130,439 research outputs found
A new species of Perinereis Kinberg, 1865 (Annelida: Nereididae) and invalidation of two congeners from Western India
No full textPrajapat, Vaishali, Villalobos-Guerrero, Tulio F., Vachhrajani, Kauresh D. (2023): A new species of Perinereis Kinberg, 1865 (Annelida: Nereididae) and invalidation of two congeners from Western India. Zootaxa 5330 (3): 398-412, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5330.3.4, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5330.3.
Perinereis khambhatiensis Prajapat, Villalobos-Guerrero & Vachhrajani 2023, sp. n.
No full text<i>Perinereis khambhatiensis</i> Prajapat, Villalobos-Guerrero & Vachhrajani, sp. n. <p>Figure 3A–N urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: 2ABEA8CC-094A-4895-ACD1-39A78B455184</p> <p> <b>Type material</b>. <b>India, Gulf of Khambhat.</b> Holotype: MSUB-ZL-AN-PCh-01, Kamboi (22°12’55.67’’N, 72°36’25.42’’E), Gujarat, 04 March 2022, hard mud substratum, coll. V. Prajapat & K. Vachhrajani. Paratypes: Five specimens(ZSI-WRCANN/25), Kamboi (22°13’1.10’’N,72°36’57.17’’E), Nahar (22°11’33.21’’N, 72°41’23.75’’E), Gujarat, 27 April 2022, hard mud substratum, coll. V. Prajapat & K. Vachhrajani.</p> <p> <b>Additional material.</b> <b>India, Gulf of Khambhat.</b> Twenty specimens (MSUB-ZL-AN-PCh-03), Kamboi (22°12’53.61’’N, 72°36’14.63’’E), Gujarat, 12 June 2022, hard mud substratum, coll. V. Prajapat.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> Species of subgroup 2A belonging to ‘ <i>P. aibuhitensis</i> ’ species group. Specimens with broad-petite and smooth bars on area VI; areas VI-V-VI ridge pattern λ-shaped; area III with laterally isolated paragnaths; areas VII–VIII with anterior band consisting of one row; distal dorsal ligule anteriorly conical, subequal in size throughout; falcigers with camerated shaft divided into two partitions; postero-dorsal tentacular cirri extending to chaetiger 4–6.</p> <p> <b>Description of holotype (MSUB-ZL-AN-PCh-01).</b> Atoke, complete, in good condition, 52 (40–76) mm TL, 5.8 (3−6) mm L10, 1 (1.5−2) mm W10, and 98 (80−91) chaetigers. Overall body color brownish (Figure 3A), chaetigers mid-dorsally greenish, laterally creamy white, ventrally creamy or white (anterior region with irregular black spots in one specimen).</p> <p>Prostomium campanulate (Figure 3B); anterior region distally entire, sub-quadrangular, slightly longer than posterior region; anterolateral gap between antenna and palpophore narrow, as wide as basal diameter of antennae.</p> <p>Palpophores sub-conical, thick, slightly longer than wide, as long as prostomium(Figure3B);sub-distal transverse groove distinct, deeply embedded. Palpostyles oval in paratypes, one-half as wide as diameter of palpophore.</p> <p>Antennae tapered, conical, short, as long as prostomial posterior region; antennae separated by gap as wide as basal diameter of antennae.</p> <p>Paired eyes in rectangular arrangement, purplish (Figure 3B); gap between both pairs three-quarters as wide as diameter of posterior pair of eyes. Anterior pair of eyes oval, with eye diameter slightly wider than that of antennae, with gap between eyes 3.5 times as wide as eye diameter; lenses visible, whitish, oval, placed anterolaterally, covering 40% of eye. Posterior pair of eyes oval, with diameter as wide as that of antennae, not covered by tentacular belt; lenses visible, purplish, oval, placed centrally, covering 60% of eye.</p> <p>Tentacular belt 1.3 times as long as chaetiger 1 (Figure 3B), with straight anterior margin; dorsum without transverse wrinkle.</p> <p>Tentacular cirri smooth (Figure 3B). Antero-dorsal cirri extending posteriorly to chaetiger 1 (1–2). Antero-ventral cirri as long as palpophore, slightly thicker than and as long as postero-ventral cirri. Postero-dorsal cirri longest, extending posteriorly to chaetiger 4 (4−6). Postero-ventral cirri slenderest, extended over first quarter of prostomial posterior region. Dorsal cirrophores of tentacular cirri cylindrical; postero-dorsal cirrophores as long as wide, subequal to antero-dorsal cirrophores. Ventral cirrophores ring-shaped; postero-ventral cirrophores shortest and narrowest, three-quarters as wide as antero-ventral cirrophores.