1,720,975 research outputs found
[Probus] instituta artium
No full textEichenfeld, J. von & S. Endlicher, eds. (1837) Analecta grammatica, maximam partem anecdota, Wien, xxvii & 571 p. De La Chica Cassinello, G., ed. (1991), Scriptores Latini de re metrica. Concordantiae, indices. VIII. Ps. Probus, Granada, xv & 602 p. Barnett, F. J. (2006), “The second appendix to Probus”, Classical Quarterly, n. s. 56.1, p. 257-278. Barwick, K. (1919), "Die sogenannte Appendix Probi", Hermes, 54, p. 409-422. Bücheler, F. (1907), "Coniectanea", Rheinisches Museum, 62..
[Probus] appendix
No full textAsperti, S. & M. Passalacqua, eds. (2014), Appendix Probi (GL IV 193-204), Firenze, lxix & 101 p. Da Silva Neto, S. (1956³ (1946)), Fontes do Latim Vulgar. O Appendix Probi , Rio de Janeiro. Eichenfeld, J. von & S. Endlicher, eds. (1837) Analecta grammatica, maximam partem anecdota, Wien, xxvii & 571 p. Stok, F., ed. (1997), Probi Appendix 4, Napoli, 214 p. De La Chica Cassinello, G., ed. (1991), Scriptores Latini de re metrica. Concordantiae, indices. VIII. Ps. Probus, Granada, xv & 60..
[Probus] de nomine
No full textEichenfeld, J. von & S. Endlicher, eds. (1837) Analecta grammatica, maximam partem anecdota, Wien, xxvii & 571 p. Passalacqua, M., ed. (1984), Tre testi grammaticali bobbiesi. GL V, 555-566; 634-654; GL IV, 207-216 Keil, Roma, xxvii & 81 p. De La Chica Cassinello, G., ed. (1991), Scriptores Latini de re metrica. Concordantiae, indices. VIII. Ps. Probus, Granada, xv & 602 p. Adkin, N. (2011), “What did Pan say to Syrinx? Etymology in Ovid, Metamorphoses, I, 698-712”, Eirene, 47, p. 144..
Catholica nominum et uerborum / digital edition published by digilibLT digital library of late-Latin texts
No full texttranscodifica di base da rtf a xml-tei piero colombo - step srl
Testo Marinone, GL-CD
Controllo marcatura XML-TEI Giulia Casalegno
HomePage del progetto: https://digiliblt.uniupo.it/
Documentazione: https://digiliblt.uniupo.it/progetto.ph
Vitae Vergilii / digital edition published by digilibLT digital library of late-Latin texts
No full textCorrezione linguistica Fabio Stok
Codifica XML Nadia Rosso
HomePage del progetto: https://digiliblt.uniupo.it/
Documentazione: https://digiliblt.uniupo.it/progetto.ph
Instituta artium / digital edition published by digilibLT digital library of late-Latin texts
No full texttranscodifica di base da rtf a xml-tei piero colombo - step srl
Testo Marinone, GL-CD
Controllo marcatura XML-TEI Beatrice Bersani
HomePage del progetto: https://digiliblt.uniupo.it/
Documentazione: https://digiliblt.uniupo.it/progetto.ph
De ultimis syllabis liber / digital edition published by digilibLT digital library of late-Latin texts
No full texttranscodifica di base da rtf a xml-tei piero colombo - step srl
Testo Marinone, GL-CD
Controllo marcatura XML-TEI Alberto Crotto
HomePage del progetto: https://digiliblt.uniupo.it/
Documentazione: https://digiliblt.uniupo.it/progetto.ph
De nomine / digital edition published by digilibLT digital library of late-Latin texts
No full texttranscodifica di base da rtf a xml-tei piero colombo - step srl
Testo Marinone, GL-CD
Controllo marcatura XML-TEI Giulia Casalegno
HomePage del progetto: https://digiliblt.uniupo.it/
Documentazione: https://digiliblt.uniupo.it/progetto.ph
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
