1,721,005 research outputs found
MRT Review of C.A.P.: Efficiency grounds and welfare effects: an AGE analysis on the Italian Economy
No full textEfficiency grounds and welfare effects in decoupling farm support. Insights from an AGE model of the Italian economy
No full textThis paper investigates both efficiency and redistributive effects of the recent reform of Common Agricultural Policy in Italy. A general equilibrium model has been calibrated on a social accounting matrix of the Italian economy, adapted to represent the distribution of agricultural income between households. In simulation results the decoupling of farm support proves to be a welfare-improving policy. Moreover this welfare effect is enhanced by redistributing the support towards low-income agricultural households. In terms of possible policy implications, simulation results suggest that redistributive effects in decoupling farm support may be a crucial aspect for the allocation of the EU agricultural budget
Exploring Costs and Benefits of HACCP. The IT-2D Dairy Case. In TNO, Exploring Costs and Benefits of HACCP: A Pilot Study in the Dairy and Meat Products Industry in the European Union. QLK1-CT-2003-30164, TNO Report V5776, Appendix 1, Zeist, The Netherlands.
No full textReport di Ricerca di progetto Europe
New trends of sustainable consumption: the farmers’ market as a business imperative for the reeducation of consumers
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
