1,720,959 research outputs found
A comparison between microCT and histology for the evaluation of cortical porosity: A preliminary study
No full textBone mineral density measurements on cortical and trabecular specimens: Validation of a densitometric calibration protocol for in-vitro micro-CT
No full text
A comparison between micro-CT and histology for the evaluation of cortical bone: effect of polymethylmethacrylate embedding on structural parameters
No full textCortical bone microstructure is an important parameter in the evaluation of bone strength. The aim of this study was to validate the characterization of human cortical bone microarchitecture using microcomputed tomography. In order to do this, microcomputed tomography structural measurements were compared with those obtained through histological examination (the gold standard). Moreover, to calculate structural parameters, microcomputed tomography images have to be binarized with the separation between bone and nonbone structures throughout a global thresholding. As the effect of the surrounding medium on the threshold value is not clear, an easy procedure to find the global uniform threshold for a given acquisition condition is applied. This work also compared the structural parameters of microcomputed tomography cortical sample scan in air or embedded in polymethylmethacrylate; histology was used as a reference. For each acquisition condition, a fixed threshold value was found and was applied on the corresponding microcomputed tomography image for the parameters assessment. Twenty cortical bone samples were collected from human femur and tibia diaphyses. All samples were microcomputed tomography scanned in air, embedded in polymethylmethacrylate, rescanned by microcomputed tomography, examined by histology and finally compared. A good correspondence between the microcomputed tomography images and the histological sections was found. Paired comparisons in cortical porosity, Haversian canal diameterandHaversian canal separation between histological sections and microcomputed tomography cross sections, first in air and then embedded in PolyMethylMethAcrylate, were made: no significant differences were found. None of the comparisons showed significant differences for cortical porosity, Haversian canal diameter and Haversian separation over a three- dimensional volume of interest, between microcomputed tomography scans in air and with samples embedded in PolyMethylMethAcrylate. The very good correlation between bone structural measures obtained from microcomputed tomographydatasets and from two- dimensional histological sections confirms that microcomputed tomography may be an efficient tool for the characterization of cortical bone microstructure. Moreover, when the corresponding threshold value for each condition is used, structural parameters determined by microcomputed tomography are not affected by the surrounding medium (PolyMethylMethAcrylate)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
