9,483 research outputs found
A forma estrutural na obra do arquiteto Milton Ramos
No full textO artigo analisa a relação entre forma arquitetônica e estrutura nos edifícios projetados por Milton Ramos em
Brasília, destacando o conceito de Forma Estrutural, introduzido por Siegel (1960). O estudo investiga como
a estrutura pode determinar a expressão arquitetônica, com base nos princípios da Arte Estrutural definidos
por Billington (1983): eficiência, economia e elegância. A pesquisa inclui um levantamento bibliográfico
sobre Forma Estrutural e métodos de análise estrutural, seguido de um estudo sobre a trajetória profissional
de Milton Ramos e suas obras mais representativas. Para aprofundar a análise, o artigo foca no Oratório do
Soldado, edifício religioso projetado por Ramos e construído pelo Exército Brasileiro. A metodologia adotada
envolve a construção de um modelo computacional qualitativo utilizando o software Ftool, que permitiu
examinar os esforços estruturais atuantes no edifício. Os gráficos de momento fletor gerados pelo software
indicam que a distribuição dos esforços na estrutura do Oratório está diretamente relacionada à sua forma
arquitetônica. Isso demonstra o conhecimento técnico de Ramos e sua habilidade em criar edificações com
forte impacto visual e estruturalmente eficientes. Além do Oratório do Soldado, outras obras de Milton Ramos
são destacadas, como o Estádio Pelezão (já demolido), o Instituto Histórico e Geográfico do DF e o Ginásio
do Clube CASSAB. Essas construções evidenciam a aplicação do conceito de Forma Estrutural em sua prática
profissional. A pesquisa conclui que a análise qualitativa computacional se mostra uma ferramenta valiosa
para compreender a interação entre estrutura e forma arquitetônica. O estudo reforça a importância de
profissionais como Milton Ramos para a Arquitetura Moderna de Brasília e para a formação de novos
arquitetos e engenheiros.Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo (FAU)Departamento de Tecnologia em Arquitetura e Urbanismo (FAU TEC)Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanism
A break in neoliberal ideology? : A critical analysis of Bolivian elite discourse
No full textIm Dezember 2005, gewannen Evo Morales und seine Partei, die Bewegung zum Sozialismus (MAS), mit über 50 Prozent der Stimmen die Wahlen in Bolivien. Dieses war das stärkste Wahlergebnis einer Partei seit Einführung der Demokratie 1982. Morales wurde im Januar 2006 als der zweite indigene Präsident Lateinamerikas eingeweiht. Die Einweihungszeremonie war gleichzeitig ein Triumph der anti-neoliberalen Bewegung Boliviens, welche im Wasserkrieg im Jahr 2000 und im Steuer- und Gaskrieg im Jahr 2003 ihren Höhepunkt erreichte. Morales und MAS unterstützten die sogenannten Neoliberalen Kriege. Der Sieg der MAS und von Morales in den Wahlen regt Spekulationen an, dass der Neoliberale Konsens in der Elite, der Bolivien zwei Jahrzehnte lang regierte, gebrochen ist. Die Frage nach einem Konsenswechsel ergibt sich nicht nur von Morales’ und MAS Partizipation in den Neoliberalen Kriegen, sondern auch weil die MAS viele Forderungen der Proteste 2000 und 2003 in ihr Parteiprogramm aufgenommen haben. Während sich Morales’ anti-neoliberale Denkweisen offensichtlich in der bolivianischen Bevölkerung großer Beliebtheit erfreuen, ist es nicht erwiesen, dass sich diese Popularität auf die Elite des Landes erstreckt. Der potentielle Konsensbruch bezüglich des Neoliberalismus in der Elite entstand jedoch nicht von ungefähr. Im Gegenteil: er baute sich über die gesamte Geschichte Boliviens hinweg auf und wurde von den Rahmenbedingungen im Land begünstigt. Mit Hilfe der kritischen Theorie von Antonio Gramsci und Robert W. Cox, welche in Kapitel 2 vorgestellt wird, erforscht diese Magisterarbeit ob der Neoliberale Konsens in der Bolivianischen Elite gebrochen ist. Mit Unterstützung des Konzeptes, dass Geschichte und Produktionsbeziehungen Gesellschaften und die Gegebenheiten in ihnen den hegemonialen Diskurs formen, stellt diese Arbeit in den Kapiteln 3 Boliviens Geschichte bis dato dar und bespricht in Kapitel 4 wichtige Themen der aktuellen Bolivianischen Politik und Wirtschaft. Die Umsetzung der neoliberalen Ideologie und Richtlinien in Bolivien wurde von den USA, den hegemonialen Institutionen (der Internationalen Währungsfond und der Weltbank) sowie der sich in der Regierung abwechselnden Elite propagiert