1,720,959 research outputs found

    Species differences in the sensitivity to GnRH analogs

    No full text
    The effects of several GnRH agonists and antagonists with high biological activity, have been investigated in rats, mice, rabbits and monkeys. Striking differences exist in the response of different species to the antigonadal and antipituitary effects of these peptides. Of all the animals studied, the rat is the most sensitive. The magnitude of the response to GnRH agonists seems to depend on the sensitivity of the pituitary and the presence of GnRH receptors in the target organs. Findings from animal models require careful interpretation before predictions can be made regarding their possible effects in the human

    Unexpected effects of nalmefene, a new opiate antagonist, on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in the male rat

    No full text
    In order to gain additional information on the role of brain opioid peptides in the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, we studied the effects of nalmefene, a new opiate antagonist, on gonadotropin and testosterone secretion in male rats. The results were compared with those obtained with naloxone, a well-studied antagonist. Acute injections of either nalmefene or naloxone (2 mg/kg) produced 4-fold increases in LH and testosterone secretion. In castrated male rats treated with testosterone propionate (TP), nalmefene (10 mg/kg) reversed the androgen negative feedback on LH secretion; surprisingly, when higher doses (25 and 50 mg/kg) were injected, the compound lost its ability to antagonize the testosterone-induced inhibition of LH levels. In contrast, naloxone was able to increase LH levels in TP-treated castrated rats even at the highest dose tested (50 mg/kg). Chronic administration of these antagonists resulted in suppression of the acute release of LH and T secretion in nalmefene-treated but not in naloxone-injected animals. These data are consistent with previous observations suggesting that opioid peptides a) exert a tonic inhibitory effect on LH and testosterone production and b) participate in the negative androgen-induced feedback control of LH secretion. Our results also show that the antagonistic action of nalmefene, but not naloxone, is reversed when higher doses are used or following chronic administration

    Species differences in the sensitivity to a GnRH antagonist

    No full text
    The effects of the potent GnRH antagonist [Ac-D-NAL(2)1, 4F-D-Phe2, D-Trp3, D-Arg6]-GnRH (GnRH-A), on ovulation in mature rats and rabbits and on serum LH and FSH levels in ovariectomized rats, rabbits and mice were investigated. Dose-response studies showed that 1 microgram (4 micrograms/kg) of GnRH-A was sufficient to inhibit ovulation completely in cycling rats, while 500 micrograms (135 micrograms/kg) were required to inhibit mating induced ovulation in 8 of 11 rabbits. Two of the 3 rabbits which ovulated in spite of the antagonist treatment had delayed LH surges. The mean LH peak of these 3 rabbits was significantly (p less than 0.001) lower than that of controls. Pituitary response to GnRH-A, as measured by plasma gonadotropin levels following GnRH-A treatment in ovariectomized rabbits, rats and mice showed highest sensitivity of the rat to the inhibitory effects of the antagonist. Serum FSH levels were slightly suppressed in rats, but remained undiminished in rabbits and mice. The difference in the response of the three species to the antipituitary effects of GnRH-A is most likely due to differences in the affinity of the pituitary GnRH receptor to the antagonist

    Regulation of pituitary gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors by androgens in the male rabbit

    No full text
    The regulation of pituitary GnRH receptors was studied in adult male rabbits after castration and androgen replacement with testosterone (T) or 7 alpha-methyl-19-nortestosterone acetate (U-15,614; T analog) supplied by Silastic capsules implanted sc. Castration increased pituitary GnRH receptors significantly, from 99.3 to 329.5 fmol/mg protein within 4 weeks, without a change in the equilibrium association constant. Serum LH concentrations increased from 0.45 to maximum levels of 2.6 ng/ml by day 8 after orchiectomy; these levels persisted throughout the 4 weeks of study. Serum FSH reached maximum levels of 33.6 ng/ml 5 days after castration. T replacement with 250, 500, and 1000 micrograms/kg X day, prevented a postcastration rise in both pituitary GnRH receptor concentrations and gonadotropin secretion, while 100 micrograms/kg X day prevented an increase in GnRH receptors, but did not completely inhibit hypersecretion of gonadotropins. Administration of T analog at doses of 6.25 and 12.5 micrograms/kg X day partially suppressed the castration-induced increase in pituitary GnRH receptor concentrations, while 25, 50, and 100 micrograms/kg X day suppressed GnRH-binding sites to the levels found in intact controls in 15 of 16 rabbits. By contrast, none of the T analog doses was able to prevent completely LH and FSH hypersecretion. The fact that both T and T analog induced dose-dependent stimulation of prostate and seminal vesicle weights indicates that there are tissue-specific differences in the sensitivity to androgens. We conclude that in the male rabbit 1) pituitary GnRH receptors significantly increase after castration; 2) this increase may partially mediate the postcastration hypersecretion of LH and FSH; 3) castration-induced effects can be prevented by androgen replacement. These results are similar to those obtained in rats, where castration increases LHRH receptors, but contrast with results in mice and hamsters, where castration either reduces or does not change receptor levels. This indicates significant species differences in the response of pituitary GnRH receptor concentrations to elimination of the negative feedback effects of androgens

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore