1,720,959 research outputs found
Experimental validation of non-linear multi-body railroad vehicle system algorithms
The current trend in railroad industry is the development of reliable non-linear computational dynamic algorithms that can be used in the simulations of vehicle behaviour under different operating conditions. Of similar importance, is the development of experimental models that can be used in the validation of the proposed numerical algorithms. The objective of this investigation is to examine the accuracy of the results obtained using different multi-body contact formulations by comparing these results with experimental results. The numerical results are obtained using two different multibody contact formulations: the embedded constraint contact formulation and the quasi-elastic contact formulation; both are implemented in general purpose multi-body computer programs. The numerical results obtained using these two different methods are analysed and compared. These results are also compared with the test results of a bogie prototype that can be used with a roller rig built at Turin Polytechnic. The roller rig, which is designed to be used with full scale or reduced scale models, provides an efficient and economic way to validate the results of the computer algorithms. This roller rig, which can also be used to perform tests on bogies with different rail gauge and wheel base, has been designed using the Jaschinski’s scaling method. A bogie computer model based on the same dimensions and material properties of the Turin roller rig was developed using two different general purpose multibody computer programs that employ the two different nonlinear wheel/rail contact formulations and two different numerical algorithms for the automatic generation and solution of the system equations of motion. The results of the two different multibody formulations used in this study show a good agreement. Furthermore, the results show that the bogie critical speed predicted using the computer simulations is very close to the one obtained using the roller rig
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Evaluation of the response to chemotherapy in patients affected with small cell lung cancer using discriminant analysis: a preliminary report
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
