1,720,967 research outputs found
Clinical relevance of free peritoneal tumor cells detection in gastric and colorectal cancer: a multiple molecular approach
Background
Free disseminated peritoneal tumor cells derive from the detachment from primary cancer and may result in peritoneal carcinomatosis. Peritoneal lavage cytology has low sensitivity in detecting free peritoneal tumor cells; reverse-transcriptase polymerase reaction showed higher sensitivity but low specificity. Our study introduces the combination of the RT-PCR, the immunomagnetic enrichment and the immunofluorescence for the detection of peritoneal free tumor cells.
Materials and Methods
Samples of peritoneal lavage were collected from 22 gastric and 45 colorectal cancer patients; samples were also obtained from 6 patients who underwent abdominal surgery for non-malignant diseases. CEA and CK20 mRNA levels were quantified using a real-time qRT-PCR system. Immunomagnetic enrichment followed by immunofluorescence analysis was performed using monoclonal antibody against the pan-epithelial marker EpCAM/CD326 and polyclonal antibodies against the carcinoembryonic antigen.
Results
For gastric carcinoma the positivity rate for cytology, immunofluorescence and qRT-PCR was 14%, 18% and 77% respectively; for colorectal carcinoma the positivity rate for cytology, immunofluorescence and qRT-PCR was 0%, 18% and 44% respectively. All patients except one when positive at immunofluorescence were also positive at qRT-PCR. All samples of peritoneal lavage from the control group resulted negative for cytology, IF and real time qRT-PCR.
Conclusion
The combination of conventional real time qRT-PCR with immunoenrichment and immunofluorescence, which permit morphological assessment and unequivocal identification of the DTCs as well as validation of the molecular analysis, could be an useful and more powerful procedure for the detection of free peritoneal tumor cells.Non
Real-time intraoperative ureteral identification in minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a systematic review
Background: Although colorectal surgery (CRS) has currently almost entirely standardized surgical procedures, it can still show pitfalls such as the intraoperative ureteral injury. Intraoperative ureteral identification (IUI) could reduce the ureteral injuries rate but evidence is still lacking. We aimed to analyze the utility and the effectiveness of real-time IUI in minimally invasive CRS.Materials and Methods: A systematic review was performed examining available data on randomized and nonrandomized studies evaluating the utility of intraureteral fluorescence dye (IFD) and lighted ureteral stent (LUS) for intraoperative identification of ureters in CRS, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. Primary endpoint was ureteral injuries rate. Secondary endpoints included acute kidney injury, hematuria, urinary tract infections (UTI), and fluorescence assessment.Results: After literature search, 158 studies have been recorded, 36 studies underwent full-text reviews and 12 studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, out of a total of 822 patients who successfully received IUI, 3 (0.33%) patients experienced ureteral injury. Hematuria was reported in 689 (97.6%) of patients following LUS-guided surgery and in 1 (2%) patient following IFD-guided surgery, although transient in all cases. UTI was reported in 15 (3.3%) LUS-guided resections and in 1 (2%) IFD-guided resections. Acute kidney injury occurred in 23 (2.5%) LUS-guided surgery and 1 (1%) IFD-guided surgery.Conclusions: Real-time ureteral identification techniques could represent a valid solution in complex minimally invasive CRS, safely, with no time consuming and always reproducible by surgeons. Prospective studies will be needed to confirm these findings
Apoptosis and microvessel density in gastric cancer: correlation with tumor stage and prognosis.
Gastric cancer remains one of the most common human malignancies with a poor prognosis. Apoptosis is known to be a programmed cell death and its inhibition is involved in the unregulated cellular growth that leads to neoplasms. Microvessel density (MVD) has been investigated as a promoting factor for angiogenesis with conflicting results about its relation to survival. The aim of our study was to search a correlation between these factors and some clinicopathological features and prognosis. Identification of apoptotic cells was performed applying the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling technique and recorded as apoptotic index (A.I.), whereas monoclonal antibodies were used for the study of MVD. A significant correlation was found between low and high A.I. and the subgroup of patients in Stages I and II (P < 0.02); 20 per cent of patients with a low A.I. showed an overall survival longer than 5 years versus 44 per cent of patients with an high A.I. (P = 0.041). High MVD was significantly related to the T stage (P = 0.036) and to a poorer 5-year overall survival (P < 0.05). Further studies are required to confirm the role of apoptosis and MVD in the development and progression of gastric cancer
Indocyanine green fluorescence in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an easy procedure to prevent big troubles
No abstract avaiable
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
What are the differences between the three most used classifications for acute colonic diverticulitis? A comparative multicenter study
Background: Acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis is one of the most common clinical conditions encountered by surgeons in the acute setting. Currently, the most popular classifications, based on radiological findings, are the modified Hinchey, AAST, and WSES classifications. We hypothesize that all classifications are equivalent in predicting outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 597 patients from four medical centers between 2014 and 2021. Based on clinical, radiological, and intraoperative findings, patients were graded according to the three classifications. Regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used to compare six outcomes: need for intervention, complications, major complications (Clavien-Dindo >2), reintervention, hospital length of stay, and mortality. Results: A total of 597 patients were included. Need for intervention, morbidity, and reintervention rates significantly increased with increasing AAST, modified Hinchey, and WSES grades. The area under the curve (AUC) for the need for intervention was 0.84 for AAST and 0.81 for modified Hinchey (p = 0.039). The AUC for major complications was 0.75 for modified Hinchey and 0.70 for WSES (p = 0.009). No differences were found between the three classifications when comparing AUCs for mortality, complications, and reintervention rates. Conclusion: The AAST, WSES, and modified Hinchey classifications are similar in predicting complications, reintervention, and mortality rates. AAST and modified Hinchey scores result the most adequate for predicting the need for surgery and the occurrence of major complications. Level of evidence: Prognostic and epidemiological study, level III
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
