126,160 research outputs found
Pascoe, M B, 1555980
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/409666Surname: PASCOE. Given Name(s) or Initials: M B. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 1555980. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 47846.225301
Item: [2016.0049.41937] "Pascoe, M B, 1555980
Dipsaconia Pascoe 1862
No full textDipsaconia Pascoe, 1862: 123 Type species: Dipsaconia pyritosa Pascoe, 1860: 124, by present designation. Distribution: Australia. Note: Two species were included in the genus by Pascoe (1860), here we designate Dipsaconia pyritosa Pascoe as the type species. Included species (2): D. australis (Hope, 1843: 359 [Endophlaeus Hope 1843: 359], combination by Champion 1894: 377, = Dipsaconia bakewelli Pascoe, 1860: 124, synonymy by Champion 1894: 377), D. pyritosa Pascoe, 1860: 124.Published as part of Leschen, Richard A. B., Escalona, Hermes E. & Elgueta, Mario, 2016, Phylogeny of the Gondwanan beetle family Ulodidae (Tenebrionoidea), pp. 441-473 in Zootaxa 4138 (3) on page 468, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4138.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/25846
Commemoration of the boon of the separation of the Province of Victoria from the colony of New South Wales : Melbourne, the fifteenth November, 1850.
No full textCaption title.; Ferguson, J.A. Australia, 5333 and the (b) variant; Australian Book Auctions. The Davidson Collection ... second sale, lot 399.; Also available in an electronic version via the Internet at: http://nla.gov.au/nla.aus-f5333; Library's copy is printed in black on white paper.; Purchased at the Davidson Collection sale 2 auction, 27 February 2006. Printed on the back of a lorry and scattered through the crowd by the printer-publishers of Melbourne in the line of procession during the celebrations to mark the separation of the new Province of Victoria from New South Wales in 1850. The broadside details the history of the press in Port Phillip and its crucial role in the cause of separation, was written by John Pascoe Fawkner, designed and set up by William Clarke, overseer of the Herald and printed on a hand-press. Clarke, Fawkner, Samuel Goode and Benjamin Lucas scattered the printed sheets among the crowd as they left the press
Ganyme Pascoe 1869
No full textGanyme Pascoe, 1869: 32 Type species: Ganyme howitti Pascoe, 1869: 33, by monotypy. Distribution: Australia. Included species (3): G. demarzi (Kulzer, 1964: 268 [Ulodes], combination by Lawrence 1994: 346), G. sapphira (Newman, 1842: 404 [Bolitophagus], combination by Champion 1894: 377; = Ganyme howitti Pascoe, 1869: 33, synonymy by Champion 1894: 378), G. tuberculatus (Carter, 1926b: 510 [Ulodes], combination by Lawrence 1994: 346).Published as part of Leschen, Richard A. B., Escalona, Hermes E. & Elgueta, Mario, 2016, Phylogeny of the Gondwanan beetle family Ulodidae (Tenebrionoidea), pp. 441-473 in Zootaxa 4138 (3) on page 468, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4138.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/25846
Mispila venosa Pascoe 1864
No full text<i>Mispila</i> (<i>s. str.</i>) <i>venosa venosa</i> Pascoe, 1864 <p>(Figures 1, 2)</p> <p> <i>Mispila venosa</i> Pascoe, 1864: 90; Gemminger & Harold, 1873: 3092.</p> <p> <i>Mispila</i> (<i>Mispila</i>) <i>venosa</i>: Aurivillius, 1922: 275; Breuning, 1961a: 281; Breuning, 1963b: 485; Makihara <i>et al.</i>, 2002: 195; Yan <i>et al</i>., 2023: 3.</p> <p> <b>Type material examined. Malaysia. Lectotype,</b> male (Figure 1a–d): ‘Type [p, label circular, redframed]; Sarawak [h, label oval, dark green]; Pascoe / Coll. / 93–60 [p]; Mispila / venosa [h]; Mispila / venosa / Type / Pasc. [h]; NHMUK 014596489 [p]’; <b>Paralectotype</b>, 1 female (Figure 1e–h): ‘ Sarawak [h, label oval, dark green]; Pascoe / Coll. / 93–60 [p]; NHMUK 013387730 [p]’; <b>Paralectotype</b>, 1 female: ‘Sar k [h][Sarawak]; Pascoe / Coll. / 93–60 [p]; Mispila / venosa [h]; NHMUK 013387732 [p]’; <b>Paralectotype</b>, 1 male: ‘ TYPE [p]; Borneo [h]; Fry Coll. / 1905. 100. [p]; 34095 [h]; Mispila / venosa / N. B. [North Borneo] Pasc [h]; NHMUK 014596467 [p]’.</p> <p> <b>Non-type material examined. Malaysia:</b> 1 male: ‘Malay Penin. / Ex Coll. Perak / Museum [h]; Ex F. M S. / Museum. / B. M. 1955–354. [p]; 113 [h]; Niphoninae / Mispila / venosa / Pascoe / Pl V. fig 2 Pasc. [h]; Mispila / venosa Pasc. [h] / det. K. G. Blair. [p]; NHMUK 013387721 [p]’; <b>Indonesia:</b> 3 males and 1 female: ‘ Java. [p] / Bowring. 63·47* [p]’; 1 male: ‘Banda [h]; Pascoe / Coll. / 93–60 [p]’; 1 male: ‘ Java. [p]; Bowring. 63·47* [p]; 36 [h, blue-grey paper]’; 1 female: ‘ Celebes / Latimodjong Geb. / Oeroe 800 m / Heinrich 8. 1930 [p, yellow paper]; Celebes. / G. Heinrich. / B. M. 1933–117. [p, orange line]; Mispila / venosa / Pasc. [h] / det. Breuning [p]; NHMUK 013387726’; 1 female: ‘ Java. [p] / Bowring. 63·47* [p]; Mispila / venosa, Pasc.; from fig. & descriptn [h]’.</p> <p> <b>Comments.</b> A total of 13 specimens of this species were examined. Pascoe (1864) provided two type localities: Sarawak and Batchian (now Bacan). Four specimens from the Pascoe collection (with registration number 93–60) were found, three of which are from Sarawak (1 male and 2 females, Figure 1a–h and Figure 2a, b) and were confirmed to be syntypes without doubt, but the remaining one (Figure 2g, h) is uncertain as it is labelled (in Pascoe’s handwriting) as ‘Banda’ rather than ‘Batchian’.</p> <p> It is here not treated as a type specimen, but in the absence of any ‘Batchian’ material it is possible that Pascoe made an error while writing the description. Yan <i>et al</i>. (2023) designated the lectotype (Figure 1a–d) based on photographs of a male from Sarawak which was illustrated in Pascoe’s original work. Another male specimen (Figure 2i, j) from North Borneo from the Fry collection has been labelled by Fry with a type label, and bears the number 34095, which in the Fry Register states that it was received as a type from Pascoe.</p> <p>Based on this information, and because Sarawak is in North Borneo, it is treated as a paralectotype.</p> <p>The dark spots on the pronotum and elytra are varied: the pronotal dark spots range from slightly darker on the margins on both sides (Figure 1a, Figure 2g) to occupying almost the entire pronotal disc (Figure 1e, Figure 2i), and the middle part of the elytron ranges from a small dark spot (Figure 1c, g) to a conspicuous big lateral dark brown spot (Figure 2e). However, the white linear bands on the elytra are very stable: the transverse line at the basal 1/3 of each elytron always extends to the suture, where a short longitudinal line is inserted at its middle and connected to the inner end of the short oblique line behind it.</p>Published as part of <i>Xie, Guanglin, Barclay, Maxwell V. L. & Wang, Wenkai, 2023, The collection of the genus Mispila Pascoe, 1864 housed in the Natural History Museum, London (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), pp. 245-265 in Zootaxa 5352 (2)</i> on pages 246-248, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5352.2.6, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8407247">http://zenodo.org/record/8407247</a>
Dark Emu Black Seeds : Agriculture Or Accident?
