1,721,853 research outputs found
Hyperintensional epistemic justification: a ground-theoretic topic-sensitive semantics
In recent years the study of topic or subject matter has found application in the analysis of epistemic attitudes such as knowledge and belief. To know or believe \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}\end{document} one needs to grasp \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}\end{document}'s topic, i.e. what \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}\end{document} is about. This yields a hyperintensional treatment of epistemic attitudes: if two necessary equivalent sentences differ in subject matter, they cannot be substituted salva veritate in the context of those attitudes. In this paper, I aim to extend this approach to propositional justification. I argue that, in contrast to epistemic attitudes, having propositional justification for φ does not require grasping the totality of φ's topic, but only part of it. This is the case because one may possess evidence for even without grasping the totality of φ's topic. I define what it means to be evidence for a proposition, borrowing some notions from the logical grounding literature. Building on extant frameworks modelling evidential support and subject matter, I then put forward a modal clause for propositional justification. Finally, I prove-together with the failure of some undesired principles-a ground-theoretic closure principle for the justification operator and show how it entails closure under Strong Kleene logic
Management e innovazione nella pubblica amministrazione
Il volume si collega ai numerosi testi accademici pubblicati dalla
fine degli anni ’70 sull’approccio economico-aziendale all’economia
delle aziende e delle amministrazioni pubbliche, a partire dal volume
“pioneristico” del lontano 1984, pubblicato dal gruppo di docenti e studiosi della Università Bocconi di Milano, coordinato dal professor Elio
Borgonovi
I PROCESSI DI RIFORMA DEL SISTEMA DELLA PUBBLICA AMMINISTRAZIONE ITALIANA. Diffusione di logiche manageriali e innovazioni nei sistemi contabili
Le prospettive di sviluppo della rendicontazione sociale nelle amministrazioni regionali: l’esperienza della Regione Lazio
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Pado Graziosi, I Balzi Rossi (n° 2 des Itinéraires ligures, 1951)
Barrière Claude. Pado Graziosi, I Balzi Rossi (n° 2 des Itinéraires ligures, 1951). In: Revue des Études Anciennes. Tome 53, 1951, n°3-4. pp. 358-359
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
