1,720,976 research outputs found
Challenges of a Data Ecosystem for scientific data
No full textData Ecosystems (DE) are used across various fields and applications. They facilitate collaboration between organizations, such as companies or research institutions, enabling them to share data and services. A DE can boost research outcomes by managing and extracting value from the increasing volume of generated and shared data in the last decades. However, the adoption of DE solutions for scientific data by R&D departments and scientific communities is still difficult. Scientific data are challenging to manage, and, as a result, a considerable part of this information still needs to be annotated and organized in order to be shared. This work discusses the challenges of employing DE in scientific domains and the corresponding potential mitigations. First, scientific data and their typologies are contextualized, then their unique characteristics are discussed. Typical properties regarding their high heterogeneity and uncertainty make assessing their consistency and accuracy problematic. In addition, this work discusses the specific requirements expressed by the scientific communities when it comes to integrating a DE solution into their workflow. The unique properties of scientific data and domain-specific requirements create a challenging setting for adopting DEs. The challenges are expressed as general research questions, and this work explores the corresponding solutions in terms of data management aspects. Finally, the paper presents a real-world scenario with more technical details
Data Ecosystems for Scientific Experiments: Managing Combustion Experiments and Simulation Analyses in Chemical Engineering
Full text linkThe development of scientific predictive models has been of great interest over the decades. A scientific model is capable of forecasting domain outcomes without the necessity of performing expensive experiments. In particular, in combustion kinetics, the model can help improving the combustion facilities and the fuel efficiency reducing the pollutants. At the same time, the amount of available scientific data has increased and helped speeding up the continuous cycle of model improvement and validation. This has also opened new opportunities for leveraging a large amount of data to support knowledge extraction. However, experiments are affected by several data quality problems since they are a collection of information over several decades of research, each characterized by different representation formats and reasons of uncertainty. In this context, it is necessary to develop an automatic data ecosystem capable of integrating heterogeneous information sources while maintaining a quality repository. We present an innovative approach to data quality management from the chemical engineering domain, based on an available prototype of a scientific framework, SciExpeM, which has been significantly extended. We identified a new methodology from the model development research process that systematically extracts knowledge from the experimental data and the predictive model. In the paper, we show how our general framework could support the model development process, and save precious research time also in other experimental domains with similar characteristics, i.e., managing numerical data from experiments
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Shock tube study on ignition delay of hydrogen and evaluation of various kinetic models
No full textShock tube study on ignition delay of hydrogen and evaluation of various kinetic model
Ignition delay times of methane and hydrogen highly diluted in carbon dioxide at high pressures up to 300 atm
No full textIgnition delay times of methane and hydrogen highly diluted in carbon dioxide at high pressures up to 300 at
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
From a prototype to a data ecosystem for experimental data and predictive models
Full text linkData ecosystems have been a game-changer in many industrial applications and research fields, speeding up their development. The possibility of collecting large amounts of data within the same environment has also raised some common questions to all application domains, including the quality of the data collected and their reliability and trustworthiness. From experience gained collaborating with the chemical engineering field, this paper raises some discussion points related to the management of experimental data and predictive models within a data ecosystem. In fact, this type of data poses new requirements that require specific treatment before being implemented in a traditional data ecosystem
- …