und implementiert. Die neoliberalen Programme der 1980er und 1990er wurden trotz bitteren Protesten seitens der Bevölkerung beibehalten, die sich gegen die negativen Konsequenzen der Programme wehrten. Da die kritischen Theorie Konflikte als Mechanismen sieht, die Machtverhältnisse verändern und einen Hegemon/ein hegemoniales System stürzen können, werden auch die Neoliberalen Kriege Boliviens besprochen. Insbesondere im Steuer und Gaskrieg 2003 baute sich ein anti-hegemonialer Diskurs auf. Dieser Konflikt, in dem die MAS mitagierte, wird besonders begutachtet weil er den Präsidenten Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada (der neoliberale Kopf Boliviens) stürzte. Auf diesen Erkenntnissen basierend, wird in Kapitel 5 die Zeitungsanalyse vorgestellt. Diese wurde in zwei Zeiträumen vorgenommen: 2. bis 19. Oktober 2003 und 22. Januar bis 19. Februar 2006 (erster Monat der MAS-Regierung). Es wurden drei Zeitungen analysiert, welche je eine politische Strömung in der Bolivianischen Elite repräsentieren (La Prensa, konservative Tageszeitung; La Epoca, moderate Wochenzeitung, El Juguete Rabioso, ein alle zwei Wochen erscheinende linke Zeitung). Die Befunde der Zeitungsanalyse zeigten, dass die Bolivianische Elite sich sowohl gegen die anti-neoliberale Politik der MAS wendet, aber auch den Neoliberalismus und die Internationalen Finanzinstitutionen den Rücken gekehrt hat. Sie bewies auch, dass die Elite im Jahr 2003 erneut die Massen zu ihrem eigenen Vorteil missbrauchten, in dem sie ihre Wut, die gegen die Privatisierung der Gas Reserven gerichtet war, auf den regierenden Präsidenten (Sanchez de Lozada) umlenkten. Insofern zeigte die Zeitungsanalyse auch, dass ohne die Zustimmung der Elite in Bolivien ein friedlicher Systemwechsel unwahrscheinlich ist. Wie im Endfazit (Kapitel 6) beschrieben wird, hofft die bolivianische Elite, dass sich die MAS und Morales in inner- bzw. zwischen-parteilichen Scharmützeln verfängt, damit sich in der Zwischenzeit eine Alternative zwischen anti-hegemonialen und hegemonialem Diskurs findet, welche den Reichtum und die Macht der Elite erhält. Dies dürfte sich als schwierig erweisen, weil die politische Mitte Boliviens leer steht
Nototanoides oliveri Morales-Núñez & Ramos-Tafur 2023, sp. nov.
No full text<i>Nototanoides oliveri</i> sp. nov. <p>(Figs. 3–14, 16B, F, J, N, R, 17–18)</p> <p> <i>Nototanoides trifurcatus</i> Sieg & Heard 1985: 52. (in part)</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> <i>Female</i>. <i>Antennule</i> with article-3 bearing row of ~11 aesthetascs on sub-proximal ventral margin. Left mandible <i>lacinia mobilis</i> with eight denticles. <i>Maxilliped</i> palp article-2 with mid inner margin setulose and inner distal margin with modified spiniform seta with about four to five setules on dorsal margin and one setule on ventral margin. <i>Cheliped</i> with fixed finger having one sinuate seta on outer incisive margin, chela with six simple setae on ventral margin, and dactylus integument covered by scales. <i>Pleopods</i> with inner margin setulose.</p> <p> <i>Male</i>. <i>Antennule</i> with article-4 bearing row of ~9–10 aesthetascs on sub-proximal ventral margin. <i>Cheliped</i> with basis having mid-ventral margin swollen, forming a rounded apophysis/protuberance, and chela with seven simple setae on ventral margin.</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> This species is named in honor to Oliver Morales-Sierra, the beloved son of the senior author.</p> <p> <b>Material examined. Type material.</b> <i>Holotype</i> (USNM 1606640), ovigerous ♀, TBL 3.6 mm, eastern Gulf of Mexico, Florida, ~170 Km E off New Port Richey, 28°25'55''N – 84°41'39''W, depth 64 m, 09 June 2017, station SMP171702013, R / V <i>Tommy Munro</i>, bottom trawl.</p> <p> <i>Paratypes:</i> 40 non-ovigerous ♀♀ (without oostegites) (USNM 1606641), 20 ovigerous ♀♀ (USNM 1606642), 10 ♀♀ with empty marsupium (USNM 1606643), and 40 ♁♁ (USNM 1606644)), same collection data as holotype; 40 non-ovigerous ♀♀ (without oostegites (UF Arthropoda 71396)), 16 ovigerous ♀♀ (UF Arthropoda 71397), 10 ♀♀ with empty marsupium (UF Arthropoda 71398), 40 ♁♁ (UF Arthropoda 71399), same collection data as holotype; 40 non-ovigerous ♀♀ (without oostegites) (GCRL 6619), 20 ovigerous ♀♀ (GCRL 6620), 10 ♀♀ with empty marsupium (GCRL 6621), and 40 ♁♁ (GCRL 6622), same collection data as holotype; 30 non-ovigerous ♀♀ (without oostegites) and 15 ♁♁ (FSBCI 171988), same collection data as holotype; two ovigerous ♀♀ (one damage (dried out) (USNM 1462798), Project Hour Glass (Florida West Coast), 26°24’00’’N – 84°13’00’’W, depth 73.2 m, station E.</p> <p>Additional specimens from the type locality are in the first author’s personal collection.</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> Based on ovigerous ♀. Carrying ~ 28 eggs.</p> <p> <i>Body</i> (Figs. 3A–B, 8). Dorsoventrally flattened, TBL 4.0 mm, about 5.4 times as long as wide.</p> <p> <i>Cephalothorax</i> (Figs. 3A–B, 8A–B). About 24% of TBL; about same length that of pereonites 1–3 combined, 1.3 times longer than wide, narrowed anteriorly and gently rounded posteriorly; eyelobes present, visual elements present, with one pair of lateral simple setae posterior to eyes; rostrum blunt-rounded (Figs. 3A, 8B).</p> <p> <i>Pereon</i> (Figs. 3A, 8A). About 50% of TBL; each pereonite wider than long, lateral distal borders rounded; pereonites 1 and 6 shorter than other pereonites; pereonites 2–5 increasing in length, being pereonite-5 longest; each pereonite with one pair of dorsoanterior lateral simple setae; pereonite-6 with pair of dorsoposterior lateral simple seta.</p> <p> <i>Pleonites</i> (Figs. 3A, 8A). About 21% of TBL; combined length of pleonites 1–5 slightly shorter than length of pereonites 4–6, all pleonites sub-equal in length, wider than long; each with one pair of dorsolateral simple setae; pleonites 1–4 with row of ~13, 17, 19, and 15 lateral simple setae, respectively; pleonite-5 with row of ~11 lateral simple setae.</p> <p> <i>Pleotelson</i> (Figs. 3A, C, 8A). About 5% of TBL; slightly narrower than pleonites, wider than long, trapezoidal, with acute distal tip, one pair of dorsoanterior lateral simple setae, one pair of posterior simple setae, one pair of simple and PSS setae, and four (two simple and two PSS) setae on apex.</p> <p> <i>Antennule</i> (Fig. 4B–C). Longer than half cephalothorax length, with three articles. Article-1 longer than combined length of articles 2–3, about 3.9 times as long as wide; outer margin with two clusters of three PSS and one mid simple long seta, sub-distal outer margin with row of four (one long simple and three PSS) setae; inner margin with one mid small simple seta and one sinuate distal simple seta. Article-2 about 1.9 times as long as wide; distodorsal outer margin with simple seta; distoventral inner margin with two setae (one simple one PSS). Article-3 about 2.5 times as long as wide; ventrally with sub-proximal row of ~11 aesthetascs (Fig. 4C); distally with one PSS, one aesthetasc, and six simple setae of varying lengths.</p> <p> <i>Antenna</i> (Fig. 4D–E). Slightly longer than length of antennule article-1. With six articles.Article-1 about 1.4 times wider than long, sub-quadrate, asetose. Article-2 about 1.2 times as long as wide, dorso proximal and mid margin with setules, distodorsal margin projected with small spine and one bipinnate seta (Fig. 4E). Article-3 about 1.1 times as long as wide, with distodorsal margin projected with small spine and one bipinnate seta. Article-4 elongate, about 4.2 times as long as wide; mid inner margin with one PSS; sub-distal outer margin with one simple seta and four PSS. Article-5 about 1.1 times as long as wide, sub-proximal outer margin bearing two PSS; sub-distal inner margin bearing a long simple seta. Article-6 minute, with distal margin having six simple setae of unequal lengths.</p> <p> <i>Mouthparts</i>. <i>Labrum</i> (Fig. 4F) Sub-quadrate, finely setose.</p> <p> <i>Mandibles</i> (Fig. 4G–H): left mandible (Fig. 4G), incisor with six denticles, <i>lacinia mobilis</i> broad with eight denticles; Right mandible (Fig. 4H), incisor bifid with nine denticles. Molar process of left and right mandible similar, with grinding surface showing well-developed micro-denticles (Fig. 4G–H).</p> <p> <i>Labium</i> (Fig. 5A). With inner and reduced outer lobe.</p> <p> <i>Maxillule</i> (Fig. 5B). Endite with nine distal spiniform setae, outer distal margin with several setules; palp bearing one bipinnate setulose seta.</p> <p> <i>Maxilla</i> (Fig. 5C). Subovate, asetose.