1,721,213 research outputs found
Fachdidaktische Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen und subjektives Fachwissen von (angehenden) Lehrkräfte zum Unterrichten von Gesellschaftslehre: Von der Pilotierung zur Messinvarianz
Fachdidaktische Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen und subjektives Fachwissen von (angehenden) Lehrkräfte zum Unterrichten von Gesellschaftslehre: Von der Pilotierung zur Messinvarianz
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Workflow exception patterns
This paper presents a classification framework for workflow exception handling in the form of patterns. This framework is independent of specific modelling approaches or technologies and as such provides an objective means of delineating the exception-handling capabilities of specific workflow systems. It is subsequently used to assess the level of exceptions support provided by eight commercial workflow systems and business process modelling and execution languages. On the basis of these investigations, we propose a graphical, tool-independent language for defining exception handling strategies in workflows
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Rifampin followed by ceftriaxone for experimental meningitis decreases lipoteichoic acid concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid and reduces neuronal damage in comparison to ceftriaxone alone
Rifampin (RIF) releases smaller quantities of lipoteichoic acids (LTAs) from Streptococcus pneumoniae than ceftriaxone (CRO). Due to the rapid development of resistance, RIF cannot be used as a single agent for therapy of bacterial meningitis. For this reason, we compared the effect of treatment with RIF followed by treatment with CRO (RIF-CRO) or the effect of treatment with clindamycin (CLI) followed by treatment with CRO (CLI-CRO) to that of CRO alone on the concentrations of LTAs and teichoic acids in vitro. The effects of RIF-CRO on LTA concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and on neuronal injury were investigated in a rabbit model of S. pneumoniae meningitis. In vitro, bacterial titers were effectively reduced by CRO, RIF-CRO, and CLI-CRO when each drug was used at 10 mug/ml. The levels of release of LTAs after the initiation of therapy were lower in RIF-CRO- and CLI-CRO-treated cultures than in cultures treated with CRO alone (P < 0.05 from 3 to 12 h after initiation of treatment). Similarly, in rabbits, the increase in the amount of LTAs in CSF was lower in RIF-CRO-treated animals than in CRO-treated animals (P = 0.02). The density of dentate apoptotic granular cells was lower after RIF-CRO therapy than after CRO therapy (medians, 58.4 and 145.6/mm(2), respectively; 25th quartiles, 36.3 and 81.7/mm(2), respectively; 75th quartiles, 100.7 and 152.3/ mm(2), respectively; P = 0.03). Therefore, initiation of therapy with a protein synthesis-inhibiting antibacterial and continuation of therapy with a combination that includes a β-lactam may be a strategy to decrease neuronal injury in bacterial meningitis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
