1,720,961 research outputs found
Disruptive Innovation In Business Competition Law In The Online Transportation Sector: Legal Issues And Challenges
Disruptive innovation is when new technologies or novel business models penetrate established markets and bring major changes to the industry. Disruptive innovation differs from incremental innovation by introducing completely new products or services or providing solutions that are more cost-effective, convenient, or effective. This research aims to examine how disruptive innovation in the internet transportation sector impacts the application and efficacy of Competition Law in Indonesia. Qualitative methodologies are utilized to investigate the intricate legal difficulties and challenges inside the realm of online transportation. The research findings indicate that the introduction of new technologies can lead to detrimental rivalry between conventional service providers and online platforms, potentially diminishing service quality and impacting regulatory efficacy. Market dominance of internet transportation platforms can lead to monopolistic or oligopolistic practices, which may result in collusion and the misuse of market power, negatively impacting consumers and competitors. Consumer protection is a crucial concern in this scenario, since it involves ensuring security, transparency, and data privacy in online transportation services
Interfaith Marriage in the Human Rights Perspective and the Compilation of Islamic Law
Becoming a husband and wife via marriage is a sacred relationship shared by a woman and a man. Basically, marriage is governed by the laws of each religion. Interfaith marriage is one of the phenomenon that takes place in Indonesia. Some of these weddings were consummated in secret, but most of them were done so in public. Interfaith unions are likewise forbidden by Islam, according to Surah Al-Baqarah verse 221. Law Number 1 of 1974, article 2, also forbids interfaith unions. Interfaith weddings are still common in Indonesia, therefore this tradition has generated criticism even in the present day. Normative legal research is the methodology employed in this legal study. The findings of this study demonstrate that interfaith marriage is forbidden by the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) and Human Rights (HAM), which states that it is against God\u27s mandates. All major religions forbid its adherents from marrying outside of their own faith. In order to compel all citizens to abide by the relevant legal regulations, the Marriage Law and the Compilation of Islamic Law both forbid interfaith marriages. The highest human right in terms of human rights is divinity, which means that all individuals are required to follow their god\u27s laws. The primary issue under investigation is how Islamic law and human rights relate to interfaith marriage and the legal ramifications of the human rights perspective on such marriages, which forbids and does not accommodate interfaith unions because all of the freedoms and rights outlined in the declaration are subject to sharia, or Islamic law
Election Law Challenges in the Digital Era
There are many benefits that can be gained from the digitalization process, but there are still many problems that exist in Indonesia. The discourse on digitizing election law enforcement is still a matter of debate. For this reason, it must be studied seriously and actually implemented. Researchers analyze based on normative juridical studies related to digitalization problems and offer solutions to overcome obstacles to digitalization of elections and law enforcement. The advancement of science and technology has both beneficial and detrimental effects on human existence. Similarly, the legal metanarrative must confront the reality of cyberspace as one of the technological advancements. A novel and all-encompassing strategy is required to solve legal metanarratives\u27 helplessness in the face of digital obstacles
Pidana Ujaran Kebencian Melalui Media Sosial Ditinjau dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE)
Ujaran kebencian adalah perbuatan yang dapat berupa tindak pidana yang diatur dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) yang berbentuk penghinaan, pencemaran nama baik, penistaan, perbuatan tidak menyenangkan, memprovokasi, menghasut, dan penyebaran berita bohong. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan undang-undang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pengaturan hukum terhadap pelaku ujaran kebencian di media sosial diatur dalam ketentuan Pasal 28 ayat (1) dan (2) jo. Pasal 45 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Selain ketentuan yang terdapat dalam UU ITE. Penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku ujaran kebencian dilakukan oleh Kepolisian dengan berpedoman pada Surat Edaran Kapolri Nomor: SE/06/X/2015 tentang Penanganan Ujaran kebencian (Hate Speech). Pada angka 3 terdapat upaya preventif yang dapat dilakukan oleh pihak kepolisian dalam menindak ujaran kebencian. Namun apabila upaya preventif tidak berhasil, Kepolisian dapat melakukan upaya represif yaitu dengan melakukan penegakan hukum terhadap penegakan hukum terhadap pasal-pasal yang mengatur ketentuan terkait ujaran kebencian, salah satunya terdapat dalam Pasal 28 jo. Pasal 45 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