</p> <p> <i>Maxilliped</i> (Figs. 5D–G, 17A–B). Basis fused, elongated, with long simple seta near palp insertion (reaching beyond distal margin of endite) (Fig. 5D). Palp article-1 slightly longer than broad, asetose; article-2 largest, widest medially, mid inner margin setulose, and inner distal margin with two simple setae and one modified spiniform seta and inner distal margin with modified spiniform seta with about four to five setules on dorsal margin and one setule on ventral margin (Figs. 5D–E, 17A–B); article-3 with inner margin having three inner very finely bipinnate setae (Fig. 5D), three sub-distal small simple setae (Fig. 5D), and one simple seta (Fig. 5F); article-4 inner margin with five inner very finely bipinnate setae, outer margin with sub-distal inner very finely bipinnate setae (Fig. 5D). <i>Endite</i> distally separated; each distal inner margin bearing two simple setae of unequal lengths and two short flat tubercles or “membranous hemispherical structures” (Sieg & Heard 1985); outer margin setulose (Fig. 5G).</p> <p> <i>Epignath</i> (Fig. 5H). Falciform, with short setae at tip.</p> <p> <i>Cheliped</i> (Figs. 6A–E, 18C). Similar in shape and size. Basis about 1.5 times as long as wide, posterior margin reaching pereonite-1; mid-ventral margin smooth, without rounded apophysis/protuberance; with sub-distal dorsal simple seta on outer margin. Merus sub-triangular, with simple seta on mid-ventral margin. Carpus about 1.6 times as long as wide; sub-distal ventral margin with two simple setae; dorsal margin setulose proximally, with two (one proximal and one distal) small simple setae. Propodus 1.6 times as long as wide, palm longer than fixed finger; ventral margin with three simple setae; outer margin with simple seta near to insertion of dactylus; inner margin with one long bipinnate seta and a row comb of ~16 small bipinnate setae near to articulation of dactylus (Fig. 6F); fixed finger with three ventral setae (Fig. 6A, C); with three (one sinuate (Fig. 6B) and two simple) sub-marginal setae on outer incisive margin (Fig. 6A), reduced rounded tooth, and one outer distal rectangular lamellar projection. Dactylus and unguis curved downward, longer than fixed finger, with row of ~nine spines ventrally (Fig. 6A); inner face with bipinnate seta on sub-proximal margin (Fig. 6C–D), integument covered by scales (Figs. 6E, 17C).</p> <p> <i>Pereopod-1</i> (Figs. 7A–B, 17D). Coxa with simple seta on anterodistal margin. Basis about 5.2 times as long as wide; sub-proximal dorsal margin with two simple seta and one PSS. Ischium wider than long, with simple seta on ventral margin. Merus slightly shorter than carpus, about 1.8 time as long as wide, obliquely articulated with carpus; inner margin with sub-distal simple seta. Carpus about 1.6 times as long as wide; distoventral margin with three distal simple setae; subdistal inner margin with one simple seta; subdistal dorsal margin with simple seta. Propodus about 2.9 times as long as wide; subdistal ventral margin with simple seta; with crown of small lanceolate setae over articulation with dactylus (Figs. 7B, 17D); subdistal dorsal margin with simple seta. Dactylus together with unguis shorter than propodus; dactylus shorter than unguis, with sub-proximal seta.</p> <p> <i>Pereopod-2</i> (Fig. 7C–E). Coxa with simple seta on anterodistal margin. Basis wider than pereopod-1, about 2.8 times as long as wide; sub-proximal dorsal margin with simple seta and two PSS. Ischium wider than long, with simple seta on ventral margin. Merus shorter than carpus, about 1.4 time as long as wide, obliquely articulated with carpus; sub-distal ventral margin with two thin simple setae. Carpus about 1.8 times as long as wide, with four distal thick bipinnate setae (Fig. 7D). Propodus about 2.7 times as long as wide; sub-distal ventral margin bearing a thick bipinnate seta (Fig. 7E); distally with crown of lanceolate setae as in pereopod-1. Dactylus together with unguis shorter than propodus; dactylus shorter than unguis, asetose.</p> <p> <i>Pereopod-3</i> (Fig. 7F). Similar to pereopod-2, but basis slightly longer. Carpus with three distal thick bipinnate setae.