1,722,227 research outputs found

    Hyrum R. Spencer

    No full text
    Manuscript (2 pages), an unidentified student\u27s brief biography of Hyrum R. Spencer, early settler and LDS BIshop of Magna, Uta

    J. R. Spencer, Jackson's Machinery of Justice

    No full text
    J. R. Spencer, Jackson's Machinery of Justice. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Vol. 41 N°3, Juillet-septembre 1989. pp. 823-824

    J. R. Spencer, La procédure pénale anglaise

    No full text
    J. R. Spencer, La procédure pénale anglaise. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Vol. 50 N°3, Juillet-septembre 1998. pp. 985-986

    J. R. Spencer, La procédure pénale anglaise

    No full text
    J. R. Spencer, La procédure pénale anglaise. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Vol. 50 N°3, Juillet-septembre 1998. pp. 985-986

    J. R. Spencer, Jackson's Machinery of Justice

    No full text
    J. R. Spencer, Jackson's Machinery of Justice. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Vol. 41 N°3, Juillet-septembre 1989. pp. 823-824

    Jean Pradel. Droit pénal comparé

    No full text
    R. Spencer John. Jean Pradel. Droit pénal comparé. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Vol. 56 N°1,2004. pp. 260-261

    Quelques observations préliminaires

    No full text
    R. Spencer John. Quelques observations préliminaires. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Vol. 50 N°3, Juillet-septembre 1998. pp. 823-826

    Jean Pradel. Droit pénal comparé

    No full text
    R. Spencer John. Jean Pradel. Droit pénal comparé. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Vol. 56 N°1,2004. pp. 260-261

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore