1,721,039 research outputs found
The SNARC effect: a preregistered study on the interaction of horizontal, vertical, and sagittal spatial–numerical associations
Get PDFSmall numbers are processed faster through left-sided than right-sided responses, whereas large numbers are processed faster through right-sided than left-sided responses [i.e., the Spatial–Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect]. This effect suggests that small numbers are mentally represented on the left side of space, whereas large numbers are mentally represented on the right side of space, along a mental number line. The SNARC effect has been widely investigated along the horizontal Cartesian axis (i.e., left–right). Aleotti et al. (Cognition 195:104111, 2020), however, have shown that the SNARC effect could also be observed along the vertical (i.e., small numbers-down side vs. large numbers-up side) and the sagittal axis (i.e., small numbers-near side vs. large numbers-far side). Here, we investigated whether the three Cartesian axes could interact to elicit the SNARC effect. Participants were asked to decide whether a centrally presented Arabic digit was odd or even. Responses were collected through an ad hoc-made response box on which the SNARC effect could be compatible for one, two, or three Cartesian axes. The results showed that the higher the number of SNARC-compatible Cartesian axes, the stronger the SNARC effect. We suggest that numbers are represented in a three-dimensional number space defined by interacting Cartesian axes
The importance of time limits in detecting signs of left visual peripersonal neglect: a multiple single-case, pilot study
No full textWe developed a new visual search test to assess signs of left visual peripersonal neglect. Five right-hemisphere-damaged patients, 10 healthy controls, and 10 orthopedic controls were administered the test in four conditions: easy task (no distractors)/time-limited (45’’), easy task (no distractors)/time-unlimited, difficult task (distractors)/time-limited (45’’), difficult task (distractors)/time-unlimited. With respect to controls, most RHDP showed signs of left visual peripersonal neglect in the time-limited condition, but not in the time-unlimited condition, particularly on the difficult task. We suggest that the presence of appropriate time limits, in difficult visual search tasks, could considerably improve the diagnosis of left visual peripersonal neglect
A clinical diary and timeline to monitor joint therapy for Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia
No full textN/
Order versus chaos: The impact of structure on number-space associations
No full textThe Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect has been observed with different stimuli, beside Arabic numerals, such as written/spoken number words, sequences of acoustic stimuli, and groups of elements. Here we investigated how the enumeration of sets of elements can be affected by the spatial configuration of the displayed stimuli with regard to the emergence of the SNARC effect. To this aim, we asked participants to perform a magnitude comparison task with structured (i.e., dice-like) and unstructured (i.e., random) patterns of rectangles. With this manipulation, we sought to explore the presence of the SNARC effect in relation to the structure of the displayed visual stimuli. The results showed that the spatial arrangement of rectangles does not impact visual enumeration processes leading to the SNARC effect. An unexpected reversal of the size effect for unstructured stimuli was also observed. We speculate that the presence of a similar SNARC effect, both with structured and unstructured stimuli, indicates the existence of a common access to the mental number line
Can Implicit or Explicit Time Processing Impact Numerical Representation? Evidence From a Dual Task Paradigm
Get PDFWhether the human brain processes various types of magnitude, such as numbers and time, through a shared representation or whether there are different representations for each type of magnitude is still debated. Here, we investigated two aspects of number-time interaction: the effects of implicit and explicit processing of time on numbers and the bi-directional interaction between time and number processing. Thirty-two participants were randomly assigned into two experimental groups that performed, respectively, a Single task (number comparison, with implicit time processing) and a Dual task (number comparison as a primary task, with explicit time processing as a secondary task). Results showed that participants, only in the Dual task, were faster and more accurate when processing large numbers paired with long rather than short durations, whereas the opposite pattern was not evident for small numbers. Moreover, participants were more accurate when judging long durations after having processed large rather than small numbers, whereas the opposite pattern emerged for short durations. We propose that number processing influences time processing more than vice versa, suggesting that numbers and time might be at least partially independently represented. This finding can pave the way for investigating the hierarchical representation of space, numbers, and time
Numbers around Descartes: A preregistered study on the three-dimensional SNARC effect
No full textThe Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect suggests that numbers are represented along a horizontal left-to-right oriented, mental number line, with small numbers on the left and large numbers on the right. Much less evidence exists for vertical (down-to-up) and sagittal (near-to-far) SNARC effects. This might be due to the employment of different experimental paradigms among studies and to the, sometimes, inexact definition of the vertical and sagittal axes. We investigated for the first time the SNARC effect along the horizontal, vertical, and sagittal axes, by means of a classic SNARC task. Our results suggest the presence of three equally-strong SNARC effects. Our findings can be considered as evidence in favor of a three-dimensional, mental representation of numbers, in the form of a mental number space, defined by Cartesian coordinates
How to differentiate hemianesthesia from left tactile neglect: A preliminary case report
No full textAphasia and Math: Deficits with Basic Number Comprehension and in Numerical Activities of Daily Living
Get PDFObjective: In the present study, we explored numerical problems in individuals with aphasia. We investigate whether numerical deficits, usually accompanying aphasia, can be observed on number comprehension tasks that do not necessarily require an oral response. Method: Individuals with aphasia were classified into anterior, posterior, and global subgroups according to the lesion type. To investigate numerical cognition, we used a relatively recent tool, the Numerical Activities of Daily Living (NADL). Results: The results showed that individuals with aphasia have problems with tasks of basic number comprehension as well as in most NADL. In the formal part of the NADL, anterior aphasic patients made comparatively more errors than the posterior aphasic patients. Global aphasic patients presented an invariably poor performance on almost all tasks. Conclusion: The results provide insight into how numerical deficits may impair an individual with aphasia in activities of daily living. This study is a preliminary attempt to start the validation process of the NADL for the Greek population
Numerical magnitude, rather than individual bias, explains spatial numerical association in newborn chicks
Get PDFWe associate small numbers with the left and large numbers with the right side of space. Recent evidence from human newborns and non-human animals has challenged the primary role assigned to culture, in determining this spatial numerical association (SNA). Nevertheless, the effect of individual spatial biases has not been considered in previous research. Here, we tested the effect of numerical magnitude in SNA and we controlled for itablendividual biases. We trained 3-day-old chicks (Gallus gallus) on a given numerical magnitude (5). Then chicks could choose between two identical, left or right, stimuli both representing either 2, 8, or 5 elements. We computed the percentage of Left-sided Choice (LC). Numerical magnitude, but not individual lateral bias, explained LC: LC2 vs. 2>LC5 vs. 5>LC8 vs. 8. These findings suggest that SNA originates from pre-linguistic precursors, and pave the way to the investigation of the neural correlates of the number space association
- …
