1,720,961 research outputs found
Pissodes (Pissodes) pini subsp. pini pini (Linnaeus
No full textPissodes (Pissodes) pini pini (Linnaeus) Curculio pini Linnaeus, 1758 Records. ČER DNI IFR KHM KHR KYI LWI ODE RIV SUM TER VIN VOL ZAK ŽIT [Chernay 1854: 172; Nowicki 1858: 17; 1864: 36; 1865: 36; Belke 1866: 505; Lindeman 1871: 195; Nowicki 1873: 35; Łomnicki 1884: 31; 1886: 208; Cherkunov 1889: 189; Rybiński 1903b: 144; Łomnicki 1905: 73; Ksenzhopolskij 1913: 23; Shishkin 1914: 48; Penecke 1928: 362; Shapiro 1930: 142; Zagajkevich 1958: 74; Barsov et al. 1998: 150; Mazur 2002: 237; Nazarenko & Kravchenko 2002: 38; Sinjugina & Lapin 2002: 132; Nazarenko 2008b: 143; Mateleshko et al. 2009: 489; Nazarenko 2009b: 501; Timochko et al. 2009: 599; Nazarenko 2013b: 27]. Distribution. Palaearctic (excluding Asia Minor, Middle East, North Africa) (Alonso-Zarazaga 2013) Material examined. Kharkiv Prov.: 1 spec. (KUMN) 15 km S Kharkiv, Konstantovka [former Konstantinovka], Donets-Zakharzhevskij leg.; 1 spec. (KUMN) env. Kharkiv, Shkaff leg.; Kyiv Prov.: 1 spec. (SIZK) env. Kyiv; 1 spec. (SIZK) Pushcha-Voditsa, 17.v.1918; 3 spec. (SIZK) idem, 13.vi.1918; 2 spec. (SIZK) idem, glade, on young pine, V. Yu. Nazarenko leg., 10, 18.viii.2006; 2 spec. (SIZK) Borodianka Distr., near Spartak railway station, A. V. Prokhorov leg., 28.v.2001; Odesa Prov.: 1 spec. (SIZK) Valegotsulovo, Anan’jevskij ujezd, 9.vi.1921; Rivne Prov.: 2 spec. (SIZK) Klesiv Distr., 9 km NE Klesiv, Somyne Lake, Karasynske Forestry, under bark of pine stub, V. Yu. Nazarenko leg., 14.vi.2008; Sumy Prov.: 5 spec. (SIZK) Desniansko-Starohutskyi National Park, Stara Huta, q. 66, 93, V. Yu. Nazarenko leg., 21.vi.2006; Zhytomyr Prov.: 1 spec. (SIZK) Schitomir, G. Proschiga leg., 12.vi.1923; 1 spec. (SIZK) Troyany env., A. V. Prokhorov leg., 14–16.vi.2003; Zakarpatska Prov.: 1 spec. (KUMN) ca. 15 km NE Mizhhiria, Synevyrska Poliana, Kanchskyi Potik River, on Picea abies, N. Yunakov leg., 03.vii.1997. Biology. Coniferous forests. Adults occur in V–VIII. On Pinus sylvestris, P. cembra (Pinaceae) (Smreczyński 1972)Published as part of Yunakov, Nikolai, Nazarenko, Vitalij, Filimonov, Rostislav & Volovnik, Semyon, 2018, A survey of the weevils of Ukraine (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea), pp. 1-494 in Zootaxa 4404 (1) on pages 421-422, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4404.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/376675
La mission civilisatrice au Congo. Réduire des espaces de vie en prison et en enfer
No full textThe first book by Evariste (Kentey) Pini-Pini (°1955, Congo DRC) deals with the nature and the effects of the European domination in the Kongo Kingdom dating back to the end of the 15th century (“Kongo-Dyna-Nza”), the second wave of colonisation in the 19th and 20th centuries in the larger Congo territory (“Congo-prison”) and the post(neo)colonial period until the present day (“Congo-enfer”). The author gives special attention to the resistance of the Congolese people to this domination and he makes a strong plea for a “renouveau” of the “Nsi Kongo, espace de vie et de liberté”. Pini-Pini touches on a huge number of topics and evokes just as many questions about the past, present and future of the DRC Congo; about the clash and the possibility of reconciliation between the fundamental characteristics of 'the West' and 'Africa'; about the specfic role of religious actors within that relation; about the position of African immigrants in our Western/ Belgian society. The book, along with the work of a large part of the Congolese intelligentsia, does apparently not get the attention it should in Dutch-speaking Belgium. And while objections can be raised to the book, it deserves to be read and reviewed in order to stimulate the dialogue with authors such as Pini-Pini. Thus it may pave the way to the much broader dialogue, strongly asked for and desired, between ‘the West' and 'Black Africa' or, in a larger sense still, the 'Monde Noir'. Key words: Congo DRC, Kongo, colonialism, resistance, tradition, dialogue </jats:p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
