1,720,992 research outputs found

    Russell bodies as a model of ER storage diseases

    No full text
    Protein accumulation represents the consequence of an altered cellular homeostasis leading to an imbalance between synthesis and disposal. Cells adopt a number of strategies to cope with this imbalance: through the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR), intracellular chaperons are increased to facilitate protein folding, and the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) expands to accommodate increased concentration of ER resident proteins. The induction of autophagy is also a strategy adopted to face the synthesis of aberrant proteins. Our cellular model of protein accumulation regards mutant immunoglobulin: Ig-μ chain that lacks the first constant domain (μ∆CH1 chain). These aberrant chains can neither exit from, nor are efficiently degraded in the ER. As a consequence they accumulate generating dilated cisternae known as Russell bodies. Russell bodies are frequently detected in lymphoproliferative diseases, especially in disorders of secretory B cells. Condensation of aberrant μ∆CH1 chains can occur in different sub-cellular locations: when Ig-L chains are produced detergent insoluble aggregates form in the rough ER; without L chains, aggregation occurs in ERGIC compartment. We are interested to define whether and which cellular mechanisms are active or are impaired by the synthesis of aberrant Ig-μ chains assaying: i.e. ER stress, ER expansion, Autophagy modulation in our inducible cellular model (Hela-tet off) of Russell bodies formation. Our aim is to define if Russell bodies structures are a cell defence mechanism against proteotoxicit

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore