1,720,982 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Switch from rasagiline to safinamide in fluctuating Parkinson’s disease patients. a retrospective, pilot study
No full textBesides the inhibition of monoamine-oxidase-B, high-dose safinamide (100 mg) also blocks voltage-gated Na+ and Ca++ channels and inhibits glutamate release at overactive synapses. This latter mechanism may provide further benefit to fluctuating Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients compared to rasagiline. Here, we retrospectively investigated the consequences of shifting from rasagiline to high-dose safinamide in PD patients reporting symptoms of wearing-off, defined by the Wearing-Off-Questionnaire-19 (WOQ-19) score ≥3 at baseline. Seventeen PD patients were switched from rasagiline 1 mg to safinamide 100 mg because of the report of symptoms of fluctuations while under therapy with either levodopa+rasagiline or levodopa+rasagiline+dopamine agonists, or re-occurrence of fluctuations previously corrected by add-on with rasagiline. Patients were re-evaluated 4–6 months after switch. Switch to safinamide 100 mg produced benefit in 9/17 (52.9%) subjects, together with significant reduction of subjective symptoms of wearing-off. There was no report of adverse events. Findings from this retrospective, exploratory study suggest that safinamide 100 mg may produce more powerful benefit that rasagiline 1 mg as add-on to levodopa in fluctuating PD patients, possibly because of the bimodal mechanism of action of the former drug
The role of opicapone in the management of Parkinson's disease: an Italian consensus through a combined Nominal Group Technique and Delphi approach
Get PDFObjective: Opicapone (OPC) is a third-generation peripheral catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitor (COMT-i) approved as add-on therapy to levodopa/DOPA decarboxylase inhibitors (DDCI) combinations in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. While the OPC effectiveness on motor symptoms is well known, there is still uncertainty about the timing of introduction, the management of levodopa dose, and the efficacy on non-motor symptoms (NMS). Subjects and methods: A group of PD experts participated in a consensus activity composed of the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and the Delphi method to better define the role of OPC. A list of statements was defined with the NGT and voted on through an online Delphi process by a panel of 85 Italian clinicians. Results: 24 statements were selected for the Delphi voting. Most statements (n=15, 62%) reached a consensus. A wide agreement was reached about the efficacy of OPC in treating motor fluctuations, including early morning akinesia and nocturnal akinesia. The panel widely agreed about the effectiveness of OPC in early fluctuating patients. The long-lasting inhibitory effect of OPC was recognized as an advantage over other COMT-i, resulting in a single daily dose and greater ease of introduction into the levodopa therapeutic regimen. Conclusions: The efficacy of OPC observed in the clinical trials for the management of PD patients with motor fluctuations is also experienced in clinical practice. The review of the current positioning of OPC from the late to early stages of the disease may represent an important step in the evolution of the PD therapeutic approach
The role of opicapone in the management of Parkinson’s disease: an Italian consensus through a combined Nominal Group Technique and Delphi approach
No full text– OBJECTIVE: Opicapone (OPC) is a third-generation peripheral catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitor (COMT-i) approved as add-on therapy to levodopa/DOPA decarboxylase inhibitors (DDCI) combinations in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. While the OPC effectiveness on motor symptoms is well known, there is still uncertainty about the timing of introduction, the management of levodopa dose, and the efficacy on non-motor symptoms (NMS). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A group of PD experts participated in a consensus activity composed of the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and the Delphi method to better define the role of OPC. A list of statements was defined with the NGT and voted on through an online Delphi process by a panel of 85 Italian clinicians. RESULTS: 24 statements were selected for the Delphi voting. Most statements (n=15, 62%) reached a consensus. A wide agreement was reached about the efficacy of OPC in treating motor fluctuations, including early morning akinesia and nocturnal akinesia. The panel widely agreed about the effectiveness of OPC in early fluctuating patients. The long-lasting inhibitory effect of OPC was recognized as an advantage over other COMT-i, resulting in a single daily dose and greater ease of introduction into the levodopa therapeutic regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of OPC observed in the clinical trials for the management of PD patients with motor fluctuations is also experienced in clinical practice. The review of the current positioning of OPC from the late to early stages of the disease may represent an important step in the evolution of the PD therapeutic approach
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
