1,721,115 research outputs found

    AAV-CRISPR Persistence in the Eye of the Beholder

    Full text link
    Despite advances in genome editing technologies based on the adeno-associated virus (AAV)-CRISPR system, there are still concerns about the long-term persistence of recombinant AAV vectors in several organs (liver, muscle, eye) possibly leading to cytotoxicity or genotoxicity related to off-target effects. Indeed, there are still unanswered questions about long-lasting in vivo AAV persistence as a linear or circular DNA that is not targeted by epigenetic silencing in many tissues. In 2017, Kim et al.1 reported an editing approach based on AAV-CjCas9 to downregulate Vegfa or the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor Hif1a in mice displaying age-related macular degeneration (AMD)-related pathological choroidal neovascularization (CNV) induced by laser treatment. Although partial knockdown of either Vegfa or Hif1a provided benefits and reduced the area of CNV, local opsin dysfunction near the Vegfa-edited cells of murine retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) was observed. Conversely, no cone dysfunction was reported upon Hif1a partial knockdown. Lastly, no genome-wide off-target indels, evaluated 6 weeks after intravitreal injection of AAV-CjCas9 vector, were scored, indicating that prolonged expression of AAV-CjCas9 in vivo did not aggravate the genotoxic risk associated with the CjCas9 nuclease. In this issue of Molecular Therapy, the authors now report a long-term (14 months) safety study on C57BL/6J mice intravitreally injected with AAV-CjCas9 vectors targeting Vegfa or Hif1a genes.2 The findings continue to show that the AAV-CRISPR system in the eyes is long lasting, effective, and safe

    CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in vitro and in retinal cells in vivo

    No full text
    CRISPR/Cas9 is an efficient tool to knock down specific genes in various organisms. In this chapter, we describe how to assess knock-down of human Rhodopsin (RHO) gene carrying the P23H mutation in vitro, in engineered HeLa cells and in vivo, in P23H RHO transgenic mice. To this aim, we report two molecular assays: site-specific PCR on P23H RHO cells treated with CRISPR/Cas9 and Western blotting analysis on retinal cells prepared from P23H RHO transgenic mice electroporated with CRISPR/Cas9 and GFP plasmids

    Gene editing prospects for treating inherited retinal diseases

    No full text
    Retinal diseases (RD) include inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD), for example, retinitis pigmentosa and Leber's congenital amaurosis, or multifactorial forms, for example, age-related macular degeneration (AMD). IRDs are clinically and genetically heterogeneous in nature. To date, more than 200 genes are known to cause IRDs, which perturb the development, function and survival of rod and cone photoreceptors or retinal pigment epithelial cells. Conversely, AMD, the most common cause of blindness in the developed world, is an acquired disease of the macula characterised by progressive visual impairment. To date, available therapeutic approaches for RD include nutritional supplements, neurotrophic factors, antiangiogenic drugs for wet AMD and gene augmentation/interference strategy for IRDs. However, these therapies do not aim at correcting the genetic defect and result in inefficient and expensive treatments. The genome editing technology based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated protein (Cas) and an RNA that guides the Cas protein to a predetermined region of the genome, represents an attractive strategy to tackle IRDs without available cure. Indeed, CRISPR/Cas system can permanently and precisely replace or remove genetic mutations causative of a disease, representing a molecular tool to cure a genetic disorder. In this review, we will introduce the mechanism of CRISPR/Cas system, presenting an updated panel of Cas variants and delivery systems, then we will focus on applications of CRISPR/Cas genome editing in the retina, and, as emerging treatment options, in patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells followed by transplantation of retinal progenitor cells into the eye

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
    corecore