</p> <p>Proboscis everted (Figure 3B–D), with maxillary and oral rings cylindrical, wider than long. Jaws denticulate, dark brown amber, 6 (5−7) short, with blunt tips (Figure 3E, F); inner margin of fang nearly straight; 2 canals emerging from pulp cavity (Figure 3E, F). Paragnaths present on both maxillary and oral rings of proboscis, all brown (Figure 3B–D); consisting of uniform-base cones, except broad-petite bars on area VI; paragnaths on maxillary ring shorter than those on oral ring; plate-like basements absent. Area I: 4 (1−3), small (longitudinal row when 2, triangular patch when 3) (Figure 3B). Areas IIa: 18 (12−19), IIb: 19 (14−18), three irregular rows of uneven cones in ovoid transverse patch, medial cones slightly larger (Figure 3B). Area III: 25 (22−34), four irregular transverse rows of uneven cones in oval patch, distal cones larger, with distinct isolated lateral groups of 3 and 5 (2−4) paragnaths (Figure 3C, D). Areas IVa: 32 (24−35), IVb: 33 (26−35), 6−7 irregular rows of uneven cones in triangular patch (Figure 3C, D), distal cones larger; without merged paragnaths.Area V: 3, triangular patch of coarse cones of similar size, two proximal cones in transverse row and single distal cone on same level as distal-most paragnath on area VI (Figure 3B). Areas VIa: 2 and VIb: 2, one oblique row of uneven, coarse bars with round tip, well separated from each other, inner as smooth bar, bigger than outer broad-petite bar (Figure 3B). Areas VII–VIII: 37 (28–31), paragnaths in two well-separated bands of similar-sized cones, with anterior band consisting of one furrow row (one paragnath on each region), and posterior band with two transverse rows displaced from each other (furrow row proximal with one cone on each region, ridge row distal with 1–3 cones on each region). Ridges of areas VI-V-VI with λ-shaped pattern (Figure 3B). Gap between area VI and areas VII–VIII broad, as wide as half of palpophore width. Paired oesophageal caeca present (Figure 3G).</p> <p>Notopodia consisting of dorsal cirrus, dorsal ligule (distal and proximal regions), and median ligule in biramous parapodia; notopodial prechaetal lobe or notoacicular process not developed throughout.</p> <p>Dorsal cirrus conical, thick, short (Figure 3H–L), longer than proximal region of dorsal ligule and extending up to three-quarters of distal region of dorsal ligule in anterior and middle chaetigers (Figure 3H–J), as long as proximal and distal regions of dorsal ligule in following chaetigers (Figure 3K, L); attached to one-third of dorsal ligule in anterior chaetigers, medially in following chaetigers.</p> <p>Dorsal ligule with distal region as long as proximal region in anterior and middle chaetigers (Figure 3H–L), becoming shorter than that in following chaetigers (Figure 3K, L). Proximal region of dorsal ligule compressed in most chaetigers (Figure 3H–K), except distended and sub-oval in most-posterior chaetigers (Figure 3L); 2 prominent ovoid patches of dark brown glands present from posterior chaetigers, covering three-quarters of ligule area. Distal region of dorsal ligule becoming gradually shorter and slightly narrower towards posterior end; bluntly conical in most anterior and most posterior chaetigers (Figure 3H, L), conical with pointed tip in remaining chaetigers (Figure 3I–K); slightly shorter than median ligule in anterior and middle chaetigers, slightly longer than that in following chaetigers; projecting distinctly beyond notoacicula throughout; without glandular patches throughout.