1,720,999 research outputs found
A dedicated Earth-orbiting spacecraft for investigating fundamental physics and the space environment
No full textMETRIC: A dedicated earth-orbiting spacecraft for fundamental physics and geophysics
No full textA dedicated mission in low Earth orbit - called METRIC - is proposed to test selected predictions of gravitational theories and to measure directly the acceleration due to atmospheric drag in the altitude range considered, at the same time providing a metrological platform able to perform a tie between different space geodesy techniques. The core of the mission is a spacecraft of the micro class placed in an eccentric orbit between 450 and 1200 km of altitude. The satellite will be tracked from the ground with high precision and an on-board accelerometer package will measure the non-gravitational accelerations acting on it (e.g., atmospheric drag and solar radiation pressure). A precise orbit determination is expected to provide estimates of fundamental physics and geophysical parameters, while the accelerometer data are fundamental in constraining the atmospheric density variations. Along with the mission scientific objectives, a possible baseline for spacecraft configuration and a technique for the analysis of the non-gravitational perturbations is described in the paper
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Spectral phenotyping of physiological and anatomical leaf traits related with maize water status
Full text linkAdvancements in phenotyping techniques capable of rapidly and nondestructively detecting impacts of drought on crops are necessary to meet the 21st-century challenge of food security. Here, we describe the use of hyperspectral reflectance to predict variation in physiological and anatomical leaf traits related with water status under varying water availability in six maize (Zea mays) hybrids that differ in yield stability under drought. We also assessed relationships among traits and collections of traits with yield stability. Measurements were collected in both greenhouse and field environments, with plants exposed to different levels of water stress or to natural water availability, respectively. Leaf spectral measurements were paired with a number of physiological and anatomical reference measurements, and predictive spectral models were constructed using a partial leastsquares regression approach. All traits were relatively well predicted by spectroscopic models, with external validation (i.e. by applying partial least-squares regression coefficients on a dataset distinct from the one used for calibration) goodness-of-fit (R2) ranging from 0.37 to 0.89 and normalized error ranging from 12% to 21%. Correlations between reference and predicted data were statistically similar for both greenhouse and field data. Our findings highlight the capability of vegetation spectroscopy to rapidly and nondestructively identify a number of foliar functional traits affected by drought that can be used as indicators of plant water status. Although we did not detect trait coordination with yield stability in the hybrids used in this study, expanding the range of functional traits estimated by hyperspectral data can help improve trait-based breeding approaches
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
