1,720,978 research outputs found
The effect of immunization of heifers against alpha 1-26 inhibin conjugate on the superovulatory response to pFSH
A total of 121 heifers was blocked by time and diet and then randomly assigned, within block, to an inhibin-immunized (I) or a control (C) group. Immunized heifers (n=61) received a primary immunization (Day 0) with 0.33 mg of an alpha 1-26 bovine inhibin fragment-human serum albumin (HSA) conjugate injected with non-ulcerative Freund’s and DEAE-dextran adjuvants. Booster injections were given on Days 28 and 56. Control heifers (n=60) received HSA and adjuvants. On Days 56 and 83 the ovaries of heifers were examined by ultrasound to determine the ovulation rate, and blood samples were collected for antibody titer determination. On Day 84, 61 heifers (C, n=30 ; I, n=31) received a total of 24 mg of porcine follicle stimulating hormone (pFSH), while 60 heifers (C, n=30; I, n=30) received 12 mg im pFSH, which was administered twice daily for 4 d in decreasing doses during the mid-luteal phase of the estrous cycle. Luteolysis was induced with prostaglandin F2alpha analog. The heifers were artificially inseminated and were slaughtered 7 d after estrus. Embryos were recovered and morphologically graded on a scale of 1 to 5 (1=excellent; 5=degenerated). Antibody titers (percentage binding at 1: 125 serum dilution) differed (P0.10) between Group C and I heifers when 12 mg pFSH were administered; however, immunization decreased the superovulatory response to 24 mg of pFSH
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Recommended from our members
THE EFFECTS OF ONCE OR TWICE-DAILY INJECTIONS OF PFSH ON SUPEROVULATORY RESPONSE IN HEIFERS
Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) is a glycoprotein hormone with a short half-life and has to be given twice daily for 3–4 days to induce superovulation in heifers. Since such a regimen is time consuming we compared the ovulatory response and yield of embryos in heifers following superovulation with either once or twice daily injections of pFSH for 4 days during the mid-luteal phase of a synchronized estrous cycle or during a prolonged luteal phase in heifers which had been immunized against prostaglandin F2α (PG). In Experiment 1, crossbred heifers (n = 42) previously actively immunized against a PG immunogen were superovulated in a 2 (cyclic or persistent corpus luteum) × 2 (once or twice daily injection) factorial plan. The heifers were superovulated with 75 units pFSH, which was injected subcutaneously once (22.5, 22.5, 15 and 15 units per day) or twice daily (9.3 units per injection) for 4 days. In Experiment 2, cyclic crossbred beef heifers (n = 80) were superovulated using pFSH which was given randomly to heifers once daily subcutaneously (T1) or twice daily intramuscularly (T2) using the same daily dose of 9, 7, 5, and 3 mg per day. Estrus was induced in all heifers in both experiments using 500 μg and 250 μg Cloprostenol 12 hours apart on the third day of pFSH injections. All heifers were inseminated twice with frozen-thawed semen at 12 and 24 hours after the onset of standing estrus or at 56 and 72 hours after the first PG if estrus was not observed. Embryos were recovered at slaughter and graded on a scale of 1 to 5 (1=excellent, 5=degenerated). Data were recorded for the number of corpora lutea (CL), large (≥10 mm) and medium (5-9 mm) follicles, number of embryos recovered and embryo morphology. Data were analyzed by least squares analysis of variance procedures. In Experiment 1, there was no difference in ovulation rate between main effects. Fewer embryos were recovered from heifers with a persistent corpus luteum (pCL) and injected once daily (1.71±.75 vs. 5.75±1.27) than from any other group. Heifers with pCL yielded lower (P<0.05) numbers of freezable embryos than cyclic animals, regardless of injection regimen. In Experiment 2, T2 heifers had a significantly higher number of CL (16.4±1.7 vs. 7.7±1.7; P=0.0003), large follicles (4.1±0.5 vs. 2.8±0.5; P=0.04), medium follicles (6.4±0.7 vs. 4.4±0.7; P=0.04), embryos recovered (9.6±1.1 vs. 4.9±1.1; P=0.0025) and freezable embryos (4.7±0.7 vs. 2.1±0.7; P=0.014) than T1 heifers. It is concluded that a single daily subcutaneous injection of pFSH results in a lower superovulatory response than the twice daily regimen in heifers
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
