1,720,965 research outputs found
Classification of packed executables for accurate computer virus detection
Executable packing is the most common technique used by computer virus writers to obfuscate malicious code and evade detection by anti-virus software. Universal unpackers have been proposed that can detect and extract encrypted code from packed executables, therefore potentially revealing hidden viruses that can then be detected by traditional signature-based anti-virus software. However, universal unpackers are computationally expensive and scanning large collections of executables looking for virus infections may take several hours or even days. In this paper we apply pattern recognition techniques for fast detection of packed executables. The objective is to efficiently and accurately distinguish between packed and non-packed executables, so that only executables detected as packed will be sent to an universal unpacker, thus saving a significant amount of processing time. We show that our system achieves very high detection accuracy of packed executables with a low average processing time
PeerRush : mining for unwanted P2P traffic
In this paper we present PeerRush, a novel system for the identification of unwanted P2P traffic. Unlike most previous work, PeerRush goes beyond P2P traffic detection, and can accurately categorize the detected P2P traffic and attribute it to specific P2P applications, including malicious applications such as P2P botnets. PeerRush achieves these results without the need of deep packet inspection, and can accurately identify applications that use encrypted P2P traffic.
We implemented a prototype version of PeerRush and performed an extensive evaluation of the system over a variety of P2P traffic datasets. Our results show that we can detect all the considered types of P2P traffic with up to 99.5% true positives and 0.1% false positives. Furthermore, PeerRush can attribute the P2P traffic to a specific P2P application with a misclassification rate of 0.68% or less
McBoost: Boosting scalability in malware collection and analysis using statistical classification of executables
In this work, we propose Malware Collection Booster (McBoost), a fast statistical malware detection tool that is intended to improve the scalability of existing malware collection and analysis approaches. Given a large collection of binaries that may contain both hitherto unknown malware and benign executables, McBoost reduces the overall time of analysis by classifying and filtering out the least suspicious binaries and passing only the most suspicious ones to a detailed binary analysis process for signature extraction. The McBoost framework consists of a classifier specialized in detecting whether an executable is packed or not, a universal unpacker based on dynamic binary analysis, and a classifier specialized in distinguishing between malicious or benign code. We developed a proof-of-concept version of McBoost and evaluated it on 5,586 malware and 2,258 benign programs. McBoost has an accuracy of 87.3%, and an Area Under the ROC curve (AUC) equal to 0.977. Our evaluation also shows that McBoost reduces the overall time of analysis to only a fraction (e.g., 13.4%) of the computation time that would otherwise be required to analyze large sets of mixed malicious and benign executables
PeerRush : mining for unwanted P2P traffic
In this paper we present PeerRush, a novel system for the identification of unwanted P2P traffic. Unlike most previous work, PeerRush goes beyond P2P traffic detection, and can accurately categorize the detected P2P traffic and attribute it to specific P2P applications, including malicious applications such as P2P botnets. PeerRush achieves these results without the need of deep packet inspection, and can accurately identify applications that use encrypted P2P traffic.
We implemented a prototype version of PeerRush and performed an extensive evaluation of the system over a variety of P2P traffic datasets. Our results show that we can detect all the considered types of P2P traffic with up to 99.5% true positives and 0.1% false positives. Furthermore, PeerRush can attribute the P2P traffic to a specific P2P application with a misclassification rate of 0.68% or less
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Alarm clustering for intrusion detection systems in computer networks
Abstract. Until recently, network administrators manually arranged alarms produced by Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) to attain a highlevel description of threats. As the number of alarms is increasingly growing, automatic tools for alarm clustering have been proposed to provide such a high level description of the attack scenario. In addition, it has been shown that effective threat analysis require the fusion of different sources of information, such as different IDSs, firewall logs, etc. In this paper, we propose a new strategy to perform alarm clustering which produces unified descriptions of attacks from multiple alarms. Tests have been performed on a live network where commercial and open-source IDSs analyzed network traffic
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