</p> <p>Median ligule similar-sized throughout; bluntly conical in anterior chaetigers, conical and becoming slightly shorter and narrower in following parapodia.</p> <p>Neuropodia consisting of neuroacicular ligule with superior and inferior lobes, ventral ligule, and ventral cirrus; neuropodial postchaetal lobe reduced throughout.</p> <p>Neuroacicular ligule sub-rectangular throughout; longer than ventral ligule in anterior and middle chaetigers (Figure 3H–J), as long as that in following chaetigers (Figure 3K, L); neuroacicular ligule 1.5 times as wide as ventral ligule in anterior and middle parapodia, twice as wide as that in following chaetigers.</p> <p>Superior lobe rounded (Figure 3H–J), subequal to inferior lobe throughout.</p> <p>Inferior lobe rounded, slightly longer than neuroacicular ligule throughout (Figure 3H–K), becoming shorter in posterior chaetigers (Figure 3L).</p> <p>Ventral ligule well developed throughout; digitiform, thick, as long as (or slightly shorter than) median ligule in anteriormost chaetigers, bluntly conical, one-half to one-third as long as median ligule in following chaetigers (Figure 3I–L).</p> <p>Ventral cirri conical, slender; three-quarters to two-thirds as long as ventral ligule in anteriormost and anterior chaetigers (Figure 3H, I), half as long as that in following chaetigers (Figure 3J–L).</p> <p>Aciculae mostly dark brown throughout. Notoaciculae absent in first 2 chaetigers (Figure 3H). Notoaciculae markedly shorter than neuroaciculae in anterior and middle chaetigers (Figure 3H–J), subequal to those in following chaetigers (Figure 3K, L). Neuroaciculae as long as median ligule in anteriormost and anterior chaetigers, shorter than median ligule in following chaetigers.</p> <p>Notochaetae all homogomph spinigers throughout; 7–8 spinigers present in anterior chaetigers, 5–6 in middle chaetigers, and 4–5 in posterior chaetigers.</p> <p>Upper neurochaetae consisting of homogomph spinigers and heterogomph falcigers throughout; 3–4 spinigers present in anteriormost, anterior and middle chaetigers, 4–5 spinigers in following chaetigers; 3–4 falcigers present in anteriormost and anterior chaetigers, 5–7 falcigers in following chaetigers.</p> <p>Lower neurochaetae consisting of heterogomph spinigers and heterogomph falcigers throughout; 1–2 spinigers present in anteriormost chaetigers, 3–4 spinigers in anterior chaetigers, 1–2 spinigers in following chaetigers; 6–7 falcigers present in anteriormost and anterior chaetigers, 5–6 falcigers in middle chaetigers and 6–7 falcigers in following chaetigers.</p> <p>Blade of both homogomph and heterogomph spinigers long, finely serrated, with teeth evenly spaced (Figure 3M). Blade of heterogomph falcigers long, slender, straight, partially serrated (Figure 3N). Shaft of falcigers camerated, with cavity divided sub-distally into two distinct longitudinal partitions (Figure 3N).</p> <p>Pygidium with long anal cirri, as long as last 4 (3–7) chaetigers.</p> <p> <b>Variation.</b> Total body length: 39–96 mm. Length to chaetiger 10: 3–6 mm. Body width at chaetiger 10: 1–2 mm. Number of total chaetigers: 76–102. Longest tentacular cirri extending to chaetiger 3–6. Jaws with 9–11 denticles. Number and pattern of paragnaths: area I: 1–5, mostly 1 to 3 and rarely 4–5, two in line, three in triangle, four in rhomboid, or five in circle; area II: 11–24; area III: 22–34 in central patch, 2–4 cones isolated laterally; area IV: 24–42; area V: 1–4, three in most of the specimens and rarely 1, 2 or 4; area VII–VIII: 28–37. Anal cirri as long as last 3–7 chaetigers.</p> <p> <b>Habitat.</b> Tube dwelling species burrowing in calcrete mud flats. Burrows are found abundantly in the substratum from surface to about 15 cm depth, and are separated from each other by thin muddy walls.</p> <p>We observed several macrobenthic organisms (amphipods, isopods, brachyurans, burrowing sea anemones, rove beetles and other small fauna) in the hard substratum present studies (unpublished data).