</p> <p> <i>Pereopod-4</i> (Fig. 7G–K). Without coxa. Basis about 2.3 times as long as wide; sub-distal ventral margin with two PSS; sub-proximal dorsal margin with two PSS. Ischium wider than long, with two simple setae on ventral margin. Merus slightly shorter than carpus, about 1.5 times as long as wide, with two distoventral thick bipinnate setae (Fig. 7H). Carpus about 1.7 times as long as wide, sub-distal dorsal margin bearing simple seta; distal margin with four thick bipinnate setae (Fig. 7I). Propodus about 3.8 times as long as wide; sub-distal ventral margin with two thin bipinnate setae (Fig. 7J); with crown of lanceolate setae over articulation with dactylus; dorsal margin with mid PSS and one distodorsal thin bipinnate setae (Fig. 7K). Dactylus and unguis curved, dactylus together with unguis shorter than propodus, dactylus with thick basal part and longer than unguis, dactylus with sub-proximal dorsal and distal margins setulose.</p> <p> <i>Pereopod-5</i> (Fig. 7L). Similar to peropod-4, but longer. Basis having only two PSS on sub-proximal dorsal margin.</p> <p> <i>Pereopod-6</i> (Fig. 7M). Similar to pereopod-5, but longer. Basis asetose. Propodus with three thin bipinnate setae on sub-distal dorsal margin.</p> <p> <i>Pleopods</i> (Fig. 7N). Five similar, well-developed, biramous pairs. Basal article nearly as long as wide, shorter than both rami with inner margin setulose. Exopod uniarticulate, with outer and distal margins bearing ~37 long plumose setae, inner dorsal margin setulose. Endopod uniarticulate, with outer and distal margins bearing ~22 long plumose setae, distal ones modified with whip-like tip; sub-distal lateral margin with seta modified with whip-like tip, inner dorsal margin setulose.</p> <p> <i>Uropods</i> (Fig. 7O). Shorter than pleotelson. Basal article about 1.1 times as long as wide, asetose. Exopod bi-articulated, shorter than endopod articles, article-1 about 2.2 times as long as wide, with simple seta on distal outer margin; article-2 about 2.5 times as long as wide, shorter than exopod article-1, with two distal simple setae of unequal lengths. Endopod bi-articulated, article-1 about 1.6 times as long as wide, with simple seta and PSS on distal inner margin and oblique row of eight PSS on outer margin. Article-2 about 1.9 times as long as wide, shorter than endopod article-1, with one PSS on inner distal margin and five simple setae of varying lengths distally.</p>Published as part of <i>Morales-Núñez, Andrés G. & Ramos-Tafur, Gabriel E., 2023, Nototanoides oliveri, a new sponge-dwelling nototanaid tanaidacean (Crustacea Tanaidomorpha, Tanaidacea) from eastern Gulf of Mexico, with an illustrated taxonomic key, and the first record of harpacticoid copepods within the marsupium of ovigerous female tanaids, pp. 242-270 in Zootaxa 5346 (3)</i> on pages 247-251, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5346.3.2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8390019">http://zenodo.org/record/8390019</a>
Ramos Sucre: estética y metafísica
No full textRamos Sucre, el gran Ramos Sucre, no tiene un locus exacto. Muchos quieren estacionarlo en el romanticismo, el modernismo e incluso el surrealismo. No obstante, su literatura, su voz, su estro escapan a todo rótulo y categoría. El poeta se estaciona en un supratiempo y un supraespacio que no tienen vínculos con las jerarquizaciones literarias. Además, vive con dureza una especie de metempsicosis que lo lleva a transformarse en todos los hombres y todos los tiempos, en todos los objetos y todos los elementos, en todas las causas y todos los efectos
Ramos Sucre: Estética y Metafísica
No full text-Ramos Sucre, el gran Ramos Sucre, no tiene un locus exacto. Muchos quieren estacionarlo en el romanticismo, el modernismo e incluso el surrealismo. No obstante, su literatura, su voz, su estro escapan a todo rótulo y categoría. El poeta se estaciona en un supratiempo y un supraespacio que no tienen vínculos con las jerarquizaciones literarias. Además, vive con dureza una especie de metempsicosis que lo lleva a transformarse en todos los hombres y todos los tiempos, en todos los objetos y todos los elementos, en todas las causas y todos los efectos
Ramos Sucre: Estética y Metafísica
No full text-Ramos Sucre, el gran Ramos Sucre, no tiene un locus exacto. Muchos quieren estacionarlo en el romanticismo, el modernismo e incluso el surrealismo. No obstante, su literatura, su voz, su estro escapan a todo rótulo y categoría. El poeta se estaciona en un supratiempo y un supraespacio que no tienen vínculos con las jerarquizaciones literarias. Además, vive con dureza una especie de metempsicosis que lo lleva a transformarse en todos los hombres y todos los tiempos, en todos los objetos y todos los elementos, en todas las causas y todos los efectos
Circamustela peignei Valenciano & Pérez-Ramos & Abella & Morales 2020, n. sp.
