265,993 research outputs found
Posner, Economics and the Law: from Law and Economics to an Economic Analysis of Law.
No full textThe purpose of this article is to discuss Posner's economic analysis of law and to analyse the differences between his economic analysis of law and law and economics. We propose and demonstrate a twofold original argument. First, we show that Posner does not only propose an economic analysis of the working of the legal system but also that his approach has changed in the early 1970s, shifting from a law and economics perspective in which the focus is put on the working of the economic system to an economic analysis of law in which the emphasis is put on the functioning of the legal system. He appears then no longer influenced by Aaron Director and Ronald Coase but rather by Gary Becker. Therefore, and this is the second part of our demonstration, we show that the evolution in Posner's works essentially derives from the influence of Becker and the adoption by the former of the methodological views of the latter. More precisely, we claim that Posner no longer retains a -- restrictive -- definition of economics by subject matter but that he aligns himself on Becker and his broader definition of economics placing nonmarket decisions and method at the core of the discipline. In other words, we argue that Posner is the first who transposes Becker’s definition of economics in law and economics and that this is precisely what makes Posner's economic analysis of law possible and specific, and also of particular importance.
Programma Quo Consensus Ac Dissensus Scholae Aristotelicae Et Cartesianae In Philosophia Naturali explicationem Lectionis publicis instituendam intimat Caspar Posner, Prof. Publ. : [Dab. Ienae V. Iuli[i] anni Chr. MDCXCVI.]
No full textPROGRAMMA QUO CONSENSUS AC DISSENSUS SCHOLAE ARISTOTELICAE ET CARTESIANAE IN PHILOSOPHIA NATURALI EXPLICATIONEM LECTIONIS PUBLICIS INSTITUENDAM INTIMAT CASPAR POSNER, PROF. PUBL. : [DAB. IENAE V. IULI[I] ANNI CHR. MDCXCVI.]
Programma Quo Consensus Ac Dissensus Scholae Aristotelicae Et Cartesianae In Philosophia Naturali explicationem Lectionis publicis instituendam intimat Caspar Posner, Prof. Publ. : [Dab. Ienae V. Iuli[i] anni Chr. MDCXCVI.] (1)
Titelblatt (1)
Text (3
Heinemann (I.). — Die griechische Weltanschauungslehre bei Juden und Römern. 1932
No full textPosner A. Heinemann (I.). — Die griechische Weltanschauungslehre bei Juden und Römern. 1932. In: Revue des études juives, tome 95, n°189, juillet-septembre 1933. pp. 111-112
Szlovákia (közigazgatási térkép) (1880)
No full textTelepülések nagyság szerint jelölve névvelDomborzat csíkozással, névírássalUtak minőség szerintFokhálózat a kereten bejelölveJárások határaikkal, külön magyarázatbanJelmagyarázathbkhivatalos adatok alapján rajzolta Hátsek Ignác
Posner\u27s Pragmatist Jurisprudence
No full textI. Introduction
II. Overview: A Sketch of the Main Themes and Three Points of View of Posner\u27s Pragmatism
III. Jurisprudence without Foundations?—The Jurisprudential Methodology of Posner\u27s Pragmatism
IV. The Meta-ethical Posture of Posner\u27s Pragmatism ... A. Thicker Epistemology ... B. Intuitionism and Objectivity ... 1. Intuition-Bedrock, Tacit Knowing, and the Faculty of Induction ... 2. The Redescription of Science for Lawyers ... 3. The Test of Time and Truth ... C. The Force of Rhetoric—Literature, the Test of Time, and Omnisignificance ... D. Posner\u27s Meta-ethical Relativism ... 1. Posner\u27s Approach Is Largely Relativist ... 2. Posner\u27s Pragmatism Is Not Clearly Empirical nor Dualist: Non-cognitivism, Neo-intuitionism, Anti-theory?
V. Posner\u27s Pragmatism Implies a Normative Program ... A. The Argument for a Pragmatic Normative Program in The Problems of Jurisprudence ... 1. Simple Instrumentalism ... 2. In Praise of Wealth Maximization ... 3. The Defense of Wealth Maximization ... a. Defense of the Positive Theory ... b. Criticisms of the Normative Implications of the Economic Analysis of Law—The Defense … c. Promoting the Economic Analysis of Law ... B. Cardozo—The Argument for Wealth Maximization … C. Overcoming Law—Pragmatism, Liberalism, and Law and Economics
VI. Conclusio
A Reply to Posner
No full textIn The First Amendment\u27s Purpose, I criticized the cost-benefit approach to free speech, of which Richard Posner has been a leading advocate. On the cost-benefit view (or at least Posner\u27s view of that view), speech can be prohibited when in American society its harmful consequences are thought to outweigh its expressive value. Or, in another formulation: [S]peech should be allowed if but only if its benefits equal or exceed its costs
Posner on Literature
No full textJudge Richard A. Posner has expanded the scope of his writing. We have previously known him as one of the leaders in law and economics. He is now moving into the field of law and literature. His offering is an article, Law and Literature: A Relation Reargued, which has been published in the Virginia Law Review.
As one might expect, he performs intelligently. Posner is well read in literature; he displays a genuine love for that which he has read; and he writes with wit and grace. In short, in law and literature, as in law and economics, Posner is a force to be reckoned with. The evidence for these assertions can be found in the article: his comments on W.B. Yeats\u27 poems Easter 1916 (pp. 1363-64, 1366) and The Second Coming (pp. 1378-79) demonstrate his skill as a reader of poetry; his literary analysis of Justice Holmes\u27 dissent in the Lochner case (pp. 1379-85, 1389-90) shows that he can apply these literary skills to a reading of judicial opinions.
However, I must utter a however. As I read Posner (and I would recommend others read him) he builds his analysis on the base of several dichotomies that seem to be drawn from ordinary common sense. One of the dichotomies is the distinction of pleasure versus instruction. Another is form (or style) versus content. Yet another is science versus rhetoric. These several dichotomies are linked into a logic that provides the structural underpinning for Posner\u27s analysis; my caveat is that the logic of these dichotomies limits rather than strengthens his analysis. This is my conclusion, so let me now start at the beginning
Magyarország (közigazgatási térkép) (1880)
No full textFokhálózat a kereten bejelölveJárások határaikkal, számmal, külön magyarázatbanJelmagyarázatTelepülések nagyság szerinti jellel és névvelUtak, vasutak feltüntetveMegj.: Hátsek I.: A magyar szent korona országainak megyei térképei c. atlaszábanhivatalos adatok alapján rajzolta Hátsek IgnáczA DEENK Díszműszint T 51 helyrajzi számú példányának digitális másolatakőnyomat, színe
- …