</p> <p> <b>Type locality</b>. Kamboi (22°12’55.67’’N, 72°36’25.42’’E), Gulf of Khambhat, Gujarat, India.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Only known from Kamboi and Nahar in the Gulf of Khambhat, Gujarat, northwestern India.</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> The specific epithet makes reference to the Gulf of Khambhat, derived from the region where the type locality is located and all the specimens were collected.</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> <i>Perinereis khambhatiensis</i> <b>sp. n.</b> is a member of the ‘ <i>P. aibuhitensis</i> ’ species group following the definition given by Villalobos-Guerrero <i>et al</i>. (2021b). Out of nineteen <i>Perinereis</i> species recorded from India, only three species have been regarded as belonging to ‘ <i>P. aibuhitensis</i> ’ species group: <i>Perinereis aibuhitensis</i>, <i>P. singaporiensis</i> and <i>P. vancaurica</i> (Fauvel 1932; Bhatt & Bal 1966; Parulekar 1972; Sivadas & Carvalho 2020).</p> <p> Based on the presence of isolated conical paragnaths on area III, <i>P. khambhatiensis</i> <b>sp. n.</b> is morphologically similar to <i>P. aibuhitensis</i> and <i>P. singaporiensis</i>, both described from far and distinct biogeographic realms (Eastern and Central Indo-Pacific, respectively, according to Spalding <i>et al.</i> 2007), but reported in Indian waters. However, <i>P. khambhatiensis</i> <b>sp. n.</b> differs from them by the conical shape of the distal region of dorsal ligules in anterior chaetigers (bluntly conical in <i>P. aibuhitensis</i>, bluntly rounded in <i>P. singaporiensis</i>). In addition, <i>P. khambhatiensis</i> <b>sp. n.</b> differs from <i>P. aibuhitensis</i> by the ridge pattern of areas VI-V-VI, the range number of paragnaths present on area IV, and length of the bar-shaped paragnaths on area VI. In <i>P. khambhatiensis</i> <b>sp. n.</b>, the ridge pattern of areas VI-V-VI is λ-shaped, contrary to that π-shaped present in <i>P. aibuhitensis</i>. In <i>P. khambhatiensis</i> <b>sp. n.</b>, area IV has 24−42 paragnaths, in contrast to 8−23 present in <i>P. aibuhitensis</i>. In <i>P. khambhatiensis</i> <b>sp. n.</b>, the inner bar of area VI is longer than the outer one, contrary to those of similar size in <i>P. aibuhitensis</i>.</p> <p> <i>P. khambhatiensis</i> <b>sp. n.</b> can be distinguished from <i>P. singaporiensis</i> by the pattern of paragnaths on areas VII– VIII, number of teeth in jaws, and number of paragnaths on areas II, V, and VII–VIII. <i>Perinereis khambhatiensis</i> <b>sp. n.</b> is also different from <i>P. singaporiensis</i> by having the anterior band of areas VII–VIII with one transverse row present on furrows, in contrast to two rows (furrows and ridges) in the latter species. In <i>P. khambhatiensis</i> <b>sp. n.</b>, area II has 11–24 paragnaths, area V has typically three paragnaths, and areas VII–VIII have 28–37 paragnaths, whereas in <i>P. singaporiensis</i> area II has 9–10 paragnaths, area V has a single paragnath, and areas VII–VIII have 34–48 paragnaths. In <i>P. khambhatiensis</i> <b>sp. n.</b>, the jaws have 9–11 denticles, contrary to 6–7 in <i>P. singaporiensis</i>.</p> <p> <i>P. khambhatiensis</i> <b>sp. n.</b> differs from <i>P. vancaurica</i> by several features. In <i>P. khambhatiensis</i> <b>sp. n.</b>, the ridge pattern of areas VI–V–VI is λ-shaped, contrary to π-shaped in <i>P. vancaurica</i>. In <i>P. khambhatiensis</i> <b>sp. n.</b>, the anterior band of areas VII–VIII has one transverse row present on furrows, in contrast to two rows (furrows and ridges) in <i>P. vancaurica</i>. In <i>P. khambhatiensis</i>, area III has laterally isolated paragnaths, in contrast to their absence in <i>P. vancaurica.</i> In <i>P. khambhatiensis</i> <b>sp. n.</b>, the number of paragnaths on areas III (22–34), IV (24–42) and VII–VIII (28–37) is fewer than in <i>P. vancaurica</i> (areas III: 32–84; IV: 40–88; VII–VIII: 58–129).