1,721,030 research outputs found

    Adherence to antihyperglycemic medications and glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes: Clinical consequences and strategies for improvement

    Full text link
    Adherence to antihyperglycemic medications is often suboptimal in patients with type 2 diabetes, and this can contribute to poor glycemic control, increased hospitalization, and the development of diabetic complications. Reported adherence rates to antihyperglycemics vary widely among studies, and this may be related to differences in methodology for measuring adherence, patient populations, and other factors. Poor adherence may occur regardless of the specific regimen used and whether therapy is oral or injectable, and can be especially common in chronic, asymptomatic conditions, such as type 2 diabetes. More convenient drug-administration regimens and advances in formulations and delivery devices are among strategies shown to improve adherence to antihyperglycemic therapy, especially for injectable therapy. This is exemplified by technological developments made in the drug class of glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonists, which are a focus of this narrative review. Dulaglutide, albiglutide, and prolonged-release exenatide have an extended duration of action and can be administered once weekly, whereas such agents as liraglutide require once-daily administration. The convenience of once-weekly versus once-daily administration is associated with better adherence in real-world studies involving this class of agent. Moreover, provision of a user-friendly delivery device has been shown to overcome initial resistance to injectable therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes. This suggests that recent innovations in drug formulation (eg, ready-to-use formula-tions) and delivery systems (eg, single-dose prefilled pens and hidden, ready-attached needles) may be instrumental in encouraging patient acceptance. For physicians who aim to improve their patients’ adherence to antihyperglycemic medications, it is thus important to consider the patient’s therapeutic experience (treatment frequency, drug formulation, delivery device). Better adherence, powered by recent technological advances in the delivery of glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonists, may thus lead to improved clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes

    Monitoring of Langerhans islet transplantation : MRI imaging and cellular immune monitoring efficiency

    No full text
    La greffe d'îlots de Langerhans permet de traiter le diabète de type 1 en restituant une insuline-sécrétion. La moitié des patients reprend l'insuline dans les 5 ans. Cette perte de fonction s'explique par l'absence d'outils de monitoring. Le but de notre travail était de déterminer l'efficacité de l'IRM à diagnostiquer un rejet de greffe, et d'évaluer l'intérêt du monitoring cellulaire chez les patients.Imagerie IRM chez le ratMéthodes : Des îlots syngéniques, allogéniques ou xénogéniques ont été greffés par voie intra-portale à des rats diabétiques après marquage avec une nanoparticule de fer (ferucarbotran). Les IRM étaient réalisées dans une IRM clinique 3T.Résultats : La décroissance du signal était différente suivant les 3 types de greffes. Le signal IRM des greffes allogéniques était significativement plus bas à J4 alors que la glycémie était normale. En prenant un seuil de 84% à J4, l'IRM permet d'obtenir une sensibilité de 91% et une spécificité de 70% Innnuno-monitoring cellulaireMéthodes : Des réactions lymphocytaires mixtes étaient réalisées entre les PBMC des patients greffés, et les splénocytes des donneurs. La réaction immunitaire était évaluée par la sécrétion d'IFNy (ELISpot), par la prolifération cellulaire (cytométrie du flux du Ki67), et par le dosage des cytokines (Bioplex). Le résultat était corrélé à la fonction du greffon évaluée par le (3-score).Résultats : Les patients avec une mauvaise fonction montraient une plus grande réactivité anti-donneur avec l'ELISpot IFNy (p=0,007, r=-0,50) et l'index de prolifération (p=0,006, r=-0,51). Les patients avec une mauvaise fonction avaient des taux d'IFNy, IL-5 et IL-17 plus élevés.Langerhans islet transplantation allows curingtype 1 diabetes by restoring an endogenous insulin secretion. Halfof patients will resume insulin withinyears. This loss of function may be explained by the lack of monitoring tools able to diagnose an ongoing graft failure. The aims of our work were toevaluate the efficiency of MRI to diagnose islet graft rejection, and to assess the feasibility of immune cellular monitoring in transplanted patients.MRI in the rat mortelMethods: Syngeneic, allogeneic and xenogeneic islets were transplanted intra-portally to diabetic rats after labeling with superparamagnetic ironoxide nanoparticles (ferucarbotran). Images were acquired on a clinical 3T MRI scanner.Results: The signal decreasing was different between the 3 types of transplantations. At day 4, the MRI signal in allogeneic group was significantlylower while glycaemia remained normal. With a cut-off value of 84% at day 4, sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 70% were obtained.Cellular immune monitoringMethods: Mixed lymphocyte cultures were performed with peripheral blood mononuclear cells from recipients and splenocytes from donors. Immunereactivity was assessed by the release of IFNy (ELISpot), cell prolifération (flow cytometry of Ki67), and cytokine quantification (Bioplex). Theresults were correlated to the islet graft function assessed by (5-score.Results: Patients with low islet function showed higher cellular reactivity against donor cells assessed by ELISpot IFNy ((p=0,007, r=-0,50) andproliferation index (p=0,006, r=-0,51). Patients with low graft function had higher levels of IFNy, IL-5 and 1L-17

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore