1,721,330 research outputs found
Comment on “evaluation of serum interleukin-6 levels in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis”
No full textTumor necrosis factor secreted by transformed human B lymphocytes: Lack of an autocrine growth effect
No full textAntiviral treatment of hepatitis C
No full textTherapy of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may prevent progression to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and end-stage liver disease. The cornerstone of treatment has long been standard IFN-alpha, the use of which was associated with a sustained biochemical and viral response in only a small proportion of patients. More recently, the success of interferon-based regimens has substantially improved due to the combination with the guanosine analogue ribavirin and to the advent of pegylated interferon formulations. However, even the most up-to-date regimens fail to cure the infection in many cases and are limited by side effects and high costs. A better understanding of the HCV genomic organisation, the elucidation of the three-dimensional structures of virally encoded enzymes and the recent development of a HCV-replicon system in human hepatoma (Huh-7) cells have led to significant advances in the development of new antiviral compounds, many of which are under evaluation in clinical trials. The aim of this review is to trace a brief overview of the progress made by interferon-based treatments for hepatitis C since their introduction in the early 1990s, and to highlight the results of recent clinical studies concerning new and emerging drugs
MEMBRANOPROLIFERATIVE GLOMERULONEPHRITIS ASSOCIATED WITH HEPATITIS-C INFECTION WITH NO EVIDENCE OF LIVER-DISEASE
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Natural history and risk stratification of patients undergoing non-invasive ventilation in a non-ICU setting for severe COPD exacerbations
No full text- …
