1,720,991 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Optimal echo times for quantitative susceptibility mapping: A test-retest study on basal ganglia and subcortical brain nuclei

    Get PDF
    Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) is a recent MRI-technique able to quantify the bulk magnetic susceptibility of myelin, iron, and calcium in the brain. Its variability across different acquisition parameters has prompted the need for standardisation across multiple centres and MRI vendors. However, a high level of agreement between repeated imaging acquisitions is equally important. With this study we aimed to assess the inter-scan repeatability of an optimised multi-echo GRE sequence in 28 healthy volunteers. We extracted and compared the susceptibility measures from the scan and rescan acquisitions across 7 bilateral brain regions (i.e., 14 regions of interest (ROIs)) relevant for neurodegeneration. Repeatability was first assessed while reconstructing QSM with a fixed number of echo times (i.e., 8). Excellent inter-scan repeatability was found for putamen, globus pallidus and caudate nucleus, while good performance characterised the remaining structures. An increased variability was instead noted for small ROIs like red nucleus and substantia nigra. Secondly, we assessed the impact exerted on repeatability by the number of echoes used to derive QSM maps. Results were impacted by this parameter, especially in smaller regions. Larger brain structures, on the other hand, showed more consistent performance. Nevertheless, with either 8 or 7 echoes we managed to obtain good inter-scan repeatability on almost all ROIs. These findings indicate that the designed acquisition/reconstruction protocol has wide applicability, particularly in clinical or research settings involving longitudinal acquisitions (e.g. rehabilitation studies)

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore