1,725,582 research outputs found
R. King
No full text"Bdr. R. King WX. 38950 2nd AA Bty. Darwin".Bombardier R. King. WX. 38950. 2nd Anti Aircraft Battery. Darwin
Congressman Cecil R. King
No full textScan of photo of Cecil R. King, Democratic Congressman from California from 1942 to 1969. Photo inscribed "with all good wishes to Mike Masaoka, cordially, Cecil R. King," and probably dates from the late 1940s or 1950s
Dr. John R. King
No full textObituary of Dr. John R. King, born February 8, 1915 in Westfield, Massachusetts. Resided in Monroe, Michigan
Photograph, Clarence R. King
No full textA portrait of Clarence R. King, the first director of the U.S. Geological Survey from 1879 to 1881.https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/parker_photographs/1053/thumbnail.jp
occidentale
No full textAgeratina occidentalis (Hook.) R. King & H. RobinsonWestern eupatorium, Western joepiweed, Western snakerootEupatorium occidentaleLassen Highway near Diamond Poin
occidentale
No full textAgeratina occidentalis (Hook.) R. King & H. RobinsonWestern eupatorium, Western joepiweed, Western snakerootEupatorium occidentalesummit area of Diamond Park7950 fee
Margaret R King, Kappa Delta Epsilon
No full textMargaret R King was a student at Jacksonville State College (now Jacksonville State University) in the 1960s. In 1967 she was a member of Kappa Delta Epsilon.https://digitalcommons.jsu.edu/lib-ac-histimg/13655/thumbnail.jp
George R. King - 'kingmaker' in a regional city
No full textGeorge R. King - 'kingmaker' in a regional cit
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
