1,721,009 research outputs found

    Nation: its ontology and identity

    Get PDF
    This project investigates the ontology and identity of nations. Drawing from the thought experiment “The ship of Theseus” and some recent literatures on group metaphysics, I explore the domain of nations. There are two major enquiries: One, what is a nation? Second, how does a nation maintain its identity over time, despite all the changes it has undergone? I propose a perdurantist (worm theoretical) approach to understanding nations. I argue that a nation is a four-dimensional worm, which has stages as temporal parts. The stages have combinations of the people, the territory and the state as components. Social treatments (e.g. collective intentionality, joint commitment, mental file…etc) are required to bind these stages together

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used

    The semantics of nominal and clausal embedding: how (not) to embed a clause and why

    No full text
    There is a large class of verbs in English which can embed either a nominal or a clause. (1) a. Copernicus announced/believes/clarified/discovered/explained [CP that the earth revolves around the sun]. b. Copernicus announced/believes/clarified/discovered/explained [DP the theory]. These clause embedding verbs (CEVs) have been a focus for several strands of recent and not-so-recent work in both Linguistics and Philosophy. In Linguistics these verbs have been of interest to theories of argument selection (Grimshaw (1990), Pesetsky (1996)) and semantic composition (Kratzer (2006)), since CPs are non-prototypical arguments from either a semantic or syntactic perspective. These verbs have also long been important to Philosophers of Language interested in the role that ‘propositions’, which under the standard account are the denotation of these ‘that-clause’ (TC) CPs, play in the semantics of ‘propositional attitude reports’ and related modal and intensional constructions (Prior (1971), King (2002), Moltmann (2003)). This thesis argues for a novel account of the compositional semantics of CEVs which takes TCs to denote properties of contentful individuals that have two pathways to combine with a CEV, either through restriction or saturation of an internal argument. This account builds heavily on the Predicativist proposal of (Kratzer (2006), Moulton (2009, 2015)) which treats TCs as semantically predicates, in contrast to the standard view in which they denote propositions. Crucially for such an account TCs are not treated as thematic arguments of CEVs, but as modifiers of their objects. I argue that this theory is fundamentally correct, but that empirical observations about the behaviour of ‘presuppositional’ CEVs with respect to their available substitutions (Bach (1997)) and entailments (Uegaki (2015)) demonstrate the need to modify the theory further. The modification that I suggest exploits a recent, independent syntactic argument which demonstrates that some TC complements to CEVs are not bare CPs, but CPs headed by a covert determiner (Kastner 2015). I argue that augmenting the Predicativist semantic proposal with this syntactic claim, along with standard compositional tools allows us to explain a variety of data which was puzzling under pre-existing theories. The presuppositional DPs that result from combining a covert determiner with a predicative clause (denoting some definite individual with the proposition inside the embedded clause as its content) compose with the CEV by saturating its internal argument position, unlike the bare CPs which combine by restricting it. The new proposal has the advantage of capturing the classic puzzles for CEVs, including the entailment failures which were difficult for the unaugmented Predicativist account, whilst also being the result of a natural extension of standard compositional semantics for definite DPs with embedded nominas. This approach also provides novel insights into generalisations from the linguistic literature on argument selection and case, as it makes concrete predictions about how clausal ‘arguments’ interact with the case and theta systems. These predictions can be tested against a number of classically difficult phenomenon like experiencer predicates (Reinhart (2003)) and the verb ‘explain’ (Pietroski (2000)). I demonstrate how these predictions are borne out, supporting the proposal and advancing our understanding of these topics. The thesis is structured as follows: Chapter 1 presents a series of puzzles derived from TC and DP embedding under CEVs, namely, Quantificational inferences, Fine-grained semantic selectional restrictions, the variability of attitudinal objects, and content noun entailment patterns. I argue that no existing account is capable of explaining all of these puzzles, and that the dominant Propositionalist theory must be mistaken in several of its key assumptions. In Chapter 2 I introduce the alternative Predicativist account of the semantics of TCs (Kratzer (2006), Moulton (2009, 2015)), discuss the motivations for such an account, and I provide a novel argument for the position based on copula constructions with post-copula TCs. I then show how this theory accounts for most of the puzzles introduced in chapter 1, but cannot deal with the entailment failures of a certain subclass of CEVs. Chapter 3 then suggests that this class of entailment failing verbs is coextensive with the class of verbs identified in Kastner (2015) as selecting for TCs which are syntactically DPs and interpreted as presuppositional. I provide evidence for this analysis and discuss some cross-linguistic analogues with overt determiners with CP complements. I then propose a compositional semantics for these presuppositional TCs adapted from the Predicativist account argued for in chapter 2. I then show how the resultant account resolves all of the empirical puzzles set up in chapter 1, without introducing any new syntactic or semantic machinery that has not already been independently proposed. Chapter 4 explores the predictions and consequences of this theory for other domains of the selection literature, in particular relating to ECM, factivity, question-embedding, communicatives, and experiencer alternations. I argue that the proposal meshes well with existing proposals about how to understand case-assignment and argumenthood (Stowell (1982)). In the conclusion I discuss some consequences for the Philosophical literature on propositional attitudes, and present cross-linguistic and historical evidence for the plausibility of my account which invite future empirical work on the topi
    corecore