528 research outputs found
Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: A Balanced Retributive Account
The standard of proof in criminal trials in many liberal democracies is proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the BARD standard. It is customary to describe it, when putting a number on it, as requiring that the fact finder be at least 90% certain, after considering the evidence, that the defendant is guilty. Strikingly, no good reason has yet been offered in defense of using that standard. A number of non-consequentialist justifications that aim to support an even higher standard have been offered; all are morally unsound. Meanwhile, consequentialist arguments plausibly support a substantially lower standard — in some cases so low as to undermine the idea that punishment is what is at stake. In this paper, I offer a new retributive justification that supports excluding the instrumental benefits of punishment from the balance that sets the standard. The resulting balance supports a standard arguably in the ballpark of the customary understanding of BARD: a standard requiring that the fact finder have a high, though not maximally high, degree of confidence that the defendant is guilty
Fourth Amendment Rights for Nonresident Aliens
The U.S. National Security Agency has nearly unlimited authority to spy upon citizens of foreign countries while they are outside the United States. It goes almost without saying that such targeting of U.S. citizens, without any hint of individualized suspicion either of criminal wrongdoing or of being a threat to national security, would be constitutionally prohibited under the Fourth Amendment. However, the dominant view in the American legal community is that there is nothing constitutionally wrong, or even suspect, about such targeting of nonresident aliens.
This article argues that the dominant view of the law is wrong both descriptively and normatively. It is wrong with regard to the proper interpretation of the relevant constitutional case law, because that case law is more open ended and unclear than the dominant view represents it as being. And it is wrong with regard to the underlying legal and moral principles that should guide the interpretation and development of constitutional law. Those principles call for recognizing that nonresident aliens enjoy constitutional protection against unjust harms—a point argued for in a companion paper, “Constitutional Rights for Nonresident Aliens.” And those same principles imply that nonresident aliens enjoy the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures.Peer reviewe
The Use and Abuse of Definitions in Constitutional Law: A Critique of Justice Roberts's Dissent in Obergefell v. Hodges
Justice Roberts’s dissent in Obergefell v Hodges – the case in which the US Supreme Court found a constitutional right for same sex couples to marry – rested on the premise the Court cannot invoke the right to marry as a basis for changing the definition of marriage. But his argument works only if the Court has no obligation to find a constitutional meaning for the term. I argue here that it has such an obligation. I argue further that an analogy with the concept of ‘person’ throws light on how that obligation should work. And finally, I argue that the most plausible constitutional definition would include same sex couples.Peer reviewe
Constitutional Rights for Nonresident Aliens: A Doctrinal and Normative Argument
The decision in Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (2008), held that nonresident aliens (NRAs) detained for years in Guantanamo have a constitutional right to bring a habeas petition to challenge their detention. But the larger issue of constitutional rights for NRAs remains unresolved. Do NRAs outside of Guantanamo have constitutional rights? If so, do they enjoy substantial protections, such as those under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments? I argue here that the doctrine remains unclear, that the text is likewise unclear, that originalist arguments should carry little force, but that the normative argument is clear. As a condition of the legitimacy of U.S. law, NRAs must enjoy a range of constitutional rights that protect them from unjust harm at the hands of the United States
Recommended from our members
Alec Peters_Thesis_Presentation_Final.pdf
DNA segments in the fungus Fusarium graminearum were identified as possible genes encoding for chromodomain proteins (CDPs), and targeted for genetic manipulation. Targeted single-gene deletion strains, as wells as GFP-S tag fusion strains, were generated from wildtype F. graminearum protoplasts, and verified strains were screened for phenotypic differences, such as changes in growth, appearance, and levels of certain histone marks in the genome. It was found that the FgCdp6 gene is required for normal growth and appearance of F. graminearum, and its protein product localizes to nuclei of asexual spores. Further studies including western blots suggested that the CDP encoded by the FgCdp6 gene is a homolog of the yeast protein Eaf3, which is involved in both histone acetylation and deacetylation complexes.Keywords: histone, Fusarium graminearum, chromodomain proteins (CDPs), DN
Recommended from our members
Alec Peters_Thesis_BRR_Formatted.pdf
DNA segments in the fungus Fusarium graminearum were identified as possible genes encoding for chromodomain proteins (CDPs), and targeted for genetic manipulation. Targeted single-gene deletion strains, as wells as GFP-S tag fusion strains, were generated from wildtype F. graminearum protoplasts, and verified strains were screened for phenotypic differences, such as changes in growth, appearance, and levels of certain histone marks in the genome. It was found that the FgCdp6 gene is required for normal growth and appearance of F. graminearum, and its protein product localizes to nuclei of asexual spores. Further studies including western blots suggested that the CDP encoded by the FgCdp6 gene is a homolog of the yeast protein Eaf3, which is involved in both histone acetylation and deacetylation complexes.Keywords: chromodomain proteins (CDPs), histone, Fusarium graminearum, DN
Alec Grant: a living tribute
Purpose - This paper aims to provide a living tribute to the leading autoethnographer, Alec Grant. Design/methodology/approach - Alec provided Jerome with a list of names of people he might approach to write a tribute on his behalf. Findings - The accounts describe the influence that Alec has had both as an educator and as a trusted colleague for the people approached. Research limitations/implications - While this is a living tribute, it is about one man and could, therefore, be described as a case study. Some people wonder what can be learned from a single case study. Read on and find out. Practical implications - Alec has carved out a path for himself. In many senses, he chose ''The Road Less Travelled''. He has never shied away from challenging ''The System'' and defending the rights of the marginalized and socially excluded. It is not a road for the faint-hearted. Social implications - For systems to change, radical thinkers need to show the way. ''Change keeps us safe'' (Stuart Bell). Originality/value - Alec was a well-known and highly respected cognitive behavioural academic practitioner and the author of key textbooks in the field. He then decided to reinvent himself as an autoethnographer. This has brought him into contact with a much more diverse group of people. It has also brought him home to himself
Communication: Bubbles, crystals, and laser-induced nucleation
Short intense laser pulses of visible and infrared light can dramatically accelerate crystal nucleation from transparent solutions; previous studies invoke mechanisms that are only applicable for nucleation of ordered phases or high dielectric phases. However, we show that similar laser pulses induce CO2bubblenucleation in carbonated water. Additionally, in water that is cosupersaturated with argon and glycine, argon bubbles escaping from the water can induce crystal nucleation without a laser. Our findings suggest a possible link between laser-induced nucleation of bubbles and crystals
Senior Recital: Alec Jenkins, Clarinet; Momoko Gresham, Piano; Christian Rucinski, Clarinet; Erin Brown, Clarinet; Holly Peters, Clarinet; April 20, 2024
Kemp Recital HallApril 20, 2024SaturdayNoo
Library
Group exhibition of book works includes works by: Alison Calder/Jeanette Lyons/Onjana Yangwhe, Steven Leyden Cochrane, Roger Crait, Sigrid Dahle, William Eakin, Cliff Eyland, Ray Fenwick, Sarah Ferguson, Tim Froese, Ufuk Gueray, Lindsay Joy, Kevin Kelly, John Latour, Craig Love, Laura MacNutt, Kegan McFadden, Erica Mendritzki, Maggie Nelson, Pam Perkins, Corrie Peters, Willow Rector, Rodders, Gurpreet Sehra, Alec Shepley, Melissa Steele, Robert Taite, Vincent Tinguely, George Toles, Peter Trepanier, Meeka Walsh and Shannon Yashcheshen. This show's featured artist is Erica Mendritzki, who lives and works in Winnipeg. Library, 70 Arthur Street, Suite 540 (Silpit Building) Winnipeg, Canada. Library is an experimental, semi-public, non-profit irregular hours space. Receptions happen on the first Friday of every month from Noon-9 PM</p
- …
