1,720,961 research outputs found
Correlazioni biologiche e balistiche nelle morti per arma da fuoco. Zacchia, XIX, 199, 2001
No full textDetection of make-up masked scars and tattoos by infrared camera: an easy surveillance aid. Atti 10th Biennal Scientific Meeting of I.A.C.I., Settembre 11-14, 2002, Bari. Centro Stampa Università di Bari, 2002
No full textValidità dell’indagine radiologica per la diagnosi precoce del trauma cranico. Segnalazione di due casi ad esito infausto
No full textRicostruzione delle traiettorie di proiettili: dal disegno al “rendering” computerizzato
No full textStudio epidemiologico descrittivo delle vittime di un grande disastro edilizio (Foggia, novembre 1999). Zacchia, XIX, 515, 2001
No full textIpercaricamento delle armi semiautomatiche e ricostruzione di eventi in Balistica Forense. V Giorn. Medico-Legali Romane – IV Giorn. Medico-Legali Europee. Roma, 26-28 giugno 2001
No full textMorte improvvisa secondaria a tumore primitivo del sistema nervoso centrale (ganglioglioma del midollo allungato). Zacchia, XIX, 741, 2001
No full textInjuries of an armored vehicle occupant during armed robbery: a case report. Atti Annual Meeting AAFS, Chicago, Illinois, 17-22 febbraio 2003, pag.217
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
