1,721,003 research outputs found

    Management of borderline ovarian tumors: results of an italian multicenter study

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: A rising number of patients affected by ovarian masses suspected of borderline ovarian tumor are operated on primary laparoscopic procedure. METHODS: From January 1992 to June 2004, 113 patients affected by low malignant ovarian tumor were followed at the Gynecologic Departments of five Italian Institutions. Fifty-two (46.0%) patients were operated on laparoscopic surgery, whereas traditional laparotomic approach was preferred in 61 cases (54%). In 53 patients (46.9%), a fertility-sparing surgical treatment was chosen. RESULTS: The diameter of the ovarian cysts ranged between 20 and 300 mm; in 20 out 113 patients (17.7%), the borderline tumor was bilateral. In 22/113 (19.5%) cases, we observed tumor rupture or spilling during surgery, and this incidence was greater in the group of patients treated by laparoscopy compared to laparotomy, and this difference is statistically significative. In 13/113 (11.5%) patients, we observed a relapse; the incidence of relapse, however, is not dependent on the type of surgical approach. The progression-free survival is higher for stages IA-IC if compared to stages more than Ist and the difference is statistically significant. Type of surgical approach, laparoscopic versus laparotomic, does not seem to influence the PFS; when cystectomy is performed, the PFS is significantly lower if compared with demolitive surgery or monolateral annessectomy. Eight pregnancies were obtained: in one case, miscarriage was observed, whereas 7 healthy babies were born all but two by vaginal delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative laparoscopic surgery may be the treatment of choice; an attractive option is that this surgery should be performed by an oncologist surgeon to obtain correct surgical staging and better results in terms of both relapse-free survival and pregnancies

    Histopathological characterization in carcinoma of the endometrium. Comparison between biopsy and pathological examination of specimen.

    No full text
    On the basis of a case series of 577 patients affected by carcinoma of the endometrium treated during the period 1963-1989 in the Gynecologic Institute of the Padua University, the present work examines the reliability of endometrial biopsy aiming at the correct histopathologic diagnosis, through comparison with the subsequent histologic examination of the surgical specimen. It is shown how simple biopsy alone allows for correct diagnosis of histotype in 91.6% of cases of adenocarcinoma, while the reliability of such an examination is reduced, respectively, to 30.7% in adenoacanthoma and to 37.5% in adenosquamous histotypes
    corecore