1,721,024 research outputs found

    Reproducibility and reliability of repeated semen analyses in male partners of subfertile couples

    No full text
    Presented in part at the 65th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, October 17–21, 2009.Abstract not availableEsther Leushuis, Jan Willem van der Steeg, Pieternel Steures, Sjoerd Repping, Patrick M.M. Bossuyt, Marinus A. Blankenstein, Ben Willem J. Mol, Fulco van der Veen, and Peter G.A. Hompe

    Laparoscopy to predict the result of primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized controlled trial

    No full text
    Abstract not availableMarianne J. Rutten, Hannah S. van Meurs, Roelien van de Vrie, Katja N. Gaarenstroom, Christiana A. Naaktgeboren, Toon van Gorp, Henk G. Ter Brugge, Ward Hofhuis, Henk W.R. Schreuder, Henriette J.G. Arts, Petra L.M. Zusterzeel, Johanna M.A. Pijnenborg, Maarten van Haaften, Guus Fons, Mirjam J.A. Engelen, Erik A. Boss, M. Caroline Vos, Kees G. Gerestein, Eltjo M.J. Schutter, Brent C. Opmeer, Anje M. Spijkerboer, Patrick M.M. Bossuyt, Ben Willem Mol, Gemma G. Kenter, and Marrije R. Buis

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Study Designs and Statistics for Precision Medicine

    No full text

    Spin and Overinterpretation in Test Evaluation

    No full text
    corecore