No full textCircamustela peignei n. sp. (Figs 2-6; 7 A-D) Mustelidae gen. et sp. indet. aff. Circamustela dechaseauxi – Valenciano 2017: 331. HOLOTYPE. — BAT-3 ’10.1570, complete cranium with C, P1-4 and M1 (Fig. 2 A-E). PARATYPE. — BAT- 3’13.1048, nearly complete left hemimandible with p2-m2 (Fig. 5 D-F). ETYMOLOGY. — In memory of Dr Stéphane Peigné, expert on Neogene carnivorans from Eurasia and Africa. HYPODIGM. — BAT-3’11.1041 (Fig. 2 F-L): fragmentary cranium, comprising the muzzle, a left fragment of the maxillary with a fragmented P3 and a complete P4 and isolated right P4; BAT-3 ’10.1246: fragmentary cranium, comprising the muzzle and attached mandible, including C, P1-4, M1 and i1-3, c, p2-4, m1-2 (Fig. 3); BAT-3 ’13.1086: nearly complete right hemimandible with p2-m2 (Fig. 5 A-C) (same individual as the paratype); BAT-3 ’10.1570A (Fig. 5 J-L): fragmentary left hemimandible with p4 and m1 (same individual as the holotype); BAT-3 ’10.1570B (Fig. 5 G-I): fragmentary right hemimandible with a broken p2 and complete p3-m1 (same individual as the holotype); Bat5-’10.G14.129: right m1 (Fig. 6). TYPE LOCALITY. — Batallones-3 (late Miocene, Vallesian, MN 10). OTHER LOCALITY. — Batallones-5 (late Miocene, Vallesian, MN 10). AGE. — Late Miocene, Vallesian, MN10. DIAGNOSIS. — Mustelid of a size comparable to Circamustela dechaseauxi. Relatively long muzzle; P1 present; P2-3 unicuspid and elongated; P3 distally widened; P4 long with conical and slender protocone mesially located, low parastyle and lingual cingulum; M1 buccolingually elongated and mesiodistally reduced, with a large parastylar area, paracone larger than metacone, the latter being distinctive, high mesially located protocone; long and low mandibular corpus; high coronoid process and shallow masseteric fossa; p2-4 elongated; p2-3 unicuspid; p4 with low distal accessory cuspid; m1 metaconid lingually expanded; oval and short m2 with small protoconid and metaconid. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS. — Differs from Circamustela dechaseauxi in more developed M1 metacone, lesser developed metastylar area, higher and mesially located protocone, lesser development of the cingulum on the lingual platform; more developed m1 metaconid, and a more conical hypoconid; Differs from Martes melibulla in the shorter mandibular corpus, reduced m1 talonid with a much shallower talonid basin, with reduced m1 entocristid and reduced m2; Differs from “ Martes ” sansaniensis, “ Martes ” filholi, Martes woodwardi, Martes ginsburgi, Pekania palaeosinensis, Pekania occulta, and Paramartes pococki, in smaller size, reduced lingual platform of the M1 and more reduced m1 talonid. DESCRIPTION Cranium and upper dentition Circamustela peignei n. sp., has a medium-sized cranium about as large as that of the American marten (Martes americana) and a long rostrum similar to that of the North American fisher (Pekania pennanti). Three fragmentary skulls have been found at Batallones-3. Specimen BAT-3’10.1570 (Fig. 2 A-E) is the most complete, and with a basal cranial length of 80.7 mm. It is dorso-ventrally compressed and the left frontal bone is collapsed. The cranium is partially crystallized in its interior, affecting the internal cavities and roots, and some superficial bone, such as of the right maxilla and pre-maxilla is dissolved. The nuchal and ventral regions are also damaged. The right zygomatic arch, left bulla, and both right mastoid process and occipital condyle are missing. The nasal aperture is broken. The orbit is large. The rostral margin of the orbit ends at the level of the mesial margin of the P4 parastyle. The postorbital processes are not preserved. The infraorbital foramen is located above the P3 and P4. It has a well-developed sagittal crest (Fig. 2A), which suggests that it was a male individual (Larivière & Jennings 2009). In caudal view (Fig. 2E), the nuchal area is triangular, rather flat, and no muscular attachments are preserved on the supraoccipital bone. The left zygomatic arch is similar to that of living martens, so it is not especially robust. The frontal process of the zygomatic arch is triangular and of moderate size. On the palate, the incisive foramina are not preserved. There is an oval concavity in the left maxilla from the canine at the P3 level. The right bulla is preserved. It is swollen, oval and rostrocaudally larger. It has three small perforations on its surface due to erosion. The scan images show a highly septate tympanic bulla, with a more developed anterior septum that partially divide the bulla (Fig. 3 B-D), as it happens in the late Miocene African mustelid Howellictis valentini (de Bonis et al. 2009). No additional features or foramina from the basicranial area are preserved. