177,527 research outputs found

    An American Anomaly? On the ICJ's Selective Reading of United States Practice in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State

    No full text
    The ICJ's treatment of US practice translates into one of the most controversial aspects of the Jurisdictional Immunities judgment. The Court's approach was elusive and patchy. Certain key decisions by US courts in the field of sovereign immunity were patently neglected, while others were addressed in a misleading manner. This article examines the Court's citations and omissions relating to US practice, with respect to both the jus cogens and tort exception arguments advanced by Italy in defense of its Ferrini jurisprudence denying immunity when the defendant State is accused of egregious breaches of human rights. The article also enquires into the possible reasons at the root of the Court's inadequate assessment of US practice. It takes the view that the Court's dismissive attitude vis-à-vis the anomalous American experience casts doubt over the judgment's reliability and persuasiveness as an accurate reflection of the contemporary law of State immunity. © 2012 Brill. All rights reserved

    The Preventive Pedagogy of Saint Ludovico Pavoni

    No full text
    Saint Ludovico Pavoni was born in Brescia (Italy) in 1784 and died in Saiano (Brescia) in 1849. He dedicated his life to the training of young people and children through the workshops and a characteristic educational method. Priest, man of God, apostle of the world of work, pioneer of vocational training even before John Bosco, father of orphans and deaf mutes, and forerunner of the Catholic publishing house. In 1847, he founded the Congregation of the Sons of Mary Immaculate (Pavonians). In 1821, he gave rise to the Institute of San Bernabé, a ‘School of Crafts’, so that “the homeless and the most neglected by the parents themselves, find a free shelter and they will surely grow up educated in the honorable arts”. For 30 years, Pavoni would direct this Institute by directing the educational method and the workshops (typography, forge, binding...), for the results obtained, and for prevention and treatment of situations that were, in the 19th century, true social scourges. Here, Pavoni developed his own method, being at the forefront of pedagogues of the 19th century, a method based on the love for kids, rationality, the importance of work, emulation and honour, prevention and the gospel. Even now, the Pavonian family continues to work on Pavoni’s tracks.Pedagogia prewencyjna świętego Ludwika PavoniŚw. Ludwik Pavoni urodził się w Brescii (Włochy) w 1784 roku i zmarł w Saiano (Brescia) w 1849 roku. Swoje życie poświęcił wychowaniu młodzieży i dzieci poprzez warsztaty i specyficzną metodę edukacyjną. Kapłan, człowiek Boży, apostoł świata pracy, pionier nauczania zawodowego wyprzedzający w tym obszarze Jana Bosco, ojciec sierot i głuchoniemych, założyciel katolickiego wydawnictwa. W 1847 r. założył Zgromadzenie Synów Maryi Niepokalanej (pawonianie). W 1821 r. dał początek Instytutowi Świętego Barnaby, „Szkole Rzemiosła”, tak aby „bezdomni i najbardziej zaniedbywani przez samych rodziców znaleźli schronienie i dorastali kształceni w szlachetnych sztukach”. Przez 30 lat Pavoni będzie kierować tym instytutem, wskazując metody edukacyjne oraz warsztaty (typografia, kuźnia, wiązanie...), dla uzyskania pożądanych wyników oraz zapobiegania i leczenia sytuacji, które w XIX wieku stanowiły prawdziwe plagi społeczne. Tutaj Pavoni opracował własną metodę, stając na czele pedagogów w XIX wieku, metodę opartą na miłości do dzieci, racjonalności, znaczeniu pracy, naśladowaniu i honorze, zapobieganiu i Ewangelii. Również współcześnie pawonianie wykorzystują ścieżki wyznaczone przez św. Ludwika Pavoni

    Stergiopoulos v. Iran: Italian Supreme Court of Cassation Decision on Human Rights Limitations on Sovereign Immunity in International Law and Italian Constitutional Law

    No full text
    In Angela Stergiopoulos v. Iran, the Italian Supreme Court of Cassation held that state immunity does not bar exequatur proceedings against a foreign state when those proceedings seek the recognition and enforcement of a foreign judicial decision finding the state responsible for serious breaches of human rights. Stergiopoulos confirms the Italian courts’ persisting inclination to champion a human rights limitation to state immunity in contrast to mainstream transnational case law. It also reveals several legal and policy risks arising out of that position. Yet the decision should be seen in the context of a new constellation of states prioritizing human rights enforcement over state immunity, including Brazil and, at least in the Court’s view, the United States, especially given the availability under U.S. law of proceedings against states sponsors of terrorism accused of certain egregious violations of human rights
    corecore