No full textDark Emu argues for a reconsideration of the 'hunter-gatherer' tag for pre-colonial Aboriginal Australians and attempts to rebut the colonial myths that have worked to justify dispossession. Accomplished author Bruce Pascoe provides compelling evidence from the diaries of early explorers that suggests that systems of food production and land management have been blatantly understated in modern retellings of early Aboriginal history, and that a new look at Australia’s past is require
Intybia Pascoe
No full text<i>Intybia</i> Pascoe <p> <i>Intybia</i> Pascoe, 1866: 448. Type species, by monotypy: <i>Intybia guttata</i> Pascoe, 1866.</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> In addition to the species included below, some species currently classified in <i>Dicranolaius</i> will certainly be transferred to <i>Intybia</i> after detailed examinations of the type specimens and additional material. <i>Laius filamentarius</i> Lea was thought to be a true <i>Laius</i> by Wittmer (1952) however, according to the current generic concepts (Evers 1994) this species should be classified in <i>Intybia</i> based on the modified basal antennomeres in male, but with fore femur, tibia and tarsi simple without secondary sexual characters.</p>Published as part of <i>Liu, Zhenhua, Ślipiński, Adam & Pang, Hong, 2015, Notes on Australian Laius Guérin-Méneville, Dicranolaius Champion and Intybia Pascoe with description of new species related to Dicranolaius c-purpureus (Lea) (Coleoptera: Melyridae: Malachiinae), pp. 272-280 in Zootaxa 3936 (2)</i> on page 273, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3936.2.7, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/243084">http://zenodo.org/record/243084</a>
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Aconodes montanus Pascoe 1857
No full text3. Aconodes montanus Pascoe, 1857 Aconodes montanus Pascoe, 1857b: 107, pl. XXIII, figs 7, 7a–b; Holzschuh, 1984a: 154, fig. 15 (♂); Weigel, 2006: 502 (Distr.). Type Locality: Induia: Hymalaya Mts. (HT); BMNH. Aconodes montana Breuning, 1961c: 310 (Cat.). Distribution: India (Himalaya Mts.; Sikkim) & Nepal.Published as part of Gupta, Rajeev & Vitali, Francesco, 2017, The checklist of longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) from India, pp. 1-317 in Zootaxa 4345 (1) on page 184, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4345.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/104413
Golsinda Pascoe 1857
No full textGenus <i>Golsinda</i> Pascoe, 1857 <p> <i>Golsinda</i> Pascoe, 1857: 49; Thomson, 1861: 343; 1864: 369; Pascoe, 1864 /65: 96, 133; Lacordaire, 1869: 368, 370; Aurivillius, 1922: 135; Breuning, 1938: 388; 1959: 49; Rondon & Breuning, 1970: 318, 319.</p> <p> Type species: <i>Golsinda corallina</i> Pascoe, 1857.</p> <p> <b>Nomenclatural notes.</b> The authorship of the genus <i>Golsinda</i> and <i>G. corallina</i> has been credited to Thomson (1860) by succeeding researchers (<i>e.g.</i> Pascoe 1862, Breuning 1939, 1959, Rondon & Breuning 1970). However, this genus was first established by Pascoe (1857) with the descriptions of <i>G. tessellata</i>, <i>G. reticulata</i> and <i>G. c o r a l - lina</i> prior to Thomson (1860, 1861), though <i>G. reticulata</i> and <i>G. corallina</i> were put in the note with a short and austere description referred to White’s unpublished manuscript. These descriptions can be regarded as fulfilling the provision of article 12 of ICZN (1999). Therefore, <i>G. reticulata</i> and <i>G. corallina</i> should be available species names under the authorship of Pascoe (1857). The authorship of the genus also should be attributed to Pascoe (1857) (ICZN 1999, Art. 11.5 and 12.2.5).</p> <p> Thomson (1861) redescribed “ <i>Golsinda</i> White?” and “ <i>Golsinda corallina</i> White?” and listed “ <i>G</i>. <i>tessellata</i>, Pascoe ” in his note. Later, Pascoe (1862) established the genus <i>Palimna</i> for <i>G. tessellata</i> and <i>G. reticulata</i>, and remarked that Thomson (1861) designated the type species of <i>Golsinda</i> as <i>G. corallina</i>. However, the type species of the genus was fixed neither by Pascoe (1857) nor by Thomson (1861). It should be noted that Pascoe (1862) subsequently designated the type species of <i>Golsinda</i> as <i>G. corallina</i>, even if it was unintentional (ICZN 1999, Art. 69.1.1). As a result, the authorship of the genus <i>Golsinda</i> should be attributed to Pascoe (1857), and the type species of this genus is <i>G. corallina</i> Pascoe, 1857, subsequently designated by Pascoe (1862).</p>Published as part of <i>Yamasako, Junsuke & Makihara, Hiroshi, 2011, A new species of the genus Golsinda Pascoe, 1857 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Mesosini) from the Malay Peninsula, with a nomenclatural note of the genus, pp. 63-68 in Zootaxa 3047</i> on pages 63-64, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/201612">10.5281/zenodo.201612</a>
- …