</p> <p> Bhatt & Bal (1966) described two varieties of <i>Perinereis</i> from India (both from Bombay): <i>P. vancaurica</i> var. <i>indica</i> and <i>P. nuntia</i> var. <i>bombayensis</i>. However, several taxonomic characters were not mentioned and properly defined for the specimens, and these taxa are not valid according to the article 45.6.3 (ICZN 1999), which states that varieties described after 1960 are considered of an infrasubspecific rank. Therefore, these are not available names and they are herein considered invalid. The records likely represent species similar to the complexes <i>P. vancaurica</i> and <i>P. nuntia</i>; however, this requires reexamination of Bhatt & Bal’s (1966) material, or newly collected specimens from the region, since they are known only by the pharyngeal arrangement.</p>Published as part of <i>Prajapat, Vaishali, Villalobos-Guerrero, Tulio F. & Vachhrajani, Kauresh D., 2023, A new species of Perinereis Kinberg, 1865 (Annelida: Nereididae) and invalidation of two congeners from Western India, pp. 398-412 in Zootaxa 5330 (3)</i> on pages 402-406, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5330.3.4, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8254837">http://zenodo.org/record/8254837</a>
Perinereis Kinberg 1865
No full text<i>Perinereis</i> Kinberg, 1865 <p> <b>Type species.</b> <i>Perinereis novaehollandiae</i> Kinberg, 1865, by subsequent designation (<i>fide</i> Hartman, 1949). Currently regarded as a junior synonym of <i>P. amblyodonta</i> Schmarda, 1861 (Ehlers, 1904; Hartman, 1959).</p>Published as part of <i>Prajapat, Vaishali, Villalobos-Guerrero, Tulio F. & Vachhrajani, Kauresh D., 2023, A new species of Perinereis Kinberg, 1865 (Annelida: Nereididae) and invalidation of two congeners from Western India, pp. 398-412 in Zootaxa 5330 (3)</i> on page 401, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5330.3.4, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8254837">http://zenodo.org/record/8254837</a>
MeSH term explosion and author rank improve expert recommendations
No full textInformation overload is an often-cited phenomenon that reduces the productivity, efficiency and efficacy of scientists. One challenge for scientists is to find appropriate collaborators in their research. The literature describes various solutions to the problem of expertise location, but most current approaches do not appear to be very suitable for expert recommendations in biomedical research. In this study, we present the development and initial evaluation of a vector space model-based algorithm to calculate researcher similarity using four inputs: 1) MeSH terms of publications; 2) MeSH terms and author rank; 3) exploded MeSH terms; and 4) exploded MeSH terms and author rank. We developed and evaluated the algorithm using a data set of 17,525 authors and their 22,542 papers. On average, our algorithms correctly predicted 2.5 of the top 5/10 coauthors of individual scientists. Exploded MeSH and author rank outperformed all other algorithms in accuracy, followed closely by MeSH and author rank. Our results show that the accuracy of MeSH term-based matching can be enhanced with other metadata such as author rank
FIGURE 3 in A new species of Perinereis Kinberg, 1865 (Annelida: Nereididae) and invalidation of two congeners from Western India
