfeld
\nChapter 23
Treatment Planning for Passive Scattering Proton Therapy
Heng Li, Annelise Giebeler, Lei Dong, Xiaodong Zhang, Falk Poenisch, Narayan Sahoo, Michael T. Gillin, and X. Ronald Zhu
\nChapter 24
Treatment Planning for Pencil Beam Scanning
Tony Lomax, Alessandra Bolsi, Francesca Albertini, and Damien Weber
\nChapter 25
Motion Management
Antje Knopf and Shinichiro Mori
\nChapter 26
Monitor Unit (MU) Calculation
Timothy C. Zhu, Haibo Lin, and Jiajian Shen
\nSPECIAL PROCEDURES
Chapter 27
Small Field Dosimetry: SRS and Eyes
Brian Winey and Marc Bussiere
\nChapter 28
In Vivo Dosimetry for Proton Therapy
Narayan Sahoo, Archana Singh Gautam, Falk Poenisch, X. Ronald Zhu, Heng Li, Xiaodong Zhang, Richard Wu, Sam Beddar, and Michael T. Gillin
\nAPPENDIX
Nomenclature and Terminology in Proton Therapy
Radhe Mohan and Harald Paganettiarticl
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
