2 research outputs found
WHAT FACTORS CAUSE DIFFERENCES IN ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NORTH BANTEN AND SOUTH BANTEN?
No full textThis study examines the factors contributing to the economic growth imbalance between North and South Banten. Using panel data from six regencies and cities in North Banten and two regencies in South Banten for the period 2010-2020, the research employs both descriptive qualitative analysis and quantitative regression analysis. The findings reveal that in North Banten, factors such as foreign direct investment (FDI), domestic direct investment (DDI), electricity, human development index (HDI), industrial sector, and service sector positively and significantly influence economic growth. However, road infrastructure and the agriculture sector show no significant effect. In contrast, in South Banten, only the agriculture and service sectors have a positive significant impact, while FDI, DDI, road infrastructure, electricity, HDI, and the industrial sector do not significantly affect economic growth. To address the economic growth imbalance in Banten, policies should focus on enhancing investment interest, improving infrastructure, developing human resources, and maximizing key production sectors
Outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting in a tertiary-care center in Pakistan
No full text© The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention are revascularization options for significant coronary artery disease. While international data support the use of coronary artery bypass in high-risk groups, regional data on outcomes in these groups are rare. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass for left main and multivessel disease. Methods: Two thousand eight hundred and fifty-one patients undergoing coronary artery bypass at the Aga Khan University Hospital from 2006 to 2013 were included; patients undergoing redo surgery were excluded. Demographic data, comorbidities, angiography findings, in-hospital complications, one-month and one-year follow-up were analyzed.Results: Of the 2851 patients, 568 had left main disease (group 1) and 2283 (group 2) had multivessel disease (≥2 vessels excluding the left main). Group 1 had significantly more chronic lung disease, cardiogenic shock, and congestive heart failure than group 2 (p\u3c0.001); 50.6% of patients were diabetic and 71.8% were hypertensive. Mortality was 5.1% and 2.2% during hospital stay, 6.5% and 2.6% at 30 days, and 6.7% and 2.7% at 1 year in groups 1 and 2, respectively.CONCLUSION: Our comparable results and international data advocate revision of the current practice of using percutaneous coronary intervention over coronary artery bypass in the developing world. Institutional results are essential to determine the outcome of coronary artery bypass in high-risk populations with a high burden of diabetes and hypertension. We noted increased complications and mortality in patients with left main rather than multivessel disease