No full textFIGURE 3. Perinereis khambhatiensis sp. nov. from Kamboi, Gujarat, India. A, H–N, atoke holotype (MSUB-ZL-AN-PCh- 01); B–G, atoke paratype (ZSI-WRC ANN/25). A. Whole body in dorsolateral view. B. Anterior region and everted proboscis in dorsal view. C. Everted proboscis in ventral view. D. Paragnaths of areas III and IV, arrows pointing at lateral isolated paragnaths on area III. E. Left jaw in ventral view and right jaw in dorsal view, respectively. F. Close-up of jaw in ventral view, arrow pointing inner canals. G. Paired oesophageal caeca (arrows) in ventral view. H–L. Parapodia in anterior view, numbers refer to the chaetiger. M. Homogomph spiniger from notopodia (chaetiger 45). N. Heterogomph falciger from neuropodial subacicular fascicle (chaetiger 48). Scale bars: A, 7 mm; B, 0.8 mm; C, E, 0.4 mm; D, 0.5 mm; F, 0.2 mm; G, 1 mm; H–L, 200 μm; M, 40 μm; N, 25 μm.Published as part of <i>Prajapat, Vaishali, Villalobos-Guerrero, Tulio F. & Vachhrajani, Kauresh D., 2023, A new species of Perinereis Kinberg, 1865 (Annelida: Nereididae) and invalidation of two congeners from Western India, pp. 398-412 in Zootaxa 5330 (3)</i> on page 403, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5330.3.4, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8254837">http://zenodo.org/record/8254837</a>
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
"Closing the R&D Gap, Evaluating the Sources of R&D Spending"
No full textBoth spending and tax policies have been implemented in the United States with the goal of stimulating private sector research and development (R&D). Karier questions whether current R&D policy, especially the research and experimentation tax credit, can contribute to closing the gap between nondefense expenditures on R&D in the United States and such expenditures in other countries, such as Japan and Germany. He also explores possible changes to our current R&D policy to make it more effective.
Reentrant phenomenon in the diffuse ferroelectric BaSn0.15Ti0.85 O3: Local structural insights and first-order reversal curves study
No full textFrom the phase diagram proposed by Lei et al. [J. Appl. Phys. 101, 084105 (2007)JAPIAU0021-897910.1063/1.2715522], BaSn0.15Ti0.85O3 is chosen. It also exhibits a diffuse phase transition between cubic and rhombohedral (C-R) near room temperature. Dielectric analysis confirms a phase transition near room temperature (TC≈290 K). In addition, frequency dispersion in the dielectric constant, concomitantly, a loss peak is observed at low temperatures (
Perinereis aibuhitensis
No full text‘ Perinereis aibuhitensis ’ species group Perinereis subgroup 2A: Hutchings et al., 1991: 271–273 (partim). ‘ Perinereis aibuhitensis ’ species group: Villalobos-Guerrero et al. 2021: 284–285. Remarks. ‘ Perinereis aibuhitensis ’ species group was proposed by Villalobos-Guerrero et al. (2021b) and, with the new species described herein, consists of 12 species: Perinereis aibuhitensis (Grube, 1878), P. babuzai (Hsueh, 2019), P. belawanensis (Pflugfelder, 1933), P. brevicirrata (Treadwell, 1920), P. khambhatiensis n. sp., P.kinmenensis (Hsueh, 2019), P. linea (Treadwell, 1936), P. rookery de León-González & Goethel, 2013, P. shigungensis (Hsueh, 2019), P. singaporiensis (Grube, 1878), P. vancaurica (Ehlers, 1868), and P. vitabunda (Pflugfelder, 1933). These species are featured by having area VI with two bar-shaped (mostly broad-petite bars, sometimes smooth-bars) paragnaths, dorsal ligules not greatly expanded in posterior parapodia, dorsal cirri short, and heterogomph falcigers with blade straight and consisting of a markedly elongated incurved tooth. Villalobos-Guerrero et al. (2021b) also provided an identification key to species within the Group 2. The key is modified here to restrict it only to those species belonging to the ‘ aibuhitensis ’ group and updated to include the newly described species. Perinereis brevicirrata from Santos (Brazil) is excluded from the key because its morphology is incompletely known and poorly illustrated.Published as part of Prajapat, Vaishali, Villalobos-Guerrero, Tulio F. & Vachhrajani, Kauresh D., 2023, A new species of Perinereis Kinberg, 1865 (Annelida: Nereididae) and invalidation of two congeners from Western India, pp. 398-412 in Zootaxa 5330 (3) on page 401, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5330.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/825483
- …
