1,721,002 research outputs found
Erratum: Envisioning translational hyperscanning: how applied neuroscience might improve family-centered care (Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (2022) (nsac061) DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsac061)
No full textThis is a correction to: Elisa Roberti, Elena Capelli, Livio Provenzi Envisioning translational hyperscanning: how applied neuroscience might improve family-centered care, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2022; nsac061, https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsac061 In the originally published version of this manuscript, the order of authors and the authors’ affiliations were incorrectly given as follows: Livio Provenzi,1,2 Elisa Roberti,2 and Elena Capelli2 1Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia 27100, Italy 2Developmental Psychobiology Lab, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia 27100, Italy The Publisher apologizes for this error, which occurred during the production process. The author list and authors’ affiliations have now been corrected, as follows: Elisa Roberti,1 Elena Capelli,1 and Livio Provenzi2,1 1Developmental Psychobiology Lab, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia 27100, Italy 2Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia 27100, Ital
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Video-Feedback Interventions to Support Parents of Children with Neurodevelopmental Disabilities
No full textInfants with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDs) show emotional, cognitive, and socio-interactive dysregulation that dramatically impacts parents’ caregiving behaviors. Early video-feedback interventions (VFIs) are effective in promoting sensitive parenting, which in turn supports infants’ development, even in the case of NDs. In the light of limited resources of the healthcare systems, technological advances in telecare may facilitate the delivery of VFI to a greater number of families of infants with ND. To date, no study has tested the effectiveness of a telecare VFI (TVFI) for families of infants with this clinical condition. The first part of the present chapter presents the state of the art in the use of VFIs to support parents of children with NDs and evidence about its effectiveness in promoting both parents and children’s health. The second part of the chapter presents the Supporting Parenting at Home-Empowering Rehabilitation through Engagement (SPHERE) project, an ongoing randomized control trial aimed at assessing the effectiveness of an early family-centered TVFI for parents of infants diagnosed with ND, providing insights and future directions from both a research and clinical point of view
Interactive Computer Aided Learning in the Didactic Activities of a Co-operative Virtual Classroom
No full textkoamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
