1,720,970 research outputs found
Open Science training and education: challenges and difficulties on the researchers' side and in public engagement
Open Science may become the next scientific revolution, but still lingers in
a pre-paradigmatic phase, characterised by the lack of established
definitions and domains. Certainly, Open Science requires a new vision of
the way to produce and share scientific knowledge, as well as new skills.
Therefore, education plays a crucial role in supporting this cultural change
along the path of science. This is the basic principle inspiring the collection
of essays published in this issue of JCOM, which deals with many subjects
ranging from open access to the public engagement in scientific research,
from open data to the social function of preprint servers for the physicians’
community. These are issues that go along with the targets of the FOSTER
project (Facilitate Open Science Training for European Research) funded
by the European Union, which has provided interesting food for thought in
order to write this commentary
La maternità nelle comunità online. Nuove pratiche di appropriazione e nuove forme di cittadinanza tecnoscientifica
The article explores the online communities composed by pregnant women or new-mothers. A lot of online communities have been analysed in order to assess patient empowerment, but the capacity and interest in spreading, taking over and discussing health information are less investigated. Therefore the paper aims to evaluate the dynamics in spreading and use of the knowledge in digital platforms. The main goal of this study is the comprehension of the new processes of knowledge production and appropriation, with the consequent redefinition of an innovative equilibrium between experts and non-experts
La maternità nelle comunità online. Nuove pratiche di appropriazione e nuove forme di cittadinanza tecnoscientifica
The experience drivers of birthing women in the maternity hospital: a monocentric study based at Burlo Garofolo Trieste
No abstract availabl
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
“GIORNALISTA SETTORE SCIENZA. REQUISITI RICHIESTI: NESSUNA CONOSCENZA DEI TEMI DA TRATTARE”. LA COMUNICAZIONE DELLA SCIENZA DALLA “STAMPA A VAPORE” AI NEW MEDIA
- …
