1,720,971 research outputs found
Rodin : bibliographie, 1987-1989
No full textPingeot Anne. Rodin : bibliographie, 1987-1989. In: Revue de l'Art, 1989, n°86. pp. 84-85
République tchèque
No full textPingeot Anne. République tchèque. In: Revue de l'Art, 1994, n°104. p. 86
Italie
No full textPingeot Anne, Frezzotti Stefania. Italie. In: Revue de l'Art, 1994, n°104. pp. 80-82
La sculpture du XIXe siècle. La dernière décennie
No full textPingeot Anne. La sculpture du XIXe siècle. La dernière décennie. In: Revue de l'Art, 1994, n°104. pp. 5-7
Le conte sculpté dans la seconde moitié du XIXe siècle
No full textPingeot Anne. Le conte sculpté dans la seconde moitié du XIXe siècle. In: Romantisme, 1992, n°78. Le conte et l'image. pp. 11-22
La mise en lumière des expositions. Un exemple : «Le corps en morceaux »
No full textPingeot Anne. La mise en lumière des expositions. Un exemple : «Le corps en morceaux ». In: Bulletin d'histoire de l'électricité, n°17, juin 1991. Art et électricité. pp. 45-52
Etats-Unis
No full textPingeot Anne, Butler Ruth. Etats-Unis. In: Revue de l'Art, 1994, n°104. pp. 68-69
France
No full textPingeot Anne, Chevillot Catherine, Heran Emmanuelle, De Margerie Laure. France. In: Revue de l'Art, 1994, n°104. pp. 69-80
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
