1,720,966 research outputs found

    How «personal» is the «personal Health Record»? Technology and patient empowerment in the care of Diabetes

    Full text link
    This paper explores the role and meaning of medical information against the backdrop of new digital tools that allow for new forms of data management and sharing within the healthcare management network. The research investigates data management practices by parents of children with Type 1 diabetes as they are enabled by a Personal Health Record to become stewards of their own medical information. The underlying assumption of this and similar technologies is that they would support patient-provided collaboration and reduce the information gap between clinical encounters. Drawing on a qualitative research design, the authors analyze data management and sharing practices among patients and healthcare providers before and after the introduction of a digital logbook for diabetes management in the pediatric department of a hospital in northern Italy. The paper reveals how patients interpreted their new roles in terms of restricting access to their information, rather than facilitating its dissemination, to preserve their own competence and independent management of the information regarding their ≪PersonalGt; diseases

    Low-intensity epistemic war Medical communities and the development of legitimate knowledge in times of radical uncertainty

    No full text
    The Covid-19 pandemic offers an unprecedented opportunity to investigate knowledge-making practices and associated epistemic conflicts. In addition to the conflict between the scientific community and social groups that opposed controversial positions, we argue that the pandemic has been the backdrop of a less visible ‘epistemic war’ within the medical field, as the radical uncertainty paved the way to challenge the postulated universality of the hierarchy of evidence underlying Evidence-Based Medicine. Given this background, the study focused on the emergence of several physicians’ networks providing home treatment in the early stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Italy. Such communities of practices produced and shared knowledge and, in some cases, sought external legitimacy from the scientific community, policymakers and public opinion, thus acting as an epistemic community and coming into conflict with dominant epistemic agencies. In this ‘low-intensity epistemic war’, disputants intended to reaffirm or challenge the balance between the parties and not to annihilate the other side. By focusing on different epistemologies and practices in contemporary medicine, this study offers a more articulated and nuanced framework in which the claim of what is ‘true’ is shaped in a broader set of professional relations, ongoing scientific debates, and epistemic and political institutions

    "Look! this is the future of cardiology": institutional work and the making of telemedicine in healthcare

    Full text link
    This paper seeks to offer a critical perspective on the lack of widespread adoption of telemonitoring. The paper proposes a reconstruction of the processes that led from the first experimental adoption to the final codification of the service as a clinical service, showing the complex ecology of actors, knowledge, practices that are necessary to incardinate new services into the institutional fabric. Adopting a qualitative research design, organizational processes are investigated through the conceptual lens of 'institutional work', defined as the creative and rationally oriented activity of 'culturally competent' actors aimed at adapting to dynamic conditions through which institutions are created, reproduced and destroyed. The work aims to show how different actors, using the resources at their disposal, act to modify healthcare institutions by redefining their role in a scenario characterized by an increasing use of ICT tools in healthcare. The fieldwork confirms how the institutionalization of change requires continuous "tuning" and its transformation into everyday operational practices. At the same time, the work makes it possible to show why these processes are difficult to replicate even within the same organization, arguing that in these healthcare contexts in which institutional work is successful, particular practices prevail in connecting discursive frameworks, limited implementation strategies and economic demands

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore