119,547 research outputs found
Patten, K L, 440006
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/409794Surname: PATTEN. Given Name(s) or Initials: K L. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 440006. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 57990.225431
Item: [2016.0049.42065] "Patten, K L, 440006
The marriage record of Patten, Edward B. and Canning, Emma L
No full textMarriage license for Edward B. Patten and Emma L. Canning. William J. Tyrell was the officiant
Bradley M. Patten. Embriologia Humana.
No full textBradley M. Patten. Embriologia Humana. Ed. El Ateneo. Buenos Aires, 1956
Three Bangor Novels
No full textThree short novels with Bangor as the setting by Burt L. Standish from Top Notch Magazine from 1912. Burt L. Standish was the pen name of Corinna, Maine, native Gilbert Patten. The novels are: Bainbridge of Bangor, The Portals of Chance, and Crucial Fire.https://digicom.bpl.lib.me.us/books_pubs/1266/thumbnail.jp
The tribute of praise : a collection of hymns and tunes for public and social worship, and for use in the family circle and Sabbath school /
No full text"Compiled ... by Rev. W. M'Donald and L. F. Snow ... with the valued assistance and advice of Rev. David Patten." - Publisher's notice.Mode of access: Internet
The historical development of the it-cleft: A comparison of two different approaches
No full textThis chapter compares two approaches to a particular grammatical change. While Ball (1991, 1994) investigates the development of the it-cleft configuration from within the generative tradition of the 1990s, I have recently re-examined the historical it-cleft data from a constructional perspective (see Patten 2010, 2012). In this chapter, I show how our different theoretical assumptions lead us to categorize and analyse the data differently. I conclude that a constructional approach is better at interpreting the diachronic facts
Feature difference task
No full textIn the feature difference task, all dots in the random-dot stereogram were correlated and given a disparity. The surrounding disparity was presented at a crossed (near) disparity of 12 arcmin and was fixed for all trials. The central target plane varied relative to this plane, and appeared either 6, 18, 30, 60, 240 arcsec in front or behind this plane. We asked participants to judge the depth of the central plane relative to its surround while undergoing functional imaging of the visual cortex
Feature difference task
No full textIn the feature difference task, all dots in the random-dot stereogram were correlated and given a disparity. The surrounding disparity was presented at a crossed (near) disparity of 12 arcmin and was fixed for all trials. The central target plane varied relative to this plane, and appeared either 6, 18, 30, 60, 240 arcsec in front or behind this plane. We asked participants to judge the depth of the central plane relative to its surround while undergoing functional imaging of the visual cortex
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