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 5FE42B44-EAD1-404B-9858-F3E546C99B03 Specimens BAT-3’11.1041 (Fig. 2 F-L) and BAT-3’10.1246 (Fig. 4) preserve the anterior part of the rostrum. Both show signals of dissolution by soil acids. BAT-3’11.1041 is not distorted. It shows a higher than broad nasal aperture and a high and relatively robust muzzle (Fig. 2 F-G). The rostral part of the cranium BAT-3’10.1246 has both hemimandibles attached, as seen in the virtual reconstruction (Fig. 4). The preserved upper dentition comprises the C, P1-4 and M1 (Figs 2-4; Table 1). Most teeth show signs of dissolution. The C is oval and long. Both BAT-3’10.1570 and BAT-3’10. 1246 have a large wear facet on the tip. There are diastemata between all the upper premolars. The P1 is robust and unicuspid. Both P2 and P3 are elongated, unicuspid and show a concave buccal wall. The P3 is distally widened. The P4 is relatively long. It possesses an eroded parastyle in BAT-3’10.1570 (Fig. 2C). There is an inflection between the parastyle and the protocone. The protocone is very isolated and mesially located. Additional P4s associated with the crania BAT-3’11.1041 (Fig. 2 H-L) and BAT-3’10.1246 (Fig. 4E) indicate that the parastyle is of moderate size. The protocone is conical and slender with moderate height. A lingual cingulum is present on the whole length of the lingual wall (Fig. 2 K-L).Two M1 are preserved in the crania BAT-3’10.1570 and BAT-3’10.1246. The M1 BAT-3’10.1570 is buccolingually elongated and mesiodistally reduced (Fig. 2C). It has a large parastylar area. The paracone is larger than the metacone. Both mesial and distal walls are very straight. The protocone is high and mesially located. The lingual platform is reduced in comparison with living gulonines (e.g., Martes martes, Martes foina, Pekania pennanti). The CT-scan allowed us to examine the M1 BAT-3’10.1246 (Fig. 4E). It is broken at the paracone-metacone level and the metacone is dissolved.Its overall morphology is close to BAT-3’10.1570, showing a short lingual platform and a high and distally placed protocone (Figs 2C; 4E). Mandibles and lower dentition Three incomplete mandibles have been found in Batallones-3 comprising i1-3, c, p2-4 and m1-2 (Figs 4, 5; Table 2). Both BAT-3’10.1570A and B are poorly preserved and the mandibular corpus and teeth are dissolved and carbonated, having several small concretions on the surface (Fig. 5 G-K). The mandible of C. peignei n. sp. is slender with a low mandibular corpus.Laterally, there are two rounded mental foramina, one under the distal part of the p2 and the other beneath the middle cuspid of the p3. The mandibular symphysis is elongated and curved (Fig. 5 G-H). Its medial surface is rough, and the attachment of the fibrocartilage pad reaches the mesial part of the p3. The coronoid process is high, sharp and vertically oriented. The masseteric fossa is shallow, although in BAT-3’10.1570A it is deeper. Its rostral margin lies at the level of the m2. The tooth row is straight and is aligned with the articular process. The articular process is large and close to the angular process. The angular process is robust and caudally directed. It is more developed in BAT-3’10.1570A. BAT-3’10.1246 preserves all the lower incisors on both sides (Fig. 4). The i1 is very small and peg-like. The right i1 only preserves part of the root. The i2 and i3 are bilobed, with i3 mesiodistally wider. The root of the i2 is imbricated between the i1 and the 13. The canine is large and has a lingual cingulid (Fig. 4 F-I). BAT-3’10.1570A also shows an alveolus for p1. The p2-3 are elongated and unicuspid. The cuspid of p2 is placed mesially, but in the p3 it is located in the middle portion of the tooth. Both p3-4 have high mesial and distal cingulids. The p4 has a tiny distal accessory cuspid (Fig. 4 F-I, 4A-F), which is more developed in BAT-3’10.1570A (Fig. 5 J-L). The m1 is long; its trigonid forms more than two thirds of the total length of the tooth; the protoconid is higher than the paraconid. The metaconid is distinct, attached to the protoconid but not exceeding its posterior edge. It is lingually extended (Figs 4F, H-I; 5Q; 6), and is more developed in BAT-3’13.1086 (Fig. 5 A-C), and in the specimen from Batallones-5 (Fig. 6). The maximum width is located at the protoconid-metaconid level. The talonid is reduced in length. The hypoconid is low and lingually bevelled (Figs 4 F-I; 5C, E). There is no entocristid; instead a posterior cristid of the metaconid extends along the lingual edge of the talonid, reaching the hypoconulid. Between the hypoconid and the aforementioned edge there is a shallow basin. The hypoconulid is more developed in BAT-3’10.1570A (Fig. 5 J-L) and BAT-5’10.G14.129 (Fig. 6). The m2 is reduced and oval. Its protoconid and metaconid are of similar height (Fig. 5 A-C).Published as part of Valenciano, Alberto, Pérez-Ramos, Alejandro, Abella, Juan & Morales, Jorge, 2020, A new hypercarnivorous mustelid (Mammalia, Carnivora, Mustelidae) from Batallones, late Miocene (MN 10), Torrejón de Velasco, Madrid, Spain, pp. 103-121 in Geodiversitas 42 (8) on pages 108-112, DOI: 10.5252/geodiversitas2020v42a8, http://zenodo.org/record/382068
Michigan State University's 2003 Chicano History Month read-in
No full textRosa Morales hosts Michigan State University's Chicano History Month Read-In. Diana Rivera reads from Manuel Ramos' "Luis Montez Mystery Series." Eighth grade student Clinton Mireles reads four original poems. Sheila Contreras reads several selections of poetry and prose. Rudy Hernandez reads Nick Vacca's "Message to the People." Herminia Ortega reads a selection by L.A. Cris X from an anthology of Chicano literature titled "Infinite Divisions." Rudy Ramos reads Gary Soto's memoir "Living Up the Street." Rosa Morales reads the poetry of Octavio Paz in both Spanish and English. Dionicio Valdes reads from "Adventures of the Chicano Kid" by Max Martinez. Selections read are all held in the Cesar E. Chavez Collection at the MSU Library. The read-in was coordinated by Tama Hamilton-Wray and Diana Rivera
. 9 Año 3 (2004) octubre-diciembre. Señales de humo
No full text- Cerrando un capítulo. Recuperación del cáliz robado en Tres, Sonora por Raquel Padilla Ramos. - Centro Histórico de Hermosillo por Adolfo García Robles. - Editorial por Carlos Villegas Ivich. - Un recorrido arqueológico por la nueva carreta costera. Tramo Puerto Peñasco - Golfo de Santa Clara por César A. Quijada. - Segundo Taller para Responsables del Programa de Catalogación de Bienes Muebles en Recintos Religiosos por Ana Luz Ramírez Zavala. - Temporada de campo en el sitio arqueológico "La Playa" por Cristina García. - Sueño y decepción de la colonización del Noroeste de México por Juan José Gracida Romo. - Fracasos que aportan por Juan José Gracida Romo. - La Hacienda pública municipal en Sonora, en la primera mitad del siglo XIX por Esperanza Donjuan Espinoza. - La importancia de la Antropología e Historia en la educación preescolar por Raquel Padilla Ramos y Juan José Gracida Romo. - El narcotráfico de los 70's en Hermosillo. De la cultura de la violencia a la violencia representada por Suhei Lara López. - ¿Sabías que... por Eréndira Contreras Barragán. - ¿Migrante yo? por Adolfo García Robles. - Crónicas de la Guerra del Yaqui por Guadalupe Piña Ortiz. - Vida académica y editorial por Cristina García. - Música y raíces de Iberoamérica por Marta Olivia Solís Zataraín. - Recientes descubrimientos en las excavaciones de la Misión de Cocóspera por Júpiter Martínez. - ¿Qué es el Patrimonio cultural? por Jorge A. Morales A. - Dicen que la muerte es triste por Verónica Gutiérrez López
Comiençan los proverbios morales
No full textDatos de autor e tít. tomados de comezo de textoDatos de ed. tomados de colofóna\p3\s, B-F\p8\s, G\p3\sFalto de por